pidly | A super simple daemon library
kandi X-RAY | pidly Summary
kandi X-RAY | pidly Summary
Pidly is a very minimalistic daemon library that doesn't make assumptions. Pidly allows you to control the daemon without getting in the way with forced verbose output and usage messages.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Stop the process .
- Raises the callback method .
- Execute the callback
- Log a message
- Recursively creates directories and create the log file
- Returns the class for a given class name
- Add callback function .
- Clean up the logfile
- Fetch pid from PID
- Registers a stop callback .
pidly Key Features
pidly Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on pidly
QUESTION
I'm trying to follow the beginner tutorial at training.play-with-docker.com. At Task 2, step 6, I do the following and get the error as below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-11 at 16:07A part of the problem is that you're using the wrong mapping. The application uses the port 80, but you're mapping the ports 1337 to 1337.
The correct command should be:
QUESTION
I have a large Python service that runs on a desktop PC, and I need to have it run as part of a K8S deployment. I expect that I will have to make several small changes to make the service run in a deployment/pod before it will work.
ProblemSo far, if I encounter an issue in the Python code, it takes a while to update the code, and get it deployed for another round of testing. For example, I have to:
- Modify my Python code.
- Rebuild the Docker container (which includes my Python service).
scp
the Docker container over to the Docker Registry server.docker load
the image, update tags, and push it to the Registry back-end DB.- Manually kill off currently-running pods so the deployment restarts all pods with the new Docker image.
This involves a lot of lead time each time I need to debug a minor issue. Ideally, I've prefer being able to just modify the copy of my Python code already running on a pod, but I can't kill it (since the Python service is the default app that is launched, with PID=1
), and K8S doesn't support restarting a pod (to my knowledge). Alternately, if I kill/start another pod, it won't have my local changes from the pod I was previously working on (which is by design, of course; but doesn't help with my debug efforts).
Is there a better/faster way to rapidly deploy (experimental/debug) changes to the container I'm testing, without having to spend several minutes recreating container images, re-deploying/tagging/pushing them, etc? If I could find and mount (read-write) the Docker image, that might help, as I could edit the data within it directly (i.e. new Python changes), and just kill pods so the deployment re-creates them.
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Apr-26 at 19:30There are two main options: one is to use a tool that reduces or automates that flow, the other is to develop locally with something like Minikube.
For the first, there are a million and a half tools but Skaffold is probably the most common one.
For the second, you do something like ( eval $(minikube docker-env) && docker build -t myimagename . )
which will build the image directly in the Minikube docker environment so you skip steps 3 and 4 in your list entirely. You can combine this with a tool which detects the image change and either restarts your pods or updates the deployment (which restarts the pods).
Also FWIW using scp
and docker load
is very not standard, generally that would be combined into docker push
.
QUESTION
I don't know how to word this issue properly as English being my second language but essentially I am trying to create new table forEach
results property in the array. Here is what my response from API looks like.
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-12 at 14:51don't do foreach. When you get the response from the http call just do
QUESTION
I'm running a Django app on uwsgi with an average of 110 concurrent users and 5 requests per second during peak hours. I'm finding that when I deploy with uwsgi reload
during these peak hours I am starting to run into an issue where workers keep getting slowly killed and restarted, and then the uwsgi logs begin to throw an error:
ANSWER
Answered 2018-May-29 at 17:59On uwsgi there is a harakiri mode that will periodically kill long running processes to prevent unreliable code from hanging (and effectively taking down the app). I would suggest looking there for why your processes are being killed.
As to why a hard stop works and a graceful stop does not -- it seems to further indicate your application code is hanging. A graceful stop will send SIGHUP
, which allows resources to be cleaned up in the application. SIGINT
and SIGTERM
follow the harsher guidelines of "stop what you are doing right now and exit".
Anyway, it boils down to this not being a uwsgi
issue, but an issue in your application code. Find what is hanging and why. Since you are not noticing CPU spikes; some probable places to look are...
- blocking connections
- locks
- a long
sleep
Good luck!
QUESTION
I occasionally need to extract data from a large XML database export. The file size is between 600 and 700 MBs. With a few days of research I concluded that XML::Twig
is the way to go, because its handlers allow me to process the file chunk-by-chunk.
I followed the examples, and with some hours of trial and error I wrote the Perl code that performed the job I needed to do. The code worked, it extracted the data I wanted and calculated the details I needed. But while running the script (took about 15 minutes to process the 620MBs XML) I noticed in Activity Monitor that towards the end the memory usage quickly increases to an unreasonably high level.
I removed the Perl code that processes the XML tag I was interested in and replaced it with a single instruction to increment a variable, simply counting how many of product
elements had been found. The memory usage was similar. First normal, then towards the final few elements it started to rapidly increase and eat up everything I have.
I added some code to monitor time, the number of items processed, and how much memory my Perl process is using. This code is shown here:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Nov-19 at 02:57You're building a complete XML data structure except for product
elements, only to discard it all at the end
You don't say what you actually want to do with the data, but if you provide twig_handlers
then XML::Twig
is expecting to produce a filtered/modified version of the input data
If you don't want any output XML at all, or you want to build your own rather than modifying the input, then I suggest you use twig_roots
instead, like this
This is untested code. I'm travelling at present and nowhere near a PC system to test with
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install pidly
On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page