rubocop-rspec | Code style checking for RSpec files | Code Analyzer library
kandi X-RAY | rubocop-rspec Summary
kandi X-RAY | rubocop-rspec Summary
RSpec-specific analysis for your projects, as an extension to RuboCop.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of rubocop-rspec
rubocop-rspec Key Features
rubocop-rspec Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on rubocop-rspec
QUESTION
Im running ruby version 2.6.1 with docker. Rake gem is version 13.0.1.
Whenever I tried docker-compose up, it always fails and throws this error everytime:
This error did not exist before.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-23 at 12:27I'm not really sure what happened and why but I tried doing this on my rails container and I was no longer receiving the said error.
docker-compose run --rm bash
cd to project directory
bundle install
QUESTION
Running brew doctor
the output is too long for the shell. Below is what I can still reach.
Any idea what the warning (or error) for these might be and how to fix it?
Some system info:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-12 at 01:53Try doing brew update-reset
. Do make a note of the following, however:
QUESTION
I'm writing an RSpec request spec, which looks roughly like (somewhat shortened for brevity):
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-19 at 07:18have you thought not to mock current_user
at all?
if you write a test helper to sign in a user
before your request spec, current_user
will be populate automatically as if it was a real user. The code would look like this:
QUESTION
I have an initializer to load some data from a csv file to a global variable to be used in a model. Right now it looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-18 at 22:571) Well, you could wrap Hash[*CSV.open...]
into some helper class or module, say, DataLoader
, cover it with tests and then invoke like XYZ = DataLoader.do_stuff(filename)
in your initializer.
But there is one "issue" with this approach: the class will be really "dumb" (adding no custom logic at all, just wrapping a couple of methods from stdlib) and will be used in an initializer only - so will be called just once. I doubt all this additional boilerplate worth it.
So, I'd probably consider something simpler:
2) Just ignore (disable) this particular cop for this particular case. Conventions are good and rubocop
is just great, but sometimes breaking the rules leads to a cleaner code than blindly following them. For example, I sometimes add tests for destructive rake tasks - in this case, I have to break this convention too, and I do it when necessary because it is still better than artificial workarounds for the sake of conventions... Need to test a minor piece of initializer's logic? Just do it :)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install rubocop-rspec
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page