provok | Text Renderer written in Rust using HarfBuzz | Data Manipulation library

I am working on providing Android 11 support on my audio/video player app. My main concern is actually with not provoking the Google tribe with their no All files access permission allowed for player apps. I do not want my app to be rejected on publishing on the Google store.

In previous APIs, I am using WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission including Android 10 (where I opt out off Scoped Storage). Though, I do not know how to handle Android 11 without having my app rejected on publishing on Google store. I have learned that READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission is needed for querying MediaStore records and I have the following questions:

1. Will asking for READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE on runtime on Android 11 be acceptable with Google (when I publish my app on their store)?
2. Can I ask for WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission on runtime instead of READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE for all APIs and the system on Android 11 devices would substitute that for READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE or will I need to add conditions where I ask for READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE on Android 11 devices.
3. Will asking for WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE on runtime on Android 11 be acceptable with Google (when I publish my app on their store)?

I'm trying to prevent the default bahavior of reloading the page after submitting a form, to show an information and after a second or so, continue with that event(submit) that provokes the refresh.

I've done this

HTML:

I'm trying to install chrome in a docker container. I execute:

i'm currently learning about buffer overflows in c, and i'm following this video as a tutorial.

So I have the following code:

I have two lists that I use to create a dictionary, where list1 has text data and list2 is a list of tuples (text, float). I use these 2 lists to create a dictionary and the goal is to create a dataframe where each row of the first column will contain the elements of list1, each column will have a column name based on each unique text term from the first tuple element and for each row there will be the float values that connect them.

For example here's the dictionary with keys : {be, associate, induce, represent} and values : {('prove', 0.583171546459198), ('serve', 0.4951282739639282)} etc.

I have two procedures, one outer procedure and one inner procedure, where I would like to understand the behaviour of the error handling. The inner procedure provokes an error and is trying to insert something in the catch block into a table. After that the error is raised, passed to the outer procedure and then should roll back the transaction.

I'm trying to understand why my code is throwing the error message:

I have spent a few days now finding a bug that freezes my companies application. The dreaded UserPreferenceChanged UI freeze. It's not a complicated bug, but hard to find in a rather big application. There are quite a few articles about how this bug unfolds but not on how to put ones finger on the faulty code. I have put together a solution, in form of a logging mechanism from multiple older tickets and (i hope) improved a bit upon them. May it save some time for the next programmer with this problem.

How to recognize the bug?

The application freezes completely. Nothing more to be done than create a memory dump and then close it via TaskManager. If you open the dmp file in VisualStudio or WinDbg you might see a stack trace like this one

In this example below which unmaps the json from Firebase. Everywhere where I get data as Map - like orderId - its ok. But everywhere where I have map inside another map - like address - it gives me a warning

"Avoid method calls or property accesses on a "dynamic" target."

Its not critical but I found on google that it provokes productivity penalties. Can someone share why it is so and how to avoid it

Hello fellow byte crunchers,

last week we stumbled on a somewhat unexpected behavior in PHP. For our framework, we utilize the __call and __callStatic magic functions in a base class to provide some sort of functionality unrelevant for this thread. When we utilize the __callStatic function with an appropriate static call on the same class the magic function is defined while being in an object scope, for some reason, the __call method will get invoked.

Here is a minimal working example: