Akka | Examples and explanations of how Akka toolkit works
kandi X-RAY | Akka Summary
kandi X-RAY | Akka Summary
Author Pablo Perez Garcia. Most common features of Akka ecosystem of lightbend.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Akka
Akka Key Features
Akka Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Akka
QUESTION
Using below code I'm attempting to use an actor as a source and send messages of type Double to be processed via a sliding window.
The sliding windows is defined as sliding(2, 2)
to calculate each sequence of twp values sent.
Sending the message:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 11:39The short answer is that your source
is a recipe of sorts for materializing a Source
and each materialization ends up being a different source.
In your code, source.to(Sink.foreach(System.out::println)).run(system)
is one stream with the materialized actorRef
being only connected to this stream, and
QUESTION
I have one route:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 07:20You can type your route to receive a JsObject
(from SprayJson):
QUESTION
Given the following appliction.conf :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 11:50If you're going to assign different roles to different nodes, those nodes cannot use the same configuration. The easiest way to accomplish this is through n1 having "testRole1"
in its akka.cluster.roles
list and n2 having "testRole2"
in its akka.cluster.roles
list.
Everything in akka.cluster
config is only configuring that node for participation in the cluster (it's configuring the cluster component on that node). A few of the settings have to be the same across the nodes of a cluster (e.g. the SBR settings), but a setting on n1 doesn't affect a setting on n2.
QUESTION
I'm updating an Akka cluster where a particular actor should start on a node within the cluster depending on a configuration value. Initially, I considered using a custom Akka cluster role and have did some research, reading https://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/cluster-usage.html
offers this code :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 00:28In Akka Classic, you would have something like
QUESTION
I'm trying to implement something similar to Akka Streams statefulMapConcat... Basically I have a Flux of scores something like this:
Score(LocalDate date, Integer score)
I want to take these in and emit one aggregate per day:
ScoreAggregate(LocalDate date, Integer scoreCount, Integer totalScore)
So I've got an aggregator that keeps some internal state that I set up before processing, and I want to flatmap over that aggregator which returns a Mono. The aggregator will only emit a Mono with a value if the date changes so you only get one per day.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 07:13Echoing the comment as an answer just so this doesn't show as unanswered:
So my question is... how do I emit a final element when the scoreFlux completes?
You can simply use concatWith()
to concatenate the publisher you want after your original flux completes. If you only want that to be evaluated when the original publisher completes, make sure you wrap it up in Mono.defer()
, which will prevent the pre-emptive execution.
QUESTION
In the Akka tutorials i sometimes see
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 13:48The function (ActorContext[String] => Behavior[String]
) passed to Behaviors.setup
is executed when the actor is spawned, regardless of whether there's a message to process.
The function ((ActorContext[String], String) => Behavior[String]
) passed to Behaviors.receive
is not executed until there's a message to process.
Note that if you had
QUESTION
I have a flow where I consume the paths to the files in small batches from Kafka pah topics, read the files themselves(big JSON arrays) and write them back to Kafka data topics.
It looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-29 at 21:01I'm struck by
...I can't take the entire file content, frame it into separate objects, store them all to Kafka and commit only after that
Since it seems (and you can comment if I'm getting this wrong) that the offset commit is effectively an acknowledgement that you've fully processed a file, there's no way around not committing the offset until after all the objects in the file in the message at that offset have been produced to Kafka.
The downside of Source.via(Flow.flatMapConcat.via(...)).map.via(...)
is that it's a single stream and everything between the first and second via
s, inclusive takes a while.
If you're OK with interleaving objects from files in the output topic and are OK with an unavoidable chance of an object from a given file being produced twice to the output topic (both of these may or may not impose meaningful constraints/difficulties on the implementation of downstream consumers of that topic), you can parallelize the processing of a file. The mapAsync
stream stage is especially useful for this:
QUESTION
Below is code I use to calculate the average of a stream of data within a List of objects:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-29 at 12:28In general, stages in Akka Streams do not share state: they only pass elements of the stream between themselves. Thus the only general way to pass state between stages of a stream is to embed the state into the elements being passed.
In some cases, one could use SourceWithContext
/FlowWithContext
:
Essentially, a
FlowWithContext
is just aFlow
that contains tuples of element and context, but the advantage is in the operators: most operators onFlowWithContext
will work on the element rather than on the tuple, allowing you to focus on your application logic rather without worrying about the context.
In this particular case, since groupBy
is doing something similar to reordering elements, FlowWithContext
doesn't support groupBy
, so you'll have to embed the IDs into the stream elements...
(...Unless you want to dive into the deep end of a custom graph stage, which will likely dwarf the complexity of embedding the IDs into the stream elements.)
QUESTION
I have a play controller:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 23:59What is happening is basically:
- the
Future
result ofcreateSchool(...)
is bound tocreateSchool
workedVal
is initialized tofalse
- a callback is attached to
createSchool
workedVal
is checked andfalse
Ok
with the error message is returned- The
createSchool
Future
completes - The callback is executed, possibly setting
workedVal
You'll have to make it an async Action
, which means every path has to result in a Future
So something like this should work
QUESTION
Im trying to use this scala redis library etaty which needs an implicit akka.actor.ActorSystem
when creating it's RedisClient object. I used the context.system.classicSystem
in the Behaviors.setup method to provide the needed implicit.
Here is my code
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 14:19This is because the redis client wants to create a top level actor under /user which is not possible with a typed actor system because there the /user actor is yours and the only one who is allowed to spawn children of that actor is itself.
The etaty library should be updated to not require doing that (for example return an actor for you to start, or use systemActorOf
to start its own internal actors). You can however work around this by using a classic actor system in your app, and adapting to the typed APIs instead.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Akka
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page