letsencrypt-nginx-proxy | reverse proxy with automated vHost and SSL-cert generation | TLS library

by eforce21 Shell Version: 1.2.0 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(10)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | letsencrypt-nginx-proxy Summary

letsencrypt-nginx-proxy is a Shell library typically used in Security, TLS, Nginx, Docker applications. letsencrypt-nginx-proxy has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

reverse proxy with automated vHost and SSL-cert generation

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

letsencrypt-nginx-proxy has a low active ecosystem.

It has 39 star(s) with 13 fork(s). There are 11 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 4 open issues and 7 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 5 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of letsencrypt-nginx-proxy is 1.2.0

Quality

letsencrypt-nginx-proxy has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

letsencrypt-nginx-proxy has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

letsencrypt-nginx-proxy code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

letsencrypt-nginx-proxy is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

letsencrypt-nginx-proxy releases are available to install and integrate.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of letsencrypt-nginx-proxy

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

letsencrypt-nginx-proxy Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for letsencrypt-nginx-proxy.

letsencrypt-nginx-proxy Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for letsencrypt-nginx-proxy.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on letsencrypt-nginx-proxy

Reverse proxy to another machine

Docker rootless Error: you need to share your Docker host socket with a volume at /var/run/docker.sock

docker serve content over https without domain (only with public IP Address)

Laravel connection to mysql container error docker

Running multiple multi-container applications in a single docker-compose file

docker-compose up gives errors: Are you trying to mount a directory onto a file?

Commiting new changes to Gunicorn + Nginx + Django dockerized application in server

No live upstream while connecting to upstream jwilder/ngnix-proxy

gitea in docker behind jwilder/nginx-proxy and jrcs/letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion

Is it possible to share ports between NGINX and Docker Container?

QUESTION

Reverse proxy to another machine

Asked 2021-Jul-13 at 21:01

Explanation of what I am trying to do:

I have 2 servers on the ip 192.168.1.10 (docker reverse proxy) and 192.168.1.20 (other services). I want 10 to redirect requests to 20 (many of these requests are with SSL).

Example:

user request answer back return example_internal.host.com → 192.168.1.10 → https://example_internal.host.com example_external.host.com → 192.168.1.20 → https://example_external.host.com

docker-compose.yaml:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jul-04 at 22:56

the nginx config there is reverse proxying to itself on port 80. If you want to reverse proxy to one of the other containers change lacalhost to whatever service name you gave the container. eg http://nginx_external:80

If that does not work, try ammending your config to being something along the lines of:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68145834

QUESTION

Docker rootless Error: you need to share your Docker host socket with a volume at /var/run/docker.sock

Asked 2021-Jul-13 at 03:19

I am trying to go rootless with Docker.

I have followed all the steps presented in the official documentation. I also allowed the use of the unprivileged ports, to include the 443.

To test if everything works the way I need it, I installed the "nginx-proxy-automation".

Everything got installed flawlessly. However, the jrcs/letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion:2.1 container

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jul-13 at 03:14

This is a jrcs/letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion specific bug, if you look in the docker-compose.yml you will see this.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68331153

QUESTION

docker serve content over https without domain (only with public IP Address)

Asked 2021-Jun-22 at 08:05

I have two different servers. At Server 1 I have a domain and a IP Address and at Server 2 I have only a public IP Address. At Server 1 I am hosting a webpage and at Server 2 I am hosting the webservice. When I want to connect from Server 1 to Server 2 I get the following error:

This request has been blocked; the content must be served over HTTPS

I dont get it done to serve the content from the webservice over HTTPS. First I tried it with letsencrypt and nginx reverse proxy but there I get the error that an IP Address cant be verified with SSL. Then I tried it without letsencrypt but then I get the content only over http. How can I serve my content with https and docker when I have only a public IP address without a domain? This is my docker-compose file:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-22 at 08:05

I could think of two possible solutions:

1. Add a DNS entry for your domain that points to your backend

If your domain is something like example.com, you could use the subdomain api.example.com for your backend.

Read more on how to use subdomains here: How to add subdomain entry

2. Add both your servers in a Docker Swarm configuration

If you add both servers to your swarm, you can run the communication over an internal network, which can be encrypted.

You can read more about it in the official Docker Docs: https://docs.docker.com/network/overlay/

I can't judge from your question, if this will fit for you, though.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68079531

QUESTION

Laravel connection to mysql container error docker

Asked 2021-Apr-13 at 16:15

I am out of option . going through many solutions nothing worked . It has been asked by many people but nothing earlier solutions worked for me .

.env

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Apr-13 at 16:15

It all looks good. . Any chance your config was cached ?

php artisan config:clear

php artisan cache:clear

If the above not works.

Try deleting cache if any something you can find cache>config.php

Try these to test you Laravel connection in config>web.php

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67062074

QUESTION

Running multiple multi-container applications in a single docker-compose file

Asked 2021-Jan-02 at 09:25

I want to run multiple containerized web apps behind a containerized reverse proxy. I am using nginx-proxy as a reverse proxy and letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion for creation, renewal, and use of Let's Encrypt certificates.

Each of the web apps has a set of dependencies (containers themself) and could be managed by one docker-compose file. However, currently, reverse proxy service, certificate service, and all web apps are in the same compose file. I just run docker-compose up -d and all my web apps are running.

As you see I am using docker-compose to set up my whole server infrastructure by just running one command. However, it feels a bit like I am misusing or even abusing docker-compose since I am bundling independent applications together.

Is it ok to bundle multiple containers, which do not belong together, in one docker-compose for convenience, or is there a better way to set up everything with one command?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jan-02 at 09:25

I think that it's totally fine and this is the purpose of docker-compose.

If you do wish kind of separation you can always split a group of containers into a separate docker-compose and run whatever you need in a single command.

For example, if you split into to groups, and name the first file as docker-comopose-app-a.yaml and docker-compose-app-b.yaml you can run them together with:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65537588

QUESTION

docker-compose up gives errors: Are you trying to mount a directory onto a file?

Asked 2020-Nov-04 at 11:42

I'm trying to install nextcloud with docker on windows (Docker version: 19.03.13) and Im very new to docker usage.

Im starting windows powershell with adminrights and using docker-compose up -d

my compose yaml looks like this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Nov-04 at 11:42

Since you are on a Windows host, the mount paths like /etc/localtime won’t work because they don’t exist on your system. The configuration you are using is for a Linux-based host.

Although, it’s recommended, you can remove those mounts from your services. But, keep in mind that you need to keep the docker socket mount, and you will need to adjust it for a Windows host (since the one you have is also for a Linux host). You can try some solution from here.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64677682

QUESTION

Commiting new changes to Gunicorn + Nginx + Django dockerized application in server

Asked 2020-Oct-09 at 11:09

Docker novice here.

I have committed new changes inside the application. These changes where copied from my local to host machine, and then to docker container. So I created a new image sudo docker commit old_container_id new_image_name(djangotango-on-docker_web)

Then I spin the docker container by using new image created.

sudo docker run --name djangotango-web -d --expose 8000 djangotango-on-docker_web gunicorn djangotango.wsgi:application --bind 0.0.0.0:8000

Here djangotango-on-docker_web is my new image created.

But my application gives 502 error after this. My new container is not synced properly.

dockerfile

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Oct-09 at 11:09

The correct approach here is to use only docker-compose commands, and to go ahead and rebuild your image:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64277572

QUESTION

No live upstream while connecting to upstream jwilder/ngnix-proxy

Asked 2020-Oct-08 at 17:57

The documentation is not clear to me, as well as this is my first deployment I keep getting error as 502 because of no live upstream.

This is the code.

docker.staging.yml

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Oct-08 at 17:57

I found out the bug causing upstream error.

Since I was exposing port 8000 for web, my nginx was unable to talk to web container, since they didn't share the same network.

So, it's better to remove the network from compose, so that they can talk to each other, which is the default behaviour of container.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64258313

QUESTION

gitea in docker behind jwilder/nginx-proxy and jrcs/letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion

Asked 2020-Sep-30 at 13:05

I am stuck deploying docker image gitea/gitea:1 behind a reverse proxy jwilder/nginx-proxy with jrcs/letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion for automatic certificate updates. gitea is running and I can connect by the http adress with port 3000. The proxy is running also, as I have multiple apps and services e.g. sonarqube working well.

This is my docker-compose.yml:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Sep-30 at 13:05

I believe all you are missing is your VIRTUAL_PORT setting in your gitea container's environment. This tells the reverse proxy container which port to connect with when routing incoming requests from your VIRTUAL_HOST domain, effectively adding along the lines of ":3000" to your upstream server in the nginx conf. This is also the case when your containers are all on the same host. By default, the reverse proxy container only listens on port 80 on that service, but since gitea docker container uses another default port of 3000, you need to tell that to the reverse proxy container essentially. See below using snippet from your compose file.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63869617

QUESTION

Is it possible to share ports between NGINX and Docker Container?

Asked 2020-Sep-25 at 12:52

I have Ubuntu 18:04/NGINX VPS where I have a bunch of Laravel project blocks, all use ssl (certbot).

I wanted to deploy Nextcloud via Docker Compose on the same VPS:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Sep-25 at 12:52

2 services are unable to listen to the same port as you have found. Your laravel applications are already listening on ports 80/443, so when start your nextcloud containers, it won't be able to bind to those ports.

You'll have to have your jwilder/nginx-proxy:alpine act as a proxy to both the nextcloud container and the laravel servers. This can be done via your nginx configurations and mount it to your container (which you seem to be using the ./proxy/ directory):

https://docs.nginx.com/nginx/admin-guide/web-server/reverse-proxy/

Although, if your VPS is able to have 2 IP addresses, then you are able to bind the laravel applications to one interface and your nextcloud proxy to the other which will also solve your problem. The first method is better practice as would allow you to scale your server better without having to add another IP address per-application.

https://docs.docker.com/config/containers/container-networking/

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64032046

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install letsencrypt-nginx-proxy

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: