brakeman | static analysis security vulnerability scanner for Ruby | Security library
kandi X-RAY | brakeman Summary
kandi X-RAY | brakeman Summary
Brakeman is a static analysis tool which checks Ruby on Rails applications for security vulnerabilities.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Set up Rails 3 . 1 . 3 . 3 . 3 . 3
- Loads the default configuration .
- Parses the AST list of files .
- Parse a template
- Search for a given constant .
- Parse ERB template
- Process the given template
- compile a filter
- Saves warning to file
- Parse a conditional expression on expression
brakeman Key Features
brakeman Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on brakeman
QUESTION
I have the following partial _filters.html.haml
which has been used many times in my code:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-04 at 18:14This doesn't actually allow user controlled method execution since params[:controller]
and params[:action]
are set by the Rails router and will override any user provided values.
It is very stinky though. A slight improvement would be to use the controller_name
helper method:
QUESTION
Im planning to use brakeman in my ruby app , is there any way to use brakeman in rubymine ? (able to configure robocop)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-17 at 11:34At the moment there's no plugin for that, but there's a feature request on RubyMine's tracker for adding support to Brakeman so your vote is welcome: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RUBY-17517
QUESTION
I have my function code like this :
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-01 at 08:58I think it is not a good idea to test standard library methods. Just cover it with
QUESTION
I'm currently working on a solution for doing redirects in RoR because I got an error within the brakeman report saying that I have to fix redirects in a proper way. I understand what the message says and how to solve it within one controller action. But now I got the following. During the instantiation of the new method I set the HTTP_REFERER header which can be used in the create action.
This is giving me a Brakeman warning which can be found on the following link
Suppose I got the following controller with multiple endpoints:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-26 at 12:21The main problem in your code is that params[:referer]
can be set by your user (or an attacker forging a link for your user) to an arbitrary value by appending ?referer=https://malicious.site
to the url. You will then redirect to that, which is an open redirect vulnerability.
You could also argue that the referer
header is technically user input, and you will be redirecting to it, but I would say in most cases and modern browsers that would probably be an acceptable risk, because an attacker does not really have a way to exploit it (but it might depend on the exact circumstances).
One solution that immediately comes to mind for similar cases would be the session - but on the one hand this is a rest api if I understand correctly, so there is no session, and on the other hand, it would still not be secure against an attacker linking to your #new
endpoint from a malicious domain.
I think you should validate the domain before you redirect to it. If there is a common pattern (like for example if all of these are subdomains of yourdomain.com), validate for that. Or you could have your users register their domains first before you redirect to it (see how OAuth2 works for example, you have to register your app domain first before the user can get redirected there with a token).
If your user might just come from anywhere to #new
and you want to send them back wherever they came from - that I think is not a good requirement, you should probably not do that, or you should carefully assess the risk and consciously accept it if you want to for some reason. In most cases there is a more secure solution.
QUESTION
I have updated my rails api application from 5.1 to 5.2.
I am using rails api only.
I am trying to use the active storage. I think the problem is due to the line config.api_only = true
in config/application.rb
.
I did lot of google but did not find any thing how to use active storage in rails api.
Here is my Gemfile
:
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-10 at 06:43Try running command in the project root
QUESTION
Okay so I'm using AASM in my Rails app to manage workflows around my User model. In the view layer, I want to make a little dropdown that displays all the available transitions for a given user and perform that transition when clicked, which adjusts dynamically depending on what state the user is in. It works okay. Here's the basic implementation:
views/admin/users/index.html.erb:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-03 at 00:11Is there a better method for implementing this? Maybe some kind of generic transition action in the controller that has the transition passed in? Seems cleaner, interested to hear if anyone else has taken this approach.
How about something along the lines of:
QUESTION
I'm using ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute to insert data to database. After running brakeman report I get this warning : "Possible SQL injection"
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-27 at 07:10The problem is the interpolation you're doing to create the statement.
QUESTION
I am migrating an application from Rails 4 to Rails 5 but am struggling to get a complete bundle due to dependency conflicts. I am a bit confused as to why this is a problem as I don't completely understand why the bundler cannot resolve the dependencies.
In this case, I am on Windows. I have installed Ruby 2.5.5 using BitNami Ruby and installed Rails 5.2.3. I deleted Gemfile.lock and ran bundle install. The Gemfile specifies Ruby 2.5.5 and Rails 5.2.3. No other gems have version requirements specified. Bundle is at 1.17.3.
My interest on this issue, other converting this particular application, is to better understand how bundle resolves dependencies. Looking at the bundler documentation, I haven't discovered the reason for some conflicts. As an example, why would the bundler not accept actionpack 5.2.3 in this case:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-02 at 10:27I would suggest you to update your bundle by running "bundle update" than run bundle install
QUESTION
I'm using the following gems in a Rails 5.2 app.
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Aug-13 at 18:40It's raising that error because the latest version of Brakeman (4.5.1) changed the class of warning.file
from a String
to a Brakeman::FilePath
.
guard-brakeman
really should have been using Brakeman::Warning#relative_path
all along, but unfortunately it was (wrongly) removed in Brakeman 4.5.1.
In short, please try pinning to Brakeman 4.5.0 for now and wait for either the next Brakeman or guard-brakeman release to address this issue.
I have opened https://github.com/guard/guard-brakeman/pull/36 and https://github.com/presidentbeef/brakeman/pull/1365.
Issues like this should probably be reported as bugs to the projects instead of being asked on StackOverflow.
Update: guard-brakeman 0.8.4 fixes this issue.
QUESTION
I'm using the given regex expression to validate the username:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-25 at 02:17From ruby on rails guides regular expressions
To fix the regular expression, \A and \z should be used instead of ^ and $, like
/\A[a-zA-Z0-9_\.]*\z/
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install brakeman
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page