extend | Create extensions for types you do n't own with extension | Web Framework library

By default laravel thinks that id is the primary key in your table. To fix this you would have to a primary key variable in your model

A functional approach would be (but probably not clean)

The problem is that you are using an empty notesListAll list for filtering results; you need to populate it with the list of notes in the constructor

My research of the major syntax and functionality differences from http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/tech/regexp.html:

• . in GNU grep does not match null bytes and newlines (but does match newlines when used with --null-data), while Perl, everything except \n is matched.
• [...] in GNU grep defines POSIX bracket expressions, while Perl uses "character" classes. I'm not sure on the details. See http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/tech/regexp.html#bracketexpression
• "In basic regular expressions the meta-characters ?, +, {, |, (, and ) lose their special meaning; instead use the backslashed versions \?, \+, \{, \|, \(, and \)." From https://www.gnu.org/software/grep/manual/html_node/Basic-vs-Extended.html. ERE matches PCRE syntax.
• GNU grep \w and \W are the same as [[:alnum:]] and [^[:alnum]], while Perl uses alphanumeric and underscore.
• GNU grep has \< and \> for start and end of word.

Perl supports much more additional functionality:

• "nongreedy {}" with syntax re{...}?
• additional anchors and character types \A, \C, \d, \D, \G, \p, \P, \s, \S, \X. \Z, \z.
• (?#comment)
• shy grouping (?:re), shy grouping + modifiers (?modifiers:re)
• lookahead and negative lookahead (?=re) and (?!re), lookbehind and negative lookbehind (?<=p) and (?
• Atomic groups (?>re)
• Conditional expression (?(cond)re)
• ... and more, see man pcresyntax

Nuxt makes the $config available in two ways: as this.$config on every component instance, and context.$config passed to "special nuxt lifecycle areas like asyncData, fetch, plugins, middleware and nuxtServerInit" (docs).

It looks like you need to access the $config outside a component, so you'll need to retrieve it early in the request cycle. In particular, since you're mutating the Vue.prototype, this feels like a good fit for a plugin in the Nuxt sense, which isn't quite what you've got in your code.

If you put your plugin file in the plugins directory and reference it from the plugins array in nuxt.config.js (see link above for a broader example), you could rewrite it like this to access $config:

change the type and the constructor:

The little lighter colored "ct" prompt is just a visual aid and it does not always show up. When you provide a raw value as an argument, it will show the prompt (like this, 1, or "foo"). When you provide a variable for the argument like ctx, foo, etc, it does not show up. This goes for all functions that take arguments.

The moral of the story is, it is not important and can be ignored.

If finally figured it out.

It's actually a bug in the library itself: https://github.com/testing-library/pptr-testing-library/issues/55

It seems this was implemented in:

https://github.com/vuejs/vue/commit/c7c13c2a156269d29fd9c9f8f6a3e53a2f2cac3d

This was a result of an issue raised in 2018 (https://github.com/vuejs/vue/issues/8056) , because this.$scopedSlots.default() returned both a VNode or an array of VNodes depending on the content.

The main argument was that this is inconsistent with how regular slots behave in render functions, and means any render function component rendering scoped slots as children needs to type check the result of invoking the slot to decide if it needs to be wrapped in an array

So Evan comments on the issue thread here, explaining that this.$scopedSlots.default would always return Arrays beginning v2.6 to allow for consistency, but to avoid breaking changes for how $scopedSlots was being used, the update would also allow return of an Array of a single VNode from render functions as well.