git-feature | My git workflow | Command Line Interface library

by jgeewax Shell Version: Current License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | git-feature Summary

git-feature is a Shell library typically used in Utilities, Command Line Interface applications. git-feature has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

With all of my projects, I end up following a workflow that looks something like. In git-speak, this roughly translates to. This is fine, but it was starting to see like a lot more typing for something that really a shell script could do. I looked into git-flow and a few other things and decided to do something different. All of the things I do are just shell commands... there's nothing special except the order in which it's done. So I just made a few very handy git aliases that most of the typing for me.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

git-feature has a low active ecosystem.

It has 43 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 2 open issues and 0 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of git-feature is current.

Quality

git-feature has no bugs reported.

Security

git-feature has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

git-feature does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

git-feature releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of git-feature

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

git-feature Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for git-feature.

git-feature Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for git-feature.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on git-feature

Getting git-commit-ids on the commandline

Github feature branch made branches automatically and merged it again

QUESTION

Getting git-commit-ids on the commandline

Asked 2020-Sep-24 at 12:25

When running git commit --fixup=beefca7e or when referencing a previous commit in a commit message, I have to use the mouse in a clumsy workflow. I use bash:

Open a new terminal tab/window/pane.
git log --oneline --graph.¹
Scan through the list to find the relevant commit sha.
Grab the mouse, select the sha, copy it to the clipboard.²
Move back the the pane where I was working and paste it there.

This works. But I suspect this can be done much easier.

Are there commandline tools, scripts or git-addons out there that allow me to quickly filter through the commits and copy the sha of a selected entry? Is my workflow wrong(or naive), and did I miss an important git-feature somewhere?

Bonus for being able to use this in vim too, since that is my editor to edit commit messages. Bonus for copying the short sha instead of the full one.

¹ I have a somewhat more complex alias for this named git lg.
² xclip/gnome/clipboard manager is configured to auto-copy-on-select. Otherwise ctrl-c/cmd-c or so. Pasting is middle-mouse-button. Saves a few commands but still suboptimal. I'd rather not use the mouse at all and omit most steps.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Sep-24 at 10:08

gitk/gitg have "shortcuts" geared for linux : they auto select the sha1 of the selected commit, which places it in the X clipboard, you can the paste the sha with "middle click" without any other action.

On windows, if the sha1 is auto selected, you could just ctrl+C straight away.

From the command line : you could use one of these tools, combined with an adequate command, to copy a sha1 to the clipboard, but depending on your needs, the "adequate command" may become involved :

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64042753

QUESTION

Github feature branch made branches automatically and merged it again

Asked 2020-Mar-30 at 15:12

If you see the picture below, the blue branch is a feature branch Dev A and Dev B are working on. No one has branched off of the feature branch. But when Dev B removed some files, committed and pushed the changes to repo, it was created as a branch of the feature branch in git client graphical view (sourcetree). When Dev B checks git status, it still says the working branch is the same feature branch.

Dev A created some service class, committed and pushed it. It shows it still is in the feature branch. Why does this exactly happen, anyone can help explain please? Is it just graphical? Or either Dev A or Dev B didn't pull a change in between. Additionaly, on next git push by Dev B, the red new branch merged back to the feature branch.

Upon request, here is the git log of Dev B:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Mar-30 at 15:12

What happened is Dev A tried to push, but it got rejected, so (s)he pulled and then pushed successfully.

A pull is equivalent to a fetch and a merge. For example, if you are on feature_branch:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60908854

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install git-feature

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

Since I rebase all my commits (and git finish will try to get you to rebase as well), I usually run git add -A && git commit -m "Checkpoint" to stash my commits on my current feature branch. I found myself doing that so often that I just made it an alias... This makes it relatively easy to save where you were and move onto another task. This might be another personal preference, but I like to keep a feature branch focused on the feature. That is, if I need to update a library that other people might need or use, I like to put that in another feature and the pull those changes over from the parent. This would look like... The rebase basically brings your branch up to speed relative to master and you (and other people on your team) can continue working on your feature with the changes to library being separate from your feature work.

Find more information at: