loofah | Ruby library for HTML/XML transformation and sanitization
kandi X-RAY | loofah Summary
kandi X-RAY | loofah Summary
Loofah is a general library for manipulating and transforming HTML/XML documents and fragments, built on top of Nokogiri. Loofah excels at HTML sanitization (XSS prevention). It includes some nice HTML sanitizers, which are based on HTML5lib's safelist, so it most likely won't make your codes less secure. (These statements have not been evaluated by Netexperts.). ActiveRecord extensions for sanitization are available in the loofah-activerecord gem.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Returns the text of the document .
- Sanitize node elements .
- tries to traverse each node in the root node .
- Safely traverse each node in the tree .
- Append the attribute value to the given attribute .
- Checks the node .
- Searches the given node .
loofah Key Features
loofah Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on loofah
QUESTION
What I already tried:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-18 at 16:51I'm afraid it doesn't work because the url filter is hardcoded.
QUESTION
I am learning Hotwire-rails, following both the gorails.com and the Hotwire.dev examples. I am running Ruby 3.0.2 and Rails 6.1.4.1. The symptom is at the very start. After rails new xxx, I edit Gemfile to add gem 'hotwire-rails', then bundle install. At this point my app/javascript/packs/application.js is now:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-11 at 12:27This seems like everything is working correctly rails just likes to output what its doing to the console but it should have added those to your file.
QUESTION
If one uses Rails::Html::PermitScrubber and doesn't specify a value for tags or attributes it defaults to using reasonable defaults from Loofah::HTML5::Scrub. However, as soon as you set tags or attributes it chooses a completely different code path that ignores those defaults.
I want to start with the default functionality provided by Rails::Html::PermitScrubber (i.e. when tags/attributes aren't specified) and just make a few small changes but looking at the class implementation it seems like I would need to basically copy and reimplement half the PermitScrubber methods just to access that default functionality. And the defaults provided by Loofah::HTML5::Scrub don't seem to be part of any existing Loofah::Scrubber class.
So how do I make minor changes to the default operation of Rails::Html::PermitScrubber without reimplementing half the class? Surely this is a very common use case!
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-08 at 11:24I guess you can just subclass Rails::Html::PermitScrubber
and override keep_node?
to get needed behavior (not changing code path if tags are present).
The code of original keep_node?
is
QUESTION
I'm seeing the following error it only is appearing in cron jobs using the whenever gem. The application is working correctly otherwise. The scheduled job doesn't run. But I can run it manually and it does work.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-23 at 15:08The issue was related to environment variables and not being able to find the correct path for the gems. I found a solution and updated the schedule.rb file.
QUESTION
I'm trying to scrub out mailto links while allowing others using Rails::HTML Scrubbers.
See: https://github.com/rails/rails-html-sanitizer
I have a Loofah fragment like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-18 at 04:00Ok, I worked it out. To call those methods, you need to set the tags and attributes arrays:
QUESTION
So after executing the following commands:
rails new sample_app
cd sample_app
rails db:create
rails generate scaffold User name:string email:string
rails db:migrate
and finaly when i run rails server
i get:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-02 at 08:30I think you need a webpacker.yml
file in your apps config
file. I also suggest running bundle install
and bundle update
commands before launching the rails server after you installed a gem. Here's a closed issue similar to your problem; https://github.com/rails/webpacker/issues/940
QUESTION
Looked through past posts on SO but couldn't find the solution.
Environment:
- Mac OS Big Sur
- Rails 6.1.3.2
- ruby 3.0.1p64
Github repo https://github.com/tenzan/ruby-bootcamp
Added Bootsrtap 5 according to https://blog.corsego.com/rails-6-install-bootstrap-with-webpacker-tldr
To push to heroku I ran git push heroku main
Output:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 00:32ModuleNotFoundError: Module not found: Error: Can't resolve '@popperjs/core'
suggests that you need to install @popperjs/core
.
QUESTION
Im running ruby version 2.6.1 with docker. Rake gem is version 13.0.1.
Whenever I tried docker-compose up, it always fails and throws this error everytime:
This error did not exist before.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-23 at 12:27I'm not really sure what happened and why but I tried doing this on my rails container and I was no longer receiving the said error.
docker-compose run --rm bash
cd to project directory
bundle install
QUESTION
I'm trying to build a Rails application on Mac OS Big Sur with the following versions ...
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-13 at 18:30From your ruby -v
, I see that you are in an Intel x86 Mac, but the gem that your trying to build (nokogiri-1.11.3-arm64-darwin
) is for new Mac ARM M1 chips. If this is the cause, it means your are using precompiled gems.
Try uninstalling the gem, specify that you don't want to use precompiled gems, and reinstall.
QUESTION
I'm helping a friend with a project, but after helping him with the logic instead of merging my branch, for some reason he copied the code and added it himself. So my branch remained "behind". He kept working and now he asked me to help him with something else, but I had a bunch of conflicts to resolve before working on the new logic, I tried to resolve the conflicts manually but something must have slipped my check, because now I have a bunch of conflicts in the Gemfile.lock that I don't know how to fix. Can you guys give it a check? Thank you so much!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-04 at 16:57Gemfile.lock is a file generated from Gemfile. As such, instead of trying to merge the two branches, it's simpler and more accurate to generate a new one from its canonical source. This might result in slightly different versions, but these should cause no trouble; any version restrictions should be defined in your Gemfile.
Normally one does not commit generated files, they can change in trivial ways, but Gemfile.lock is a special case where you do want this to be the same for all builds.
Resolve any conflicts in the Gemfile. Regenerate Gemfile.lock. Add it.
for some reason he copied the code and added it himself
This is a good opportunity to explain to them why this is a bad practice when working with a team. It might be easy for them, but it's causing trouble for you. They might need instructing in how to update their work in progress. Or you might need to extract some changes into their own branch and get that merged.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install loofah
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page