chag | canonical source of change data
kandi X-RAY | chag Summary
kandi X-RAY | chag Summary
Use your changelog as the canonical source of change data. With pure Bash.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of chag
chag Key Features
chag Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on chag
QUESTION
I have been able to generate the all permutation of length 4 from a string, the problem that I am facing now is that all the permutation have duplicates like {abcd) ,{adbc},{bcda}...which are all same as from Mathematical definition of set.
Is there a short version in java-8 where I can get the pure set?
My code that generated the all permutation:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-21 at 09:44If you want to find the unique words (without considering order of characters, as you mentioned), you can do one additional step after permutation is done.
QUESTION
In the data frame below called MyData
, 7 measurements (Sub1:Sub7
) are taken on each individual. Individuals are identified by unique ID
numbers. Several individuals are grouped into each level of Location
. For each Sub
in each Location
, I want to set a threshold to define outliers, and return a list of those outliers. I could do this by sub-setting each unique level of Location
: (APNG <- MyData%>%filter(Location == "APNG")
, then using the summary()
function to get the 1st and 3rd quartiles for each, create a threshold for each : thresh1 <- Q3+1.5*IQR(APNG$Sub1) + thresh2 <- Q1-1.5*IQR(APNG$Sub1), save the results into a different object, repeat for all Subs
in each unique Location
, and concatenate them all at the end. What is the best alternative to doing it this way?
here is an example of my data:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-03 at 19:09Here's an option that outputs a list with the outliers for each Sub:
QUESTION
I have collected data on 216 individuals. I measured the concentration of the same 7 Substances in each individual, represented by Sub1:Sub7. The concentration of these Substances may be different in individuals from different Locations. I am interested in the level of refinement at which these individuals can be classified into groups based on their concentrations of these substances. I am also interested in seeing how these Substances may be correlated with each other, as the concentration of some may effect the concentration of others. Each Individual in my data set is represented by a unique ID number. Three "nested" grouping variables (Location, State, and Region) can be used to separate these individuals. Multiple Locations are in each State, and multiple States are part of larger Regions. For instance, the individuals in the Locations: APNG, BLEA, and NEAR are all in FL, while the individuals in the Locations: CACT, OYLE, and PIY are all in GA. The states FL and GA are both in Region A. I used this function to conduct an anova:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-03 at 00:46I think the issue with your tests
object is that it holds too much informations to figure out how to plot it.
Here, I focused only on Regions
columns, but you can apply the same workflow to other categorical columns of your dataset.
1) We need to obtain the label (letters) associated to each region for each substance, so recycling your loop
, I did this:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install chag
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page