union | An extension to ActiveRecord : :Base to support unions | Web Framework library
kandi X-RAY | union Summary
kandi X-RAY | union Summary
An extension to ActiveRecord::Base to support unions
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of union
union Key Features
union Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on union
QUESTION
I'm having trouble understanding why TypeScript is inferring a certain type for an array element when the type is a union type and the types 'overlap'. I've reduced it to this minimum repro:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 19:42See microsoft/TypeScript#43667 for a canonical answer. This is a design limitation of TypeScript.
As you might be aware: in TypeScript's structural type system, Child
is a subtype of Base
even though it is not explicitly declared as such. So every value of type Child
is also a value of type Base
(although not vice-versa). That means Child | Base
is equivalent to Base
... although the compiler is not always aggressive about reducing the former to the latter. (Compare this to the behavior with something like "foo" | string
, which is always immediately reduced to string
by the compiler.)
Subtype reduction is often desirable, but there are some places where Child | Base
's behavior is observably different from Base
's, such as excess property checks, IntelliSense hinting, or the sort of unsound type guarding that happens with the in
operator. You haven't shown why it matters to you that you are getting a Base
as opposed to a Child | Base
, but presumably it's one of these observable differences or something like it.
My advice here is first to think carefully about whether or not you really need this distinction. If so, then you might consider preventing Base
from being a subtype of Child
, possibly by adding an optional property to it:
QUESTION
Here is my situation: I have 2 tables, Question and Answer tables both containing a post_date column. I want to get the count of the questions and answers for the recent 7 days whether or not the count is 0. Refer this for the desired output
I have tried the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 17:47Use JOIN
, FULL JOIN
in fact:
QUESTION
People of Stack Overflow!
Thanks for taking the time to read this question. What I am trying to accomplish is to pivot some data all from just one table.
The original table has multiple datetime entries of specific events (e.g. when the customer was added add_time
and when the customer was lost lost_time
).
This is one part of two rows of the deals table:
I want to create a view of this table. A view that has one row for each distinct date and counts the number of events at this specific time.
This is the goal (times do not match with the example!):
I have working code, like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 17:03You can use a lateral join to unpivot and then aggregate:
QUESTION
So I was really ripping my hair out why two different sessions of R with the same data were producing wildly different times to complete the same task.
After a lot of restarting R, cleaning out all my variables, and really running a clean R, I found the issue: the new data structure provided by vroom
and readr
is, for some reason, super sluggish on my script. Of course the easiest thing to solve this is to convert your data into a tibble as soon as you load it in. Or is there some other explanation, like poor coding praxis in my functions that can explain the sluggish behavior? Or, is this a bug with recent updates of these packages? If so and if someone is more experienced with reporting bugs to tidyverse, then here is a repex
showing the behavior cause I feel that this is out of my ballpark.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 14:37This is the issue I had in mind. These problems have been known to happen with vroom, rather than with the spec_tbl_df
class, which does not really do much.
vroom
does all sorts of things to try and speed reading up; AFAIK mostly by lazy reading. That's how you get all those different components when comparing the two datasets.
With vroom:
QUESTION
I have a function that accepts an argument which can be either of type A or B. In case A is passed, it is converted to B for further processing internally.
To keep it simple, consider the following example using int/float to illustrate the scenario:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 11:41You should change your if
statement to:
QUESTION
I have this query in ORACLE SQL:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 15:49You commented that you might be using a tool (Intellij DataGrid) I don't know.
However, if you modify the query a little bit so that
- your current query is used as an inline view
- add a new -
z
- column to it - apply alias to the 2nd column to be returned (
result
) - move
where
clause out of the subquery
then this might work:
QUESTION
I have been studying and learning PHP and MySQL and I have started a system that I'm developing for a friend's little school and to help me to improve my learning. I basically have in this case a table with the names of the students (tb_std) and another with the names of the teachers (tb_tch). The work is to distribute these students among the teachers in a new table, which is the way I think it will work better (tb_final).
- I basically need each student to have a randomly chosen teacher so that the distribution is numerically even among the teachers.
In this example, I have 7 teachers and 44 students. Using SELECT query I did the operations to find out how many students would be for each teacher (add/division/mod), but how to make this draw to play in this new table I have no idea where to start.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 14:50You can solve this by next (a bit a complicate) query using window functions:
QUESTION
I have a list whose elements are integers and I would like to accumulate these elements if only they share at least one value. With regard to those elements that don't share any values with the rest I would like them to stay as they are. Here is my sample date:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 05:23I suspect there's a set covering solution to be had, but in the interim here's a graph approach:
First, let's convert the integer vectors to an edge list so it can be made into a graph. We can use expand.grid
.
QUESTION
given the following model
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-19 at 17:39You can make a .union(…)
[Django-doc] to construct the uion of the two querysets. This is thus:
QUESTION
I have the following tables:
Experiments
id authId numUpVotes 1 abcd 5 2 efgh 3 3 efgh 10Comments
id authId numUpVotes 1 abcd 2 2 abcd 2 3 efgh 1My goal is SUM all the upvotes for a given authID across both tables, and for that I have the following query:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 21:07Use UNION ALL
without WHERE
in the derived table and don't join.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install union
On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page