suspenders | Rails template with our standard defaults
kandi X-RAY | suspenders Summary
kandi X-RAY | suspenders Summary
Suspenders is maintained and funded by thoughtbot, inc. The names and logos for thoughtbot are trademarks of thoughtbot, inc. We love open source software! See our other projects. We are available for hire.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Default configuration
- = begin Function to copy the tests
- setup the assets for the environment
- Configures the generator for use .
- Strip comments in the config file
- Setup the Rake task
- Configures the user s email address
- Updates the environment with default settings
- Sets defaults for the deployment
- replace the path to the gem file
suspenders Key Features
suspenders Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on suspenders
QUESTION
As usual, I'm implementing a "soft deletion" pattern (on an SQLite database): never actually delete anything on-disk, just hide it in the application.
My master table looks like:
id(INT)deleted(NULL or TEXT) ie. NULL or ISO date/time of the deletion- ...
When I want to "delete" a record I actually just set its deleted field to the current date/time.
I also have another table references that stores relationships:
id(INT, FOREIGN KEY master.id ON DELETE RESTRICT)ref(INT, FOREIGN KEY master.id ON DELETE RESTRICT)
Meaning, id has a reference to ref so you can't have it dangling.
Obviously, thanks to FOREIGN KEYs you can't actually SQL DELETE a record in the master table if it is referenced by any references.id/ref, the engine enforces that. But I'd like to extend this check, if possible, to the "soft deletion".
In other words, I'd like to forbid any SQL UPDATE of the master.deleted field from NULL to non-NULL if and only if the master.id is listed in references.id/ref.
Until now, enforcing this at the application level was enough for my needs, but on this project I really need "belt and suspenders" so the database layer should really enforce it too. And I have no clue how to begin unraveling it.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 07:25As pointed out by @Serg, triggers solve this problem.
In addition to the SQLite documentation, this tutorial greatly helped me make sense of it.
Here's what I came up with. This is my first try so it can probably be enhanced performance-wise, but the functionality is here:
QUESTION
With the following file configuration:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-08 at 11:16Pytest first finds the test files specified by paths etc., then imports them and looks for any function or class matching the configured naming conventions.
It does not inspect the test cases it finds for where they come from; if you import something into the namespace of a module, Pytest thinks it's fine there.
Your options are:
- rename that
test...function as you import it:
from my_module import testtime_func as foo_testtime_func - import the whole module and call
my_module.testtime_func:
import my_module - change the naming convention (if you really need to)
QUESTION
Does using React.PropTypes make sense in a TypeScript React Application or is this just a case of "belt and suspenders"?
Since the component class is declared with a Props type parameter:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-19 at 10:48I guess that in some messy situations where the type of the props can't be inferred at compile time, then it would be useful to see any warnings generated from using propTypes at run time.
One such situation would be when processing data from an external source for which type definitions are not available, such as an external API beyond your control. For internal APIs, I think that is worth the effort to write (or better, generate) type definitions, if they are not already available.
Other than that, I don't really see any benefit (which I why I've never used it personally).
QUESTION
I added gem 'bitfinex-rb' in rails gem file, When I do bundle install, I got below mentioned error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-29 at 13:36This is because kucoin 0.1.1 requires faraday >= 0.13 and bitfinex-rb 0.1.0 requires faraday ~> 0.9.2 (so >= 0.9.2 and <= 0.10). At least in Ruby Gems there is no higher version of bitfinex-rb so that you could update it. And the other version of kucoin (0.1.0) also requires faraday >= 0.13. So you can not install both gems (kucoin and bitfinex-rb) at the same time, because of the dependency. Bundle try to resolve the dependencies, but it can only do it if it is possible.
QUESTION
The problem is still on the drawing board so far, so I can go for another better suited approach. The situation is like this:
We create a queue of n-processes, each of which execute independently of the other tasks in the queue itself. They do not share any resources etc. However, we noticed that sometimes (depending on queue parameters) a process k's behaviour might depend on existence of a flag specific to k+1 process. This flag is to be set in a DynamoDB table, and therefore; the execution could fails.
What I am currently searching around for is a method so that I can set some sort of waiters/suspenders in my tasks/workers so that they poll until the flag is set in the DynamoDB table, and meanwhile let the other subprocess take up the CPU.
The setting of this boolean value is done a little early in the processes themselves. The dependent part of the process comes much later.
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Feb-22 at 20:52So, we went ahead with creating n number of processes instead of having a suspender. This would not be the ideal approach, but for the time being; it solves the issue at hand.
I'd still love a better method to achieve the same.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install suspenders
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
