paloma | page-specific javascript for Rails done right | Internationalization library

I have a html form for selecting a data source to feed my wordcloud in d3.js, but i'm having a hard time making it work. here is the code I have so far.

I'm using the solution for the cloudword from https://github.com/wvengen and hosted the .js scripts in the web of my project

EDITION:

I can load the selected data, but it load down the old data, I need to delete the event svg an add the new one instead.

I am migrating an application from Rails 4 to Rails 5 but am struggling to get a complete bundle due to dependency conflicts. I am a bit confused as to why this is a problem as I don't completely understand why the bundler cannot resolve the dependencies.

In this case, I am on Windows. I have installed Ruby 2.5.5 using BitNami Ruby and installed Rails 5.2.3. I deleted Gemfile.lock and ran bundle install. The Gemfile specifies Ruby 2.5.5 and Rails 5.2.3. No other gems have version requirements specified. Bundle is at 1.17.3.

My interest on this issue, other converting this particular application, is to better understand how bundle resolves dependencies. Looking at the bundler documentation, I haven't discovered the reason for some conflicts. As an example, why would the bundler not accept actionpack 5.2.3 in this case:

I need a little help

I feel stupid not knowing why this isn't working, seems simple enough. I have a form and trying to validate it using onSubmit="return validateForm()" however if you submit it with none of the fields that are required filled in which would result in a "false" it is submitting to itself.

Javascript:

I have a ruby on Rails 4.2 app and am facing a "hair-tearing" issue for long 2 days about my asset pipeline. My prod is hosted on Heroku and I directly mention this here as I think it might be relevant I have them gem 'rails_12factor', group: :production

I read and tried the suggestions of the (too) numerous SO questions about Rails assets not compiling but none worked as I'll describe further down.

The issue observed which led me to this SO question is that my my javascript application.js file was NOT minified in production.

How do I know? the white spaces are still here, the comments have not been removed, well the applciation.js, contrary to my application.css, is just a concatenatation of all js files but NO compressing/minifying has been done.

Most questions on SO deal with issues where neither images, css or js is minified/precompilied but my situation is peculiar to the extent that images, css are precompiled/minified, but only js is a problem and is not minified.

Is there a problem with my js? (see below for some experiments I tried to find out the reason of the bug) Seems not

My set up below will show you how I deal with assets (to the extent of my beginner understanding) : I use guard to constantly monitor any change and precompile stuff and put the resulting/generated application-tr56d7.css (fingerprinted) and application-45dsugdsy67.js ((fingerprinted) inside public/assets and then when I deploy on git, it pushes all changes , including the precompiled/minified files and then when I push to Heroku, my production asset settings say to Rails to deploy my already precompiled assets. I'm a beginner and struggled with understanding all the numerous dev/prod environment assets settings but I think that is what is defined in the code you'll find further down.

I know all this process it's working because everytime i change a file when I can find a new application-tr56d7.css and a new application-45dsugdsy67.js(examples of course) (along with a new css.gz and.js.z which must be the binary stuff)

Every time I change a js file for example, guard make his job and I can read something like:

The messenger Send API gives me back the response (#546) The type of file you're trying to attach isn't allowed. Please try again with a different format. error code: 546, error_subcode: 154502

However, if I host the same exact image on Google Cloud instead of Amazon S3, then the image sends fine.

My link to the AWS image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/paloma-staging-public/files/conversation-step-56-80925.gif

My link to the google cloud image: https://storage.googleapis.com/callparty/thumbsup.gif

are there any special reasons that a link to an image stored on S3 would not work as an image attachment, but a link to an image stored on google cloud would work?

I am trying to query this Mongodb object but can't seem to get to certain data points that I need. How do I get to say the imagePath data? The data is saved in a table called orders. I have tried dot notation i.e. order.cart[0] but can't figure out how to get deeper in the array.