wartremover | Flexible Scala code linting tool | Code Analyzer library
kandi X-RAY | wartremover Summary
kandi X-RAY | wartremover Summary
WartRemover is a flexible Scala code linting tool.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of wartremover
wartremover Key Features
wartremover Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on wartremover
QUESTION
Here is a simplified version of my code.
How can I avoid to call asInstanceOf
(because it is a smell for a poorly design solution) ?
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-04 at 20:18Try a type class
QUESTION
By design, we know for sure that we have an instance of HourlyDateFormat
How to avoid calling asInstanceOf in this case (i.e how to help the compiler to infer the type) ?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-03 at 20:55Try to add one more implicit parameter
QUESTION
I'm setting up a new multi-module project (sbt/scala/play/IntejjiJ) and I would like to have two things:
- A multi-module project with one build.sbt file with this layout
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-06 at 08:58Consider changing the build structure such that api
is moved to become the root project like so:
QUESTION
I wanted to use scala-async. I also use Wartremover with [Return] enabled. (http://www.wartremover.org/doc/warts.html#return).
Then I added some code to test it:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-May-24 at 07:27Seems that the async
macro generates return
statement under the hood.
You can workaround it by adding @SuppressWarnings(Array("org.wartremover.warts.Return"))
above the async
block.
QUESTION
WartRemover's NonUnitStatements
requires that statements that aren't returning unit must have an assignment. OK, but sometimes we have to use annoying Java APIs that both mutate and return a value, and we don't actually hardly ever care about the returned value.
So I end up trying this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-22 at 01:10My general thoughts about linting tools is that you should not jump through hoops to satisfy them.
The point is to make your code better, both with fewer bugs and stylistically. But just assigning to var _ =
does not achieve this. I would first be sure I really really don't care about the return value, not even asserting that it is what I expect it to be. If I don't, I would just add a @SuppressWarnings(Array("org.wartremover.warts.NonUnitStatements"))
and maybe a comment about why and be done with it.
Scala is somewhat unique in that it's a somewhat opinionated language that also tries to integrate with another not-so-opinionated language. This leads to pain points. There are different philosophies to dealing with this, but I tend to not sweat it, and just be aware of and try to isolate the boundaries.
QUESTION
I'm writing a Scala macro and am traversing the tree to find non-private fields in classes.
Consider this code that the macro looks at:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Feb-11 at 13:47A val
definition in Scala expands to a private[this]
field with an additional getter. Other than the ValDef
you're seeing there should be an additional DefDef
method definition with the same name which is the getter on the field.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install wartremover
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page