forty | Postgres ACL as code : manage users , groups and permissions | Authorization library

Looping on a list while modifying it is usually not recommended, and can bring to strange bugs. The standard idiom is to loop over a copy as in for e in tokens[:] but in this case it would be complicated since you would need to update your i variable. I'd suggest a different approach, i.e. to consume the input list in a while loop:

Take a look at yup before you write your own validation logic. Im quite sure they have a solution to your problem. Once you wrote up your field validation scheme, you can use it in your Formik component like:

Well, the issue is what context, when and how to use that sample code?

That code looks to convert a number like 123.00 to "One Hundred and Twenty Three"

So, that's fine. But now the issue is WHEN/HOW/WHERE/WHAT context you want such code? We can't just take code and throw it against the wall. Like all software, the FIRST step before writing ONE like of code is to state the problem.

So, we could state the problem like this:

I want a text box on a form. I enter a number into that text box. I then run + use that sample code to convert the number into a text value, and then display that result in a 2nd text box.

So before you asked how to use that code, your failure here is not laying out the problem and describing what you attempted? Stack overflow can't give an answer to biology, or how to do brain surgery in one post. But you can ask how to use a scalpel to say cut a particular type of muscle tissue. SO ONLY works if you laid out the problem FIRST and then note where you run into trouble.

So, in your case without a first defined problem? how to use that code? Well we have ZERO clue how you want to use that code. maybe your supposed to create a PDF file with check amounts and you want that PDF to be downloaded, and then sent to a printer. Maybe you want that simple web form where you enter a number, and it is then displayed as text/words. There is a billion possible use cases for that code. And without some context to how/when/why/for what/ you going to use that code? Then we have next to nothing to go on. As I stated, this is a Q + A forum, not some university that going to teach you anymore then when you ask for cooking advice. no one going to come to your place and cook your dinner for you. But you can ask in a cooking forum for tips and ideas on how to cook eggs.

So, looking at that code? Well it has several parts. One part that JUMPS out is this is setup to be a web method. But wiring up JavaScript and web methods? That some rather advanced fancy stuff to start out with.

That's also why it near always better to define the problem, and what you trying to do. As opposed to say: how do I administer medicine to patients? (too broad). Or how do I use some code? (too broad - we have no idea what you trying to do here).

However, lets define the problem, and THEN see how we use that code. As noted, I would be going far beyond what is a practical approach for SO questions.

So, lets drop those two text boxes on a web form, and then use that code.

First, lets create a standard code module and put that code into that routine. So, to the project add->new item, and under visual base choose code module. We will thus have this:

Now I collapsed the routines - no need to be rude and post large amounts of code - especially when you already done so. So our code module will look like this:

Note how I DID add "public" to that first function. So change it from private to public.

Other then that? Note how we took JUST the code - not the extra web method and extra stuff - we don't need all that stuff. So, we just pulled + dumped the code into a standard code module. (we did not include the extra bits and parts - we don't need them.

So, quite much the same as say VB6, or even how you would do this in MS-Access. We create a module (default was module1), and then put our needed functions and subs into that code module - works the same as VB6 or ms-access. So in VB6, or say ms-access? Well, it is typical to dump general routines such as this into that code module - and then you are free to call + use those routines anyplace you like.

Ok, so we saved the above - module1 (that's the default assuming this is the first module you created in that project.

Ok, now lets create a web form, drop in those two text boxes, and the button.

We will have this markup:

You can use num2words module -

Your problem seems to be that document.querySelector("#searchbutton") returns null so that but1.addEventListener('click', searchClick); fails. Instead of searching for the reason I skipped adding a listener and directly attached the onclick function with

The code you are showing us is not matching but rather assigning the value 111 to the first item of the digitGroupsArray.

How many items has digitGroupsArray? I don't know, it depends on the 'groups' variable value, which we can't see in the code excerpt.

Here:

can_be_won(game) causes the variable game to be moved into the function. When you then call say_winning_situation(game) the variable has already moved and cant be used anymore. The Rust compile can actually check these things.

The compiler suggests that you clone the game in the first invocation, so it will be copied instead of moved.

You probably want to use references instead of values in your functions. Only take ownership when you need it. For reading access a reference (which is const by default) is your first choice.

You should read about borrow checking in Rust.

I found a work around to this issue by simply transforming the dataset to a Numpy ndarray.

You are evaluating each digit as a separate number and printing it as such. Your program needs to deal with the special case of 10-19 by creating a new function like this: