rufo | opinionated ruby formatter , intended to be | Form library

by ruby-formatter Ruby Version: v0.15.1 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | rufo Summary

rufo is a Ruby library typically used in User Interface, Form applications. rufo has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

Rufo is as an opinionated ruby formatter, intended to be used via the command line as a text-editor plugin, to autoformat files on save or on demand. Unlike the best known Ruby formatter RuboCop, Rufo offers little in the way of configuration. Like other language formatters such as gofmt, prettier, and autopep8, we strive to find a "one true format" for Ruby code, and make sure your code adheres to it, with zero config where possible.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

rufo has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 811 star(s) with 57 fork(s). There are 13 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 25 open issues and 93 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 227 days. There are 2 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of rufo is v0.15.1

Quality

rufo has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

rufo has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

rufo code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

rufo is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

rufo releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed rufo and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into rufo implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Check if the given file matches the given filename .
Resolves the queue .
Add a proc to the list of targets .
Add files to the list .
Add glob to the list
Add an item to the collection
Convert a string to a string
Create a new Item .
Print debug message
Logs the given argument to STDOUT .

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

rufo Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for rufo.

rufo Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for rufo.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on rufo

How do I set VSCode path so that it picks up my rufo extension for my Ruby on Rails project?

difference in syntax of python class creation - class name_class: class name_class(): and class name_class(Object):

QUESTION

How do I set VSCode path so that it picks up my rufo extension for my Ruby on Rails project?

Asked 2022-Mar-04 at 19:22

I’m using VS Code 1.65.0 on Mac Big Sur. I have installed the rufo gem and the rufo-vscode extension (https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=siliconsenthil.rufo-vscode). After restarting VSCode, when I enter the shortcut (Cmd+Shift+I) to format a file, I get this error

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Mar-04 at 19:22

Open your settings.json in VSC and enter your which rufo output:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71355671

QUESTION

difference in syntax of python class creation - class name_class: class name_class(): and class name_class(Object):

Asked 2020-Oct-24 at 02:25

I am learning OOP with Python and I consider that I have already understood the basics to understand how to create and instantiate a class but I have a question of syntax. Reviewing different examples to practice I have been able to see that a class can be created with slight differences but that I instantiate them in the same way (without problems).

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Oct-24 at 02:24

In Python 3-only code, you'd just use the first form (because the other forms are needlessly verbose and change nothing about the behavior on Python 3).
If you need to write code that still produces new-style classes when run on Python 2, you'd use the third form, and the other forms would produce old-style classes (which are generally inferior to new-style classes in the few cases where they differ). Given that Python 2 has reached end-of-life, I'd think twice before trying to write new code that supports it.
The second form serves no purpose, and should be avoided as a case of unnecessary parentheses disease.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64509333

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network