my-compiler | Compiling for Original language

by mizukmb Ruby Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | my-compiler Summary

my-compiler is a Ruby library. my-compiler has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Compiling for Original language.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

my-compiler has a low active ecosystem.

It has 4 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are no watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

my-compiler has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of my-compiler is current.

Quality

my-compiler has no bugs reported.

Security

my-compiler has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

my-compiler is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

my-compiler releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of my-compiler

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

my-compiler Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for my-compiler.

my-compiler Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for my-compiler.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on my-compiler

Compile GCC 7 : error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

C++ Stroustrup's "std_lib_facilities.h" String struct – warning: comparison of unsigned expression

Is an object fully constructed at the end of the initialiser list?

QUESTION

Compile GCC 7 : error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

Asked 2017-May-03 at 14:57

Trying to build GCC 7.1.0 from source. This is not my first time and it used to work in past GCC releases.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-May-03 at 14:57

CPP should not point to g++; CPP is the C preprocessor, so make it point to the C preprocessor:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43763527

QUESTION

C++ Stroustrup's "std_lib_facilities.h" String struct – warning: comparison of unsigned expression

Asked 2017-Mar-23 at 06:28

I am trying to get Stroustrup's "std_lib_facilities.h" header file (which is here: http://stroustrup.com/Programming/PPP2code/std_lib_facilities.h) to compile correctly in macOS Sierra, Sublime Text 3 (via build systems), Apple LLVM version 8.0.0 (clang-800.0.38). I have been fiddling with various settings but have not been able to avoid two warnings, even though the beginning "Hello, World!" program is compiling and running:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Mar-23 at 06:28

I would remove the i<0|| part and proceed.

Yes, the father of C++ is also human :)

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42968485

QUESTION

Is an object fully constructed at the end of the initialiser list?

Asked 2017-Jan-19 at 19:18

This is a spinoff from invoking the copy constructor within the constructor.

I believe that an object is fully formed and can be expected to behave as such by the end of the initialiser list (edit: I was wrong about this though!). Specifically, member functions and accessing local state from within the constructor itself will behave exactly as they would from any other member function.

This seems to be a slightly contentious point of view though, the alternative is that only once the constructor has returned normally is the object fully formed.

The following is a quick & dirty test case for this which shows all the member fields that are mentioned in the initialiser list being initialised and those that aren't getting default constructed.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Jan-19 at 19:18

Is an object fully constructed at the end of the initialiser list?

No it is not. The object this is fully constructed at the end of the execution of the constructor.

However, all the members are constructed by the end of the initializer list.

The difference is subtle but it is important as it relates to the execution of the destructors. Every constructed member and base class is destructed if the this object throws an exception during the execution of the constructor. The destructor of the this object will only execute once it is fully constructed.

From the cppreference:

For any object of class or aggregate types if it, or any of its subobjects, is initialized by anything other than the trivial default constructor, lifetime begins when initialization ends.

For any object of class types whose destructor is not trivial, lifetime ends when the execution of the destructor begins.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41665036

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install my-compiler

You can download it from GitHub.
On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: