spm-lcov-action | Swift Package Manager Code Coverage Report | Code Coverage Tools library

by maxep Shell Version: 0.3.1 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets(2)Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | spm-lcov-action Summary

spm-lcov-action is a Shell library typically used in Code Quality, Code Coverage Tools applications. spm-lcov-action has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

The action will report a test coverage summary in your job logs:.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

spm-lcov-action has a low active ecosystem.

It has 8 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 0 open issues and 2 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 37 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of spm-lcov-action is 0.3.1

Quality

spm-lcov-action has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

spm-lcov-action has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

spm-lcov-action code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

spm-lcov-action is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

spm-lcov-action releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of spm-lcov-action

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

spm-lcov-action Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for spm-lcov-action.

spm-lcov-action Examples and Code Snippets

SPM lcov action,Summary Report

Shell

Lines of Code : 7

License : Permissive (MIT)

Copy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
URLConvertible.swift               24                 6    75.

SPM lcov action,Example usage

Shell

Lines of Code : 7

License : Permissive (MIT)

Copy

- name: Run tests
      run: swift test --enable-code-coverage

- name: Test coverage
  uses: maxep/spm-lcov-action@0.3.0
  with:
      output-file: ./coverage/lcov.info

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Code Coverage Tools

Why is CodeCoverage.exe producing near empty .coverage Files?

GitLab Docker Runner to reuse installed software layers

Convert the last generated .Coverage into coveragexml for SonarQubee in TFS 2017

Making assertions from non-test-case classes

QUESTION

Why is CodeCoverage.exe producing near empty .coverage Files?

Asked 2022-Mar-25 at 19:29

In our Jenkins pipeline, we use SonarQube to report on our code coverage. After running all of our unit/integration tests to produce the .coverage file, we need to analyze this file to create the ".coverage.coveragexml" which is ultimately what is used by SonarQube to interpret the code coverage. We do this by using the CodeCoverage.exe:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Mar-25 at 19:29

It seems the base image we use must have a non-enterprise edition of the Code Coverage tools (which is a requirement). We tested our SonarQube projects commands locally using an enterprise edition of the tools (I have Visual Studio 2022 Enterprise installed on my machine), and the coverage files produced contain the correct data. However, when we used a Visual Studio Professional install, the files are empty just like our Jenkins pipeline.

As stated, this started happening when the base image was updated - in particular it was around November 8th 2021. It seems the base docker image we were using (mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/framework/sdk:4.8-20220210-windowsservercore-ltsc2019) has the latest 2022 tools, but it must not be an enterprise edition - hence the empty files.

We switched our pipeline over to using dotCover instead to perform the analysis, which works as expected and our SonarQube coverage is back to normal.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71587878

QUESTION

GitLab Docker Runner to reuse installed software layers

Asked 2020-Jan-29 at 15:42

A very typical scenario with GitLab CI is to install a few packages you need for your jobs (linters, code coverage tools, deployment-specific helpers and so on) and to then run your actual stages/steps of a building, testing and deploying your software.

The Docker runner is a very neat and clean solution, but it seems very wasteful to always run the steps that install the base software. Normally, Docker is able to cache such layers, but with the way the GitLab Docker runner works, that doesn't happen.

Do we realize that setting up another project to produce pre-configured Docker images would be one solution, but are there any better ones? Basically, what we want to say is: "If the before section hasn't changed, you can reuse the image from last time, no need to reinstall wget or whatever".

Any solution like that out there?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jan-29 at 14:23

You can use the registry of your gitlab project.

eg.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59964671

QUESTION

Convert the last generated .Coverage into coveragexml for SonarQubee in TFS 2017

Asked 2020-Jan-29 at 09:54

I am using .Net Core Test --collect "Code coverage" to generate a coverage file, I need to convert this for sonarqube, the issue is I do not nave the name of the file thats generated as its placed in a folder with a guid name and the file name itself is a GUID all under the TestResults folder

The following script works to convert .coverage files into coveragexml, but its for the whole working directory

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jan-29 at 09:52

So you want to take only the last created code coverage file, you can filter the Get-ChiledItem results to get the last one:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59962345

QUESTION

Making assertions from non-test-case classes

Asked 2020-Jan-16 at 02:47

Background

I have a rails model that contains an ActiveRecord::Enum. I have a view helper that takes a value of this enum, and returns one of several possible responses. Suppose the cases were called enum_cases, for example:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jan-16 at 01:36

enum_cases must be kept up to date when the production logic changes violating the DRY principle. This makes it more likely for there to be a mistake. Furthermore it is test code living in production, another red flag.

We can solve this by refactoring the case into a Hash lookup making it data driven. And also giving it a name describing what it's associated with and what it does, these are "handlers". I've also turned it into a method call making it easier to access and which will bear fruit later.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59761298

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install spm-lcov-action

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: