indexmap | hash table with consistent order | Hashing library

its done. cargo +nightly install --force afl --verbose

no answer but some inputs that may help:

1. I believe the media extractor and media muxer are vendor owned, google have the default cpp implementation but the vendors can override it. you can review the google implementation here: https://cs.android.com/android/platform/superproject/+/master:frameworks/av/media/libstagefright/MediaMuxer.cpp;l=173

   It helps me to solve one of the voodoo bugs in the engine related to "last frame" / time mismatch. NOTE: you need to make sure you are looking o n the right version (check the blame tool to the right).

2. the media can contain any metadata value that was pushed while creating the file. so, you can calculate it again or just use what you get.

3. did you tried to take the video that you created and then run the test when this file is the input?

The problem is that when removing an item from the source model the proxy is not notified and the "map" is not updated. One possible solution is to connect the rowsRemoved signal to the buildMap.

firebaser here

This is a known issue in the JavaScript SDK, that seems to also surface in the Admin SDK for Node.js. As far as I know there is no fix yet, but the workaround with once() is indeed valid. If I know more about a fix for the issue, I'll post it here.

You can simplify the process by starting with an object where your data array is the components prop, then it's just a single .reduce over the indexMap:

My goal is to write a class that works like a unordered_map but keeps the insertion order of the elements while still allowing O(1) lookup by key

... and without duplicating the key, in cases it's large and/or expensive.

So, you want two things:

1. a constant-time associative lookup with the same semantics as std::unordered_map (no duplicate keys, or you would/should have asked for std::unordered_multimap)
2. a sequential index tracking insertion order

You have chosen to implement the associative lookup using a sequential container, and the sequential index using an associative container. I don't know why, but let's try the more natural alternative:

1. the associative lookup should just be std::unordered_map
2. the sequential index can just be std::vector

The remaining blank is SomeValueType: it could just be VAL, but then we need to do extra work to fix the sequential index whenever we erase something. We could make it std::pair instead, so it can store the index i of the iterator we'll need to remove on erasure. The down side is that on top of moving all i+1..N vector elements down one, we also need to update the index value for each of those map elements.

If you want to preserve constant-time erasure, you probably need the sequential index to be a std::list, and to keep a std::list::iterator in your map element. Actual linear iteration will be slower on a linked list than a vector, but you get the same complexity when erasing elements.

NB. The sequential index does need to store pointers rather than iterators - I originally forgot the invalidation behaviour for unordered maps. However, if you want access to the key, they can obviously be std::unordered_map::value_type pointers ... I just wrote out the shorter alternative.

Reqwest lists OpenSSL as a requirement on Linux due to it using native-tls, which depends on openssl. You need to install the pkg-config and libssl-dev packages:

Instead of defining an array of PXDataFieldParam why don't you define a List and then use the method .ToArray() when calling the PXDatabase.Update method.

I saw two things to notice here

First is that the nested is tasks not challenges