docker-letsencrypt | Handle your certs behind a proxy | TLS library

by ployst Shell Version: 0.1.0 License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets(3)Community Discussions(7)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | docker-letsencrypt Summary

docker-letsencrypt is a Shell library typically used in Security, TLS, Docker applications. docker-letsencrypt has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Handle your certs behind a proxy

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

docker-letsencrypt has a low active ecosystem.

It has 51 star(s) with 26 fork(s). There are 10 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 2 open issues and 6 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 145 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of docker-letsencrypt is 0.1.0

Quality

docker-letsencrypt has no bugs reported.

Security

docker-letsencrypt has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

docker-letsencrypt does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

docker-letsencrypt releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of docker-letsencrypt

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

docker-letsencrypt Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for docker-letsencrypt.

docker-letsencrypt Examples and Code Snippets

letsencrypt-kubernetes,Useful commands,Generate a new set of certs

Shell

Lines of Code : 1

License : No License

Copy

kubectl exec -it  -- bash -c 'EMAIL=fred@fred.com DOMAINS=example.com foo.example.com ./fetch_certs.sh'

letsencrypt-kubernetes,Useful commands,Save the set of certificates as a secret

Shell

Lines of Code : 1

License : No License

Copy

kubectl exec -it  -- bash -c 'DOMAINS=example.com foo.example.com ./save_certs.sh'

letsencrypt-kubernetes,Useful commands,Refresh the certificates

Shell

Lines of Code : 1

License : No License

Copy

kubectl exec -it  -- bash -c 'EMAIL=fred@fred.com DOMAINS=example.com foo.example.com SECRET_NAME=foo DEPLOYMENTS=bar ./refresh_certs.sh'

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on docker-letsencrypt

Running multiple multi-container applications in a single docker-compose file

docker-compose + letsencrypt + nginx-proxy. Where is nginx.conf?

Empty files in container, using docker-compose with volumes to init image with existing files

Nginx Proxy Upstream Server Docker Compose - 502 Bad Gateway Connection Refused

How to run Gitlab in docker container with nginx-proxy over ssl with letsencrypt securely

Install PHP composer in existing docker image

CA marked some of the authorizations as invalid

QUESTION

Running multiple multi-container applications in a single docker-compose file

Asked 2021-Jan-02 at 09:25

I want to run multiple containerized web apps behind a containerized reverse proxy. I am using nginx-proxy as a reverse proxy and letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion for creation, renewal, and use of Let's Encrypt certificates.

Each of the web apps has a set of dependencies (containers themself) and could be managed by one docker-compose file. However, currently, reverse proxy service, certificate service, and all web apps are in the same compose file. I just run docker-compose up -d and all my web apps are running.

As you see I am using docker-compose to set up my whole server infrastructure by just running one command. However, it feels a bit like I am misusing or even abusing docker-compose since I am bundling independent applications together.

Is it ok to bundle multiple containers, which do not belong together, in one docker-compose for convenience, or is there a better way to set up everything with one command?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jan-02 at 09:25

I think that it's totally fine and this is the purpose of docker-compose.

If you do wish kind of separation you can always split a group of containers into a separate docker-compose and run whatever you need in a single command.

For example, if you split into to groups, and name the first file as docker-comopose-app-a.yaml and docker-compose-app-b.yaml you can run them together with:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65537588

QUESTION

docker-compose + letsencrypt + nginx-proxy. Where is nginx.conf?

Asked 2019-Jul-25 at 23:19

I'm using this library, and it works as expected. I just want to add an attribute client_max_body_size 50M to Nginx, but where to add it in the docker-compose file:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jul-25 at 23:19

You need to create a docker file with that configuration and add build config in the docker-compose file.

First, create a Dockerfile named nginx_proxy.df with the following content.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57211159

QUESTION

Empty files in container, using docker-compose with volumes to init image with existing files

Asked 2019-Jul-09 at 07:17

I am trying to init container with existing configurations files I have. The files that I have are nginx.conf and ssl.conf. The volumes configuration is set like this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jul-09 at 07:17

So I was able to reproduce your issue

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56911385

QUESTION

Nginx Proxy Upstream Server Docker Compose - 502 Bad Gateway Connection Refused

Asked 2019-Jan-06 at 12:50

I am trying to containerize all things related to my web app using Docker Compose, including Nginx & SSL Certificates. To do this I am using the Nginx Proxy image from JWilder and the LetsEncrypt Companion, but am having trouble getting the nginx proxy to work, result ends up being:

Nginx 502 Bad Gateway

[error] 31160#0: *35 connect() failed (111: Connection refused) while connecting to upstream, client: xx.xx.xx.xx, server: domain.com, request: "GET /dev/ HTTP/1.1", upstream: "webapp://127.0.0.1:8080", host: "domain.com"

This only happened when trying to set up the Nginx proxy and SSL certificates so I know it's a configuration issue for either or both of these containers. If anyone can spot where I am going wrong, I would be extremely grateful!

Here are the containers in question:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jan-06 at 12:48

Since nginx and webapp are on two separate containers, nginx can't reach webapp on localhost(127.0.0.1) as you've configured for upstream:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54061155

QUESTION

How to run Gitlab in docker container with nginx-proxy over ssl with letsencrypt securely

Asked 2018-Mar-21 at 11:37

I have been fighting with this configuration for days now and whatever I do I cannot get it to work completely. Can anyone help me please ??

I am using this solution described here: https://github.com/JrCs/docker-letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion which works perfectly for all my other containers but not for gitlab. Using this method only the gitlab login page is fully secured once logged in the green padlock and text Secure goes away and the https tells me; "Your connection to this site is not fully secure". I have checked the logs inside gitlab container, it finds the ssl certificates fine and gives no other errors or indication that something is wrong. Anyone?

file: start.up

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Mar-21 at 11:37

I think you are missing the nginx config in your docker-compose.yml.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46195852

QUESTION

Install PHP composer in existing docker image

Asked 2018-Mar-12 at 12:24

I'm running docker-letsencrypt through a docker-compose.yml file. It comes with PHP. I'm trying to run PHP composer with it. I can install composer while being in the container through bash, but that won't stick when I recreate the container. How do I keep a permanent install of composer in an existing container that doesn't come with compose by default?

My docker-compose.yml looks like this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Mar-12 at 12:24

You're right about your comment about the command option, it will indeed be run every time you launch your container.

One workaround would be to create your own dockerfile, as follow :

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49234785

QUESTION

CA marked some of the authorizations as invalid

Asked 2017-Apr-26 at 21:12

I have followed the directions for the recommended method of separating containers issued here: https://github.com/JrCs/docker-letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion by creating a docker-compose.yml file as follows:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Apr-26 at 21:12

well, for one thing I noticed I had mounted the path to the certs for nginx-letsencrypt twice (one leftover entry from the example). I fixed that but it didn't help

the fix seemed to be to remove the volumes and re-add them. something got weird, perhaps in the order in which I ran the containers, or all the experimentation. so I've moved on but I'm not sure I know what the problem was

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43641812

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install docker-letsencrypt

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: