blab | gem allows to trace local variables | Code Inspection library
kandi X-RAY | blab Summary
kandi X-RAY | blab Summary
The gem allows to trace local variables and memory usage for Ruby code. It's intended for use in a development environment only. Blab is inspired by PySnooper.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Generate trace trace
- Print a string representation of the config .
- Prepares an object into an object .
- Returns true if the current scope is the original method
- Returns a string representation of the indentation .
- Return the source file name .
- Convert hash into hash keys
- Returns the logger instance .
- Fetch line number of lines
- Calculates the lines of the file .
blab Key Features
blab Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on blab
QUESTION
I have a JSON looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 13:59An elegant solution is to update node attributes in networkx rather than the output dict. Use nx.set_node_attributes
:
QUESTION
I have three tables:
Table A (approx. 500 000 records)
ID ID_B Text 1 10 bla 2 10 blabla 3 30 blablablaTable B (approx. 100 000 records)
ID Text 10 blab 20 blaba 30 blabbTable C (approx. 600 000 records)
ID ID_A 1 1 2 1 3 2Now I want to join this three tables:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-11 at 20:46You haven't mentioned if you have any indexes on table B. Perhaps an index on it with the identifier and 'including' any columns you want to output.
Now, from what I gather in the comments, you're really joining to tables b and c primarily as a filter, not because you need to output data from those tables. If that's really the case, you should use exists
. You may shy away from subqueries, but the engine knows what to do with exists
. You'll see in the plan that it will run a 'semi join'.
QUESTION
For example, given such a string:
I like bla blab blah chocolate I like bla blob bla cheese
I'd like to find all the strings that starts with "I like" then followed by some text and the value.
My problem is that it detects it but .*
takes everything until the end returning then one match instead of two.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-28 at 21:07You can use
QUESTION
I have 2 data sets:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-23 at 15:09I suspect you're not trying to merge on actual dates but a month so you're using a formatted value most likely. So set your dates to the beginning of the month or convert them to YYMM to merge.
QUESTION
I have a dataframe that looks something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-25 at 15:17Try
QUESTION
Ok, so, I am very new to javascript and mildy so in CSS and HTML. I'm working on a portfolio and my separate sections (for contact, illustrations, projects) were with display:hidden. I used a function for each section that I wanted to hide and display correspondingly on the screen and they were working fine up until I made some changes in the overall code. Now, two of the sections won't show up. Here is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-24 at 04:44Try doing this inside your out()
function
QUESTION
There is the following field on dynamo
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-19 at 00:08The root of the issue is that your Config
struct is incorrectly structured.
I recommend using json-to-go when converting JSON to Go structs; this tool will help you catch issues like this in the future.
Once you get your struct constructed correctly, you'll also notice that your struct fields are not capitalized, meaning they will not be exported (i.e. able to be used by other packages), which is another reason that your UnmarshalMap
code will not return the result you are expecting.
Here is a good answer on struct field visibility and its importance, briefly summarized above.
Below is a corrected version of your struct that, combined with your UnmarshalMap
code, will correctly allow you to print your item
and not receive a {}
which is no fun.
QUESTION
I hope someone can help me.
I am using nodejs and Nodemailer to connect to a company g-suite account from which I want to send emails from the address info@domain.com automatically.
Following the instructions en https://medium.com/@imre_7961/nodemailer-with-g-suite-oauth2-4c86049f778a
I have the following code inside an azure function.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-12 at 00:25It is not a nodemailer error
I fix my problem adding a missing configuration in my gmail account
YOUR_EMAIL_ADDRESS
"Gmail Send Mail As"
You could review how to add "Gmail Send Mail As" in:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Esd85pyH8I&feature=emb_logo&ab_channel=GoldyArora
Following the instructions in https://medium.com/@imre_7961/nodemailer-with-g-suite-oauth2-4c86049f778a
I confirm that the writing by Bogdan Bota works and I was able to send emails from a group email in my organization info@domain.com validating from my account cesarcas@domain.com.
Also note that you need to have access to group email, in mi case, info@domain.com to be able to validate that you can use that address to send emails.
QUESTION
This very well could be a duplicate. If so, no problem, but I didn't find exactly what I need.
I'm using this command:
Scaffold-DbContext "Server=blab blah blah" Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer -OutputDir DataModels -DataAnnotations -force
That works, but I'd like some control over which data annotations are created. In particular, every time I have a column that is a DateTime
I get this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-06 at 08:34It is possible, but cumbersome, you must implement your own ICSharpEntityTypeGenerator
and hook that into the Scaffold command via a design time factory.
Alternatively, if I understand your requirement, you would like to avoid all data annotations, except [Key], is that correct? In that case, it may be something I can implement in EF Core Power Tools. Feel free to post a feature request on GitHub.
QUESTION
I hope someone can help me
I am developing an api in dotnet, i am using azure devops and pipelines in yaml.
I have already done my 2e2 test of the api where I basically make real calls to the api that I am developing, in order to test a real user flow within the application.
My question is the following should:
1- Do the 2e2test task before the deployment to my webapp allowing me to know that there is a problem before it is deployed to the resource, but having the problem that I would not be testing with the changes of the present commit (since I would be testing with the previous one because I still I have not deployed the resource)
or
2-do the task 2e2test after the deployment to my webapp, allowing me the tests to be carried out with the changes I made in the commit reflected in the resource and in this way know that what I did gave a problem or not, but having the problem that As the resource was deployed, if there was a problem, it would already be contaminating my webapp.
the yaml I'm working on is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-16 at 20:27You should deploy first and then run your e-2-e tests but not on production. On production you should run smoke tests which are kind of e-2-e tests which test crucial parts of your app without changing state of the app. (of course it makes sense to run them after deployment)
So it could be in high-level like this:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install blab
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page