Dockerfiles | 50+ DockerHub public images for Docker & Kubernetes - DevOps, CI/CD, GitHub Actions, CircleCI, Jenki

 by   HariSekhon Shell Version: Current License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | Dockerfiles Summary

kandi X-RAY | Dockerfiles Summary

Dockerfiles is a Shell library typically used in Big Data, Docker, Kafka, Spark, Hadoop applications. Dockerfiles has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub, GitLab.

50+ DockerHub public images for Docker & Kubernetes - DevOps, CI/CD, GitHub Actions, CircleCI, Jenkins, TeamCity, Alpine, CentOS, Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu, Hadoop, Kafka, ZooKeeper, HBase, Cassandra, Solr, SolrCloud, Presto, Apache Drill, Nifi, Spark, Consul, Riak
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              Dockerfiles has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 1147 star(s) with 443 fork(s). There are 49 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 13 open issues and 33 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 87 days. There are 2 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of Dockerfiles is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              Dockerfiles has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              Dockerfiles has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              Dockerfiles is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              Dockerfiles releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Dockerfiles
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            Dockerfiles Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for Dockerfiles.

            Dockerfiles Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for Dockerfiles.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Dockerfile: Bash export statement not working
            Asked 2021-Jun-01 at 15:51

            I use dockerfiles to create a container. I know docker, but my bash understanding is very very limited. I know this question is probably a duplicate, but I don't understand what to search for.

            Issue The step RUN export A_NUM=$(echo ${A_VERSION} | head -c 3) does not work. Even though in bash it perfectly works. I tried:

            1. setting ENV A_VERSION=$A_VERSION
            2. replicating my issue in bash (by going into the built container)

            Any export statement in the dockerfile seems to be futile - can anybody explain this?

            Setting

            I have app_A and app_B. When I configure app_B I need to take the chosen version of app_A into account. A simplified dockerfile looks like this:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 15:51

            Each RUN is a separate bash process, with its own environment variables. You must run all your bash commands in a single RUN:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67792050

            QUESTION

            support of Dockerization in new version of SAP Hybris
            Asked 2021-Jun-01 at 08:30

            I'm trying to build a job in Jenkins which will responsible for launching SAP Hybris in docker environment,

            for the 1808.5 version, I can find a recipe for docker as b2c_acc_dockerized where i can generate dockerfiles to build images of SAP Hybris, but for new version like 1905 and new version there is no recipe for docker,

            did they not support docker recipe anymore ? Please help

            what do you propose for me to do the job

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 08:30

            Docker is still supported after 1811. It's all described on the SAP Help

            You can either create your own recipe. Or make use of the ant command createPlatformImageStructure

            Recipe

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67776635

            QUESTION

            docker-compose up is stuck on attaching to
            Asked 2021-May-28 at 13:48

            I have written several python scripts that will backtest trading strategies. I am attempting to deploy these through docker compose.

            The feeder container copies test files to a working directory where the backtester containers will pick them up and process them. The processed test files are then sent to a "completed work" folder. Some CSV files that the backtester outputs are then written to an NFS share on another computer. I should mention that this is all running on Ubuntu 20.04.

            As far as I can tell everything should be working, but for some reason the "docker-compose up" command hangs up on "Attaching to". There should be further output with print statements (I've unbuffered the Dockerfiles so those should show up). I've also left it running for a while to see if anything was getting processed and it looks like the containers never started up. I've looked at all the other threads dealing with this and have not found a solution that has worked to resolve this.

            Any insight is very very appreciated. Thanks.

            Here is the docker-compose file:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-28 at 13:48

            It's been three weeks with no responses, but I just wanted to update with what I've found. In all cases where I've left "docker-compose up" running it eventually started.

            At times it took 30 minutes, but it started every time.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67395047

            QUESTION

            Is windows server required to build server images?
            Asked 2021-May-25 at 03:53

            Very simples .Net5.0 Dockerfiles, builds and runs fine on Windows 10 20H2. But when I push the image to Azure Container, it errors with New-AzContainerGroup: Unsupported windows image version. Which sounds like I pushed Windows 10 and not server. Do I need to build this image on a server OS?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-25 at 03:53

            Found the answer, just need to use the right tagged build that was built on the OS I need. In the dockerfile below, it is the tag 5.0-windowsservercore-ltsc2019. That was built with server core ltsc2019. Works in Container Service now.

            https://hub.docker.com/_/microsoft-dotnet-sdk

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67681162

            QUESTION

            Docker Image from Build Directory vs Source directory
            Asked 2021-May-24 at 21:40

            Most of the DockerFiles seem to be generating the image from the source code directory. Is there a reason why this is done?

            For example, If I run the build commands in a windows machine and copy the dist folder into a linux machine and run as per Option 2, isn't it supposed to work?

            Option 1 - Docker file (from source directory)

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-24 at 21:40

            Your first form uses a Docker multi-stage build. This has the specific advantage of not depending on any particular tools being installed on the host system. I'd consider this path:

            • If you have a clustered CI system, it can be much easier to run the build in a container than to try to get the required tools manually installed on every worker system.
            • If you're working in a compiled language (C, Go, Rust, ...), you can consistently use Linux containers even if developers use a different host OS.
            • If you need to do extra work to set up the build system, like installing extra C development packages.
            • If you need a really exact version of the language runtime for whatever reason.

            The second path depends on having the toolchain available outside the container environment. That's not necessarily a problem; most front-end developers will probably have Node installed anyways. I'd consider this path:

            • If the result of the build is extremely portable across environments (compiled HTML and Javascript; Java .jar files; interpreted text-format Python or Ruby scripting code).
            • If there aren't big differences in different versions of the language runtime itself to produce the build. (Does your Webpack build do anything different on Node 8, 10, 12, or 14?)
            • If the build system is something that's easy to install, or preinstalled in most host environments. (Most Linux and MacOS systems have Python, for example.)
            • If a host build system can do incremental builds or otherwise run much faster than a clean-slate container build.

            For what you show, with a simple front-end application that's compiled to static files, your second form is just fine. If you look at SO Java questions they almost universally COPY a prebuilt .jar file into an image, without including a build chain.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67677686

            QUESTION

            Building R Docker Container with Rocker Scripts on Ubuntu 18.04
            Asked 2021-May-14 at 01:33

            I'm having problems with a package that may be solved by rolling back to bionic. With the new modular rocker system it seems like the following would work based on their build on 18.04. When I build this with a hello world shiny app I just get shiny_server exited with code 0.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-14 at 01:33

            I dont know why but separating the install scripts into separate layers makes an image that works.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67495304

            QUESTION

            How can I solve COPY failed: file not found in build context or excluded in Azure Pipeline?
            Asked 2021-May-11 at 12:48

            I got stuck very interesting issue with azure pipeline. The issue is "Forbidden path outside the build context".If you have an add line in the Dockerfile which points to another directory, the build of the image fails with the message "Forbidden path".How can I solve this?

            I was recently attempting to Dockerize a C# project, so I added a docker folder to the project and created a simple Dockerfile to get started like below:

            Error:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-04 at 01:44

            You can try to add buildContext parameter in the Docker task.

            buildContext: Path to the build context

            Here is a case you can refer to.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67296022

            QUESTION

            Change default port for Vue.js app on Docker
            Asked 2021-May-09 at 12:08

            I'm trying to change de default port for a Vue.js app on docker.

            I used both examples in this official documentation: https://vuejs.org/v2/cookbook/dockerize-vuejs-app.html

            Dockerfile with http-server:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-09 at 12:08

            QUESTION

            When to replace localhost with service name in docker?
            Asked 2021-May-08 at 20:53

            I have reactjs app and express app dockerized.
            This is my docker-compose.yml file:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-08 at 20:53

            When you go to your browser and type http://localhost:3000 in, the browser makes a call to the client container, does an HTTP GET to retrieve the Javascript code, and the browser actually runs the code. This is a critical difference: any fetch calls or similar from your React application are running in the end user's browser, not inside Docker.

            If a call is coming from the browser; it is part of your front-end application; or it is otherwise coming from outside Docker, then you need to use the host system's DNS name and the first published ports: number. If the browser and the containers are both running on the same system you can use localhost; if Docker is running in a VM (perhaps on the older Docker Toolbox setup) you need the VM's IP address.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67451389

            QUESTION

            'exec user process caused: exec format error' in AWS Fargate Service
            Asked 2021-May-07 at 12:05

            I am totally new to AWS but I've been running my dockerized application locally for months now with no issues. Now that I am trying to deploy this app via AWS ECS/Fargate, my containers are stopped repeatedly with this linux error: standard_init_linux.go:219: exec user process caused: exec format error. This error seems to suggest that the architecture in Fargate does not recognize one of the Linux commands I'm running but I can't find a good answer anywhere for how to find the architecture that's running or how to track down the specific command that's causing the issue.

            These are my Dockerfiles for the frontend and backend. The project is built in the MERN stack and is split into the frontend (React) and the backend (MongoDB/Express)

            Frontend:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-02 at 23:38

            I think you've identified your problem.

            You're building your images on Apple's M1 chip, which is an ARM architecture. Fargate is probably running on the more common Intel x86-64 architecture. Images you build locally on your Mac aren't going to be able to run there.

            The easiest solution is probably to have your images build automatically in Docker Hub (or use a Github Action to build them in Github).

            I don't have all the details about how you're building and deploying your images, so it's possible I'm missing some details.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67361936

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install Dockerfiles

            All images come pre-built on [DockerHub](https://hub.docker.com/u/harisekhon/) but if you want to compile from source for any reason such as developing improvements, I’ve made this easy to do:.

            Support

            Please raise tickets for issues and improvements at https://github.com/harisekhon/dockerfiles/issues.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/HariSekhon/Dockerfiles.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone HariSekhon/Dockerfiles

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:HariSekhon/Dockerfiles.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link