bf | Brainfuck interpreters written in pure AWK sh rc | Interpreter library

I'm doing a linux online course but im stuck with a question, you can find the question below.

You will get three files called a.bf, b.bf and c.bf. Merge the contents of these three files and write it to a new file called abc.bf. Respect the order: abc.bf must contain the contents of a.bf first, followed by those of b.bf, followed by those of c.bf.

Example Suppose the given files have the following contents:

a.bf contains +++.

b.bf contains [][][][].

c.bf contains <><><>.

The file abc.bf should then have

Up until Linux 5.8 CAP_SYSADMIN was required to load any but the most basic BPF program. The recently introduced CAP_BPF is a welcome addition as it allows to run software leveraging BPF with less privileges.

Certain types of BPF programs can access packet data. The pre-4.7 way of doing it is via bpf_skb_load_bytes() helper. As the verifier got smarter, it became possible to perform "direct packet access", i.e. to access packet bytes by following pointers in the context structure. E.g:

I have a few lists

It seems I need some help with resizing the BMP image when the zoom factor is less than 1. You can see the most crucial part of my code below. The variable f in the code is the zoom factor. It seems logical to me but it works improperly. - this is the image I need to resize (to make it even smaller). - and this is the result picture which doesn't look properly. I think I failed in uploading that here, but it looks like a small green square without any white center at all.

Moreover, I tried to resize one more image - this beautiful smiley: And the result was rather unexpected:

This makes me think that there's a problem with the for-cycles, though it seems completely logical to me.

And this is how the BMP is organized.

I am looking for finding a method to find the association between words in the table (or list). In each cell of the table, I have several words separated by ";".

lets say I have a table as below; some words are 'af' or 'aa' belong to one cell.

I have inherited a simulation program to extend with new features. The original was written as an Applet using the AWT library for graphics. Before adding the new features I want to adapt the program to the desktop and use JavaFX instead of AWT.

The simulation paints hundreds or thousands of objects dozens of times per second, then erases them and repaints them at new locations, effectively animating them. I am using a Canvas object for that part of the UI. Erasing is done by repainting the object with the background color. What I am seeing though is that erasing objects is incomplete. A kind of "halo" gets left behind though.

The following program illustrates the problem. Clicking the "Draw" button causes it to draw a few hundred circles on the Canvas using the foreground color. After drawing, clicking the button again will erase the circles by re-drawing them in the background color. Multiple cycles of draw/erase will build up a visible background of "ghost" images.

I am trying to build a plugin for a Minecraft Spigot server that ultimately I would like to be able to communicate over serial with things connected to my PC (server is running locally on the PC as well).

I have been able to build and run the plugin and manipulate player/blocks in the game so I know the build process for my base plugin is working. My trouble started when I began trying to include an extra dependency: jSerialComm

I added the dependency entry in my pom.xml file:

With Python, I wanted to format a string of hex characters:

• spaces between each byte (easy enough): 2f2f -> 2f 2f
• line breaks at a specified max byte width (not hard): 2f 2f 2f 2f 2f 2f 2f 2f\n
• address ranges for each line (doable): 0x7f8-0x808: 2f 2f 2f 2f 2f 2f 2f 2f\n
• replace large ranges of sequential 00 bytes with: ... trimmed 35 x 00 bytes [0x7 - 0x2a] ... ... it was at this point that I knew I was doing some bad coding. The function got bloated and hard to follow. Too many features piled up in a non-intuitive way.

Example output:

First of all, this question can be a duplicate but the question doesnt have enough information to solve the problem.

I have two windows in my native Win32 application. The first is a layered window with WS_EX_NOACTIVATE extended style and the second is a normal window. I want the layered one to be non-activatable. The problem is that, when I have two window in the same application, the layered one which must be non-activatable, gets activated when switching between them. But there is no problem when switching between two external windows, one being not belong to my application. How can I solve this problem? Or Can I solve that? Is there anything I missed? The following is a minimal reproducable example (didn't include any error checking for minimality.) Thank you for taking time.