easy_logging | Ruby utility that lets you include a unique logger
kandi X-RAY | easy_logging Summary
kandi X-RAY | easy_logging Summary
Ruby utility that lets you include a unique logger anywhere easily, without redundancy
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of easy_logging
easy_logging Key Features
easy_logging Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on easy_logging
QUESTION
I'm not sure that the title explains my problem, but I can improve it after for the moment I want to explain my problem because are several days that I'm breaking my mind over this problem.
I'm developing a static analysis for my class with Ocaml to check if my c (subset of a C language) program meaning somethings real, and I'm new with this stuff (with the language and paradigm and with the compiler stuff).
The static analysis is traversing the Abstract syntax tree (Ast) and make some checks of it (The check is a problem with TODO comment), for the moment I'm developing the data structure, in particular a Symbol Table, and implementing the code to traverse the Ast.
My complete Ast.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-02 at 12:02If I understand your problem correctly you just have to specify the mutually recursive functions explicitly. You do so using the and
keyword, just like with type definitions, but also have to use the rec
keyword because function definitions are not recursive by default, unlike type definitions:
QUESTION
New in Ocaml and I'm trying to implement a couple of functions to manage a list of a custom types.
I'm trying to manage a list of types, and when I need to add a new element to the list I need to make some checks. This is my actual code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-31 at 17:49You're omitting a lot of context here, and I had to remove references to missing modules in order to reproduce, which means I've made several assumptions that may be wrong.
Given that, my guess is that you've copied code that originally used the Base or Core standard library replacement, where the List.nth
function returns an 'a option
, as opposed to the standard OCaml implementation which will raise an exception instead if the given index is out of bounds.
The reason I think so is that the parent
field of dec
has type dec option
and is assigned last_scope
directly, which means last_scope
must have the same type. And if List.nth
has type 'a list -> int -> 'a
, then 'a
must have type dec option
, which means table
must have type dec option list
. And you can't prepend a dec
to a dec option list
, hence the error.
Lastly, a good way to find the cause of issues like this is to make your assumptions explicit by annotating the type of variables. For example, annotating the type of table
here will give you a different error, narrowing it down last_scope
having the type dec
but being expected to have type dec option
when being assigned to parent
.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install easy_logging
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page