amqp | Prefer Bunny | Pub Sub library
kandi X-RAY | amqp Summary
kandi X-RAY | amqp Summary
RabbitMQ is an open source messaging middleware that emphasizes interoperability between different technologies (for example, Java, .NET, Ruby, Python, Node.js, Erlang, Go, C and so on). Key features of RabbitMQ are very flexible yet simple routing and binary protocol efficiency. RabbitMQ supports many sophisticated features, for example, message acknowledgements, queue length limit, message TTL, redelivery of messages that couldn't be processed, load balancing between message consumers and so on.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Retrieves message from queue
- Bind a queue to a queue .
- Declare a queue .
- Reset incoming options .
- Register callback for delivery
- Start a RabbitMQ thread
- Kills the job in RabbitMQ
- Stops an AMQM thread
- Convenience method .
amqp Key Features
amqp Examples and Code Snippets
@Bean
@ConditionalOnProperty(
value = "amqp.configuration.current",
havingValue = "simple-dlq")
public SimpleDLQAmqpContainer simpleAmqpContainer() {
return new SimpleDLQAmqpContainer(rabbitTemplate);
}
@Bean
public AmqpAdmin amqpAdmin() {
return new RabbitAdmin(connectionFactory());
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(AmqpServer.class, args);
}
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on amqp
QUESTION
I need to push messages to external rabbitmq. My java configuration successfully declares queue to push, but every time I try to push, I have next exception:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 07:19I'm struggling to understand how that code fits together, but this part strikes me as definitely wrong:
QUESTION
How do I put my RabbitMq exchange to an asyncapi definition?
In the examples I found this ...
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 19:02There is an entire exchange
property you can use for the channel binding for AMQP. The binding you are currently using is the operation binding.
This means that you can define it as such
QUESTION
I'm developing an api that communicates with other services from an event architecture using RabbitMQ Topics. Several routes from my API will publish events and I would like to have a single live connection at all times in my API. That way, at every new request I just create a new channel, and keep only one connection (I decided to do this after reading about how expensive an amqp 0-9-2 connection is).
For now I have something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 07:52form the official pika documentation
Is Pika thread safe?
Pika does not have any notion of threading in the code. If you want to use Pika with threading, make sure you have a Pika connection per thread, created in that thread. It is not safe to share one Pika connection across threads, with one exception: you may call the connection method add_callback_threadsafe from another thread to schedule a callback within an active pika connection.
so your solution can work with a single thread
QUESTION
I have a hard time understanding why Request and Response are parameterized in F.
Taking something similar is the cats effect datatype Resource.
From the documentation
https://typelevel.org/cats-effect/docs/std/resource
We find the following definition
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 11:50Let's see the definition for Http[F, G]
, which is at the core of http4s
:
QUESTION
We really tried a lot but it still can not get the Symfony RabbitMQ bundle (https://github.com/php-amqplib/RabbitMqBundle) running in AWS (with Docker). AWS only allows AMQPS and port 5671 to be opened in the AWS managed service.
This is our current configuration in detail:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 09:33Finally solved - you have to define a custom AMQPChannel with a custom AMQPConnection with SSL options and then set this AMQPChannel to the producer:
QUESTION
Setup: 3 node cluster of rabbitmq nodes(via docker), behind ha-proxy.
Version:
- RabbitMQ: 3.8.11
- Erlang: 23.2.3
- Spring-amqp: 1.7.3
Spring-boot(1.5.4) app with 3 queues.
- defined as "exclusive", durable, auto-delete is false
- defined as "SAC", durable, auto-delete is false
- classic, durable, auto-delete is false
Policy:
Scenario:
- When application starts at first, queues are registered correctly.
- I bring down any node at random, if it is master node, the mirroring is triggered and one of the mirrored node becomes master.All fine so far.
- When I bring that node up, it is when I start to get exceptions in the application logs:
Logs:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-18 at 21:25Boot 1.5.x and Spring AMQP 1.7.x are end of life and no longer supported.
That said, the following applies to 1.7.x too.
This situation will occur if queue recovery takes longer then 15 seconds (by default).
This is controlled by 2 container properties.
QUESTION
I'm running Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.17.0 inside VM for a month now and just noticed that after around 90 always connected MQTT clients Artemis broker is not accepting new connections. I need Artemis to support at least 200 MQTT clients.
What could be the reason for that? How can I remove this "limit"? Could the VM resources like low memory be causing this?
After restarting Artemis service, all connection are dropped, and I'm able to connect again.
I was receiving this message in logs:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-05 at 14:53ActiveMQ Artemis has no default connection limit. I just wrote a quick test based on this which uses the Paho 1.2.5 MQTT client. It spun up 500 concurrent connections using both normal TCP and WebSockets. The test finished in less than 20 seconds with no errors. I'm just running this test on my laptop.
I noticed that your journal-buffer-timeout
is 700000
which seems quite high which means you have a very low write speed of 1.43 writes per millisecond (i.e. a slow disk). The journal-buffer-timeout
that is calculated, for example, on my laptop is 4000
which translates into a write-speed of 250 which is significantly faster than yours. My laptop is nothing special, but it does have an SSD. That said, SSDs are pretty common. If this low write-speed is indicative of the overall performance of your VM it may simply be too weak to handle the load you want. To be clear, this value isn't related directly to MQTT connections. It's just something I noticed while reviewing your configuration that may be indirect evidence of your issue.
The journal-buffer-timeout
value is calculated and configured automatically when the instance is created. You can re-calculate this value later and configure it manually using the bin/artemis perf-journal
command.
Ultimately, your issue looks environmental to me. I recommend you inspect your VM and network. TCP dumps may be useful to see perhaps how/why the connection is being reset. Thread dumps from the server during the time of the trouble would also be worth inspecting.
QUESTION
I am using docker compose with a .net core service and RabbitMQ. I try to connect to rabbitMQ from a different service. I've seen many questions but none of them worked or had an answer.
I know you should not use 'localhost' to connect with another service but the name you gave in the docker-compose file.
I am really curious about the answer!
What I tried
- Add depends on in the docker compose file
- Add links in the docker compose file
- Add restart: always in the docker compose file
- Changed the connection link to : amqp://guest:guest@rabbitmq:5672
- Changed the connection link to : amqp://guest:guest@rabbitmq/
- Cleaned and rebuilt the solution many times
- Changed the order in the docker compose file. RabbitMQ is now Nr.1, after that the other services.
- Added container_name
- Added hostname
Here is my docker compose file
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-04 at 11:34I fixed the issue. I got the wrong package version...
QUESTION
I'm trying to work out how to fix this ActiveMQ Artemis error.
Seems the occasional message is too big for SimpleString
, and isn't sending, and it goes to the DLQ.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 17:19The 2.6.3.redhat-00015
version corresponds to AMQ 7.2.3 which is quite old at this point. The current AMQ release is 7.8.1. I strongly recommend you upgrade as it's likely you're hitting a bug that's already been fixed.
You may be able to work around the issue by increasing the minimum large message size (e.g using minLargeMessageSize
on core client URLs or amqpMinLargeMessageSize
on your AMQP acceptor
). For what it's worth, the stack-trace indicates that the core JMS client (i.e. not AMQP) is in use when the exception is thrown.
Lastly, it's worth noting that the default minimum large message size is 100 KB not 2 GB as explained in the documentation.
QUESTION
We've noticed that when erroneous messages are received to a Spring Integration Endpoint (from RabbitMQ) they are not retried. If there's a problem in our business code (i.e. the "service method" that receives the messages) so that it throws an exception, retries happen as they are supposed to.
This is our configuration:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 13:26The conversion is performed before a message is created.
Conversion errors are generally considered to be fatal - there is no point in retrying it because it will fail again.
Add an .errorChannel
to the inbound adapter; its downstream flow will get an ErrorMessage
for conversion errors.
However, it will also get error messages from the downstream flow too, so you will have to handle all error types there.
EDIT
You can add an error channel and handle the conversion exception on its flow. Bear in mind, though, that the message will be redelivered over and over again, with no delay.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install amqp
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page