autodoc | Generate documentation from your rack application | REST library
kandi X-RAY | autodoc Summary
kandi X-RAY | autodoc Summary
You can write more detailed descriptions with let(:description).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- The body of the response body
- Create a request .
- Get the response .
- Extract headers from headers
- Initializes the request headers
- Get the description of the description
- Returns the example instance
- Serialize headers
- Writes all the documents into the table .
- Returns the full path for the document .
autodoc Key Features
autodoc Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on autodoc
QUESTION
When I run make html
with sphinx autodoc enabled, the functions' docstrings are not the actual docstrings.
I have the path configured in my conf.py file
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-06 at 12:07I fixed the issue. It was giving a "no module found" error.
QUESTION
I need to use SWIG to support both Python 2.7 and Python 3.10. [Yes, I know that Python 2.7 is dead, and we're doing our best to migrate users away from it as quickly as we can.]
I generate my module via setuptools.setup
with a Swig extension. I can run the setup using both Python2 and Python3. The setuptools
program creates a separate shareable library for the Python2 and Python3 runs. However both runs generate a myswig.py
file in the same location.
It turns out that the Py2 and Py3 generated files are identical, except that the Py3 generated file contains annotations for the functions and the Py2 doesn't. Python3 can read the Python2 generated file and works just fine. Python2 cannot read the Python3 generated file.
I've tried both %feature("autodoc", 0);
and leaving out this line completely, and I still get annotations.
So is there someway of either:
- Turning off annotations in the generated file
- Adding
from __future__ import annotations
automatically to the generated file
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-05 at 01:28Don't use -py3
. It's not required for Python 3, but enables Python 3-specific code features like annotations.
QUESTION
In the documentation about sphinx extensions are some "config values". e.g. in sphinx.ext.autodoc.
But I do not know how to set these values. Is it a parameter on the shell I have to set?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-03 at 19:42There's a page on the docs that teaches how to use extensions. The page is here: https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/index.html
In this page you have the following description:
A list of strings that are module names of extensions. These can be extensions coming with Sphinx (named sphinx.ext.*) or custom ones.
This tells you that sphinx.ext.*
are the built-ins extensions (You can confirm that from here)
Basically when it states some kind of configuration, it refers to the conf.py
file that is generated when you run sphinx-quickstart
, which is a quick-setup command for sphinx in general (Might be a good read: https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/quickstart.html)
The root directory of a Sphinx collection of plain-text document sources is called the source directory. This directory also contains the Sphinx configuration file conf.py, where you can configure all aspects of how Sphinx reads your sources and builds your documentation.
Sphinx comes with a script called sphinx-quickstart that sets up a source directory and creates a default conf.py with the most useful configuration values from a few questions it asks you.
Note that, as it's built-in, it's already setupped with your sphinx project.
But if you want to customize it somehow, you can use conf.py file with autodoc_*
configurations (As listed here)
There are also some notes that might be useful for your case
For Sphinx (actually, the Python interpreter that executes Sphinx) to find your module, it must be importable. That means that the module or the package must be in one of the directories on sys.path – adapt your sys.path in the configuration file accordingly.
QUESTION
According to the writing docstrings tutorial of Sphinx, it is possible to utilize Sphinx's autodoc
extension to automatically generate documentation. We can either write docstring with the Sphinx
format, Google
or Numpy
(the latter two with the napoleon
extension).
Is it possible to write docstrings in reStructuredText format?
e.g.:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-24 at 10:47Thanks to @mzjin's answer in the comments: this link describes that it is possible since v0.4
.
The below example is given in the link, which is exactly what I was looking for.
QUESTION
I have a project including a Python package as well as some Matlab code, which should all go into the same documentation created by Sphinx. The Python part of the documentation works flawlessly quite some time already - the Matlab part was added now and makes some trouble.
The data structure more or less is as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-21 at 09:28Neither providing a hard-coded absolute path to matlab_src_dir
nor providing os.path.abspath(relative_path)
lead to success.
Thanks to Steve Piercy, who mentioned an example in the comments, I found that I should use os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(relative_path))
. As such, the errors are gone and Sphinx is working.
This is interesting, because I have already tried os.path.abspath(relative_path to the parent of the package)
before, which I would expect is doing the same than os.path.dirname()
. Anyway, I got a working solution now.
If anybody would have an idea about the second question ("is there any similar function as apidoc for Matlab files, so that I do not need to create all *.rst files myself?") I would be really happy.
QUESTION
I have a free private github repo. I would like to have in a docs
folder the docstrings turned into rst files.
This is what sphinx does, but generate html
instead of rst
.
For all rst files generated this way (let's imagine one rst file per python module), I intend to hyperlink it from the readme to have access to the code documentation this way (without having to rely on github pages, which I have no access to, given I have a free account).
Please, is this possible?
Ideally, I would need a way to tell sphinx autodoc
extension to generate documentation in rst instead of html, but I haven't found a way for this.
Is there another lib for this?
Thanks for any help, Bests,
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-06 at 19:01As proposed in comment from @mzjn, I used sphinxcontrib-restbuilder
for this purpose.
Hyperlinks work, this is perfect for my need.
I applied it on the sphinx documentation of a public project of mine, and uploaded it on this github repo for those willing to have a look.
Click on index.rst
and follow the read. There do be some glitches.
The API is documented in api.rst
. This is really this part that is of interest for me.
I think it is nice enough.
QUESTION
I'm doing a really simple example and can't get it to work. I just have one file, simulator.py
that I added numpy style docstrings to. It does not import any other libraries. It has an __init__
and I can import it from a python interpreter. My directory structure is as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-31 at 08:35I think the problem comes from sys.path.insert(0, os.path.abspath('..'))
. You're actually adding modules
to the Python path, so import simulator
would import modules/simulator
and not modules/simulator/simulator
as you would like.
You should rather do:
QUESTION
I am a beginner in documentation with Sphinx. I wanted to produce numpy style documentations. Therefore, I used numpydoc extension. Numpy uses pydata
theme, however I chose furo
. I understand that there will be some differences in appearance, but I expected my page to have the same format as numpy's at least, though I get the parameter names, and types capitalized. Descriptions are not capitalized.
My docstring:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-02 at 17:47Note: The issue has been fixed in Furo 2022.1.2.
It's definitely the theme. Probably an oversight, or even a bug, as Furo shouldn't change capitalization of identifiers and types in the API documentation. But it does, here, by applying the CSS property text-transform: uppercase
.
You can override it with a custom style. In your docs
folder, create a subfolder style
, and in it a file custom.css
with this content:
QUESTION
I am trying to document constants derived from mocked imports (foo.FOO)
foo.py
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-28 at 12:54This was actually a bug and has been fixed https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/9905
QUESTION
I am trying to generate Sphinx documentation for my Python application. Originally I had a complex structure as follows...
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-30 at 15:57Ok... feeling pretty dumb about this, but it was just cause of the warnings.
Sphinx requires that the package is a fully installable package in the sense that when it is placed in the sphinx package, it should be able to compile. I had some absolute references in my import statements which caused my program to fail. As such, the actual docstrings in my program could not be pulled while the names of the classes still showed in my sphinx html.
Basically make sure your code compiles when trying to throw it in Sphinx.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install autodoc
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page