bm | Binary merkle tree implementation | Dataset library

We can use simple for loop,

I had this problem as well since this morning and what was odd for me was that I could SSH from the terminal to the target host with no problem.

After some debugging, it seems like the Remote - SSH extension is causing the trouble. The following two options worked for me. Either:

1. Downgrading the extension to 0.70.0 works for me. The current version (0.74.0 as of now) was updated just two days ago and I think this update is causing the trouble.

2. If you would like to keep the current version, then turning off remote.ssh.useLocalServer also works. If you're on a mac, go to Code > Preferences > Settings (Cmd + ,) and then type remote.ssh.useLocalServer and it'll show the option which is turned on by default. Turning this off did the trick for me too.

Why are you resizing the bitmap? Why are you creating a new bitmap every time onDraw is called?

Every time you resize the bitmap, you cause a magnification or minification algorithm to be applied. That's probably the cause of the distortions you're seeing.

You should create one bitmap at start, and render that in the onDraw method. The matrix you're calculating in getResizedBitmap should instead be used as an argument to this function

Try the following kind of approach:

Somewhere in your program someone is probably calling scrollToItems(at:,scrollPosition:). They either don't know the collection is empty and are just passing in (row:0, item:0) as the index path instead of just skipping the scroll call altogether. Or they think your collection contains at least one item.

To further diagnose the issue, I would either set a breakpoint on exceptions or set a breakpoint on the UIScrollView function and look at the backtrace to see who is making the call.

You also want to check your Data Source to make sure it's been updated with the correct number of items at the time the scroll happens.

But having a backtrace to find out who or what is causing the scrollview to scroll would be a great first step.

Your syntax is slightly off. Remember that the pin operator ^ pins only a single value. In your example, you were trying to pin it to 2 values.

So if the thing you are trying to match on is a binary with 2 values that you are aware of, then you would need to pin both of them, e.g.

Try updating your dependencies to the latest available versions.

'com.huawei.hms:hwid:5.3.0.301' --> 'com.huawei.hms:hwid:6.0.1.300' 'com.huawei.hms:push:5.3.0.300' --> 'com.huawei.hms:push:5.3.0.304'

Here's a link to a list of the latest SDK versions. https://developer.huawei.com/consumer/en/doc/development/HMSCore-Guides/hmssdk-kit-0000001050042513

Since you want to render to Bitmap the content of a Panel - which is hosting an external application - you cannot use Control.DrawToBitmap(): the contents of the hosted application, parented calling SetParent(), won't be printed.
Since you also want to exclude from the rendering any other Window that may be hovering over the Panel, you can use the PrintWindow function, passing the handle of the Panel's Parent Form.
The Form will receive a WM_PRINT or WM_PRINTCLIENT message and will print itself to the Device Context specified: in this case, generated from a Bitmap.

This is not a screenshot: the Window paints itself and its content to a DC, so it doesn't matter whether other Windows are hovering / partially of fully overlapping it, the result is the same.

I'm using DwmGetWindowAttribute, setting DWMWA_EXTENDED_FRAME_BOUNDS, to get the bounds of the Window to print. It may seem redundant, but, if your app is not DpiAware and you have a High-Dpi screen, it will appear less redundant in that case. Better have it, IMO.
This function is more reliable than, say, GetWindowRect or GetClientRect, it will return correct measures in variable DPI contexts.

You cannot pass the handle of a child Window to this function, so I'm using the Handle of the Parent Form to generate the Bitmap, then select the section where the Panel is located. This is determined by:

[ParentForm].RectangleToClient([Child].RectangleToScreen([Child].ClientRectangle))

Start the Process and parent Notepad's Window to the Panel control:

As the comments above say, you're comparing the libstdc++ version of all_of with the libc++ version which you copied into your code, and the libstdc++ version is faster.

As for why it's faster: std::all_of calls std::find_if_not, which calls __find_if_not. This function negates the predicate and calls __find_if, passing it the iterator category as an additional parameter.

__find_if has two overloads: One for input iterators, which is similar to the implementation you showed above. The other is for random access iterators. This overload can calculate the length of the range, which allows it to unroll the loop and perform four predicate calls in each iteration. This is the reason it can work faster on random-access containers such as std::vector.