jit | Deploy binaries in style | Compiler library

Tailwind way will be to write custom plugin for every font-variant property. This example will add support for font-varaint-ligatures. The way you tried font-variant-[variant] will not work because ligatures, east-easian, etc are part of a property, not a value

NOTE: unfortunatelly example bellow DOES NOT support JIT feature as a lack of information about support for adding custom JIT utilities (at least for now)

Good Day,

Please try this. What I changed was:

1. The single quotes '' to double quotes "",

2. I made the input element a textArea to be able to see if the \n\r is doing what it is suppose to do, but the main issue I had was because of the quotes. Not sure why you want to add line breaks into an input element.

3. I tested this code here: playground

4. You can Copy text from a textArea component too, it does not have to be a input text field.

Your problem is likely related to this documented issue with numba.

A first workaround would be to define epoch outside of your jit function:

There are several problems to handle: first, you've commented out the @jit decorator of your first function, stopF_w.

If you uncomment it, you'll resolve your current error. Unfortunately, you will immediately run into several other errors. if your numba version is up to date, you'll see an error pertaining to "reflected lists".

Basically, your inputs b_wi and f_wi are lists of variable length lists, which cannot be converted into uniform numpy arrays. E.g.: if instead of [[1,2,3,4],[6,7,8,9,10,11]], if b_wi was something like [[1,2,3, 4, 6], [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]] (easily convertible to an array of shape (2, 5) then it would work without any problems. To get your variable length lists to work with numba, you need to rely on a Typed List, which is a bit cumbersome.

The PostgreSQL executor produces result tuples (stored in a TupleTableSlot) "on demand". If you need the next result row from an execution plan node, you call its ExecProcNode function, which will return the desired result. This will in turn call ExecProcNode on other, lower plan nodes as needed.

The struct member ExecProcNode is of type ExecProcNodeMtd, which is defined as

I think its the namespace that is the issue:

You probably cannot optimize startup time and performance by changing your application^{1, 2}. And especially for a small application³. And I certainly don't think there are "generic" ways to do it; i.e. optimizations that will work for all cases.

However, there are a couple of JVM features that should improve performance for a short-lived JVM.

Class Data Sharing (CDS) is a feature that allows JIT compiled classes to be cached in the file system (as a CDS archive) and which is then reused by later of runs of your application. This feature has been available since Java 5 (though with limitations in earlier Java releases).

The CDS feature is controlled using the -Xshare JVM option.

• -Xshare:dump generates a CDS archive during the run
• -Xshare:off -Xshare:on and -Xshare:auto control whether an existing CDS archive will be used.

The other way to improve startup times for a HotSpot JVM is (was) to use Ahead Of Time (AOT) compilation. Basically, you compile your application to a native code binary using the jaotc command, and then run the executable it produces rather than the java command. The jaotc command is experimental and was introduced in Java 9.

It appears that jaotc was not included in the Java 16 builds published by Oracle, and is scheduled for removal in Java 17. (See JEP 410: Remove the Experimental AOT and JIT Compiler).

The current recommended way to get AOT compilation for Java is to use the GraalVM AOT Java compiler.

^{1 - You could convert into a client-server application where the server "up" all of the time. However, that has other problems, and doesn't eliminate the startup time issue for the client ... assuming that is coded in Java.
2 - According to @apangin, there are some other application tweaks that may could make you code more JIT friendly, though it will depend on what you code is currently doing.
3 - It is conceivable that the startup time for a large (long running) monolithic application could be improved by refactoring it so that subsystems of the application can be loaded and initialized only when they are needed. However, it doesn't sound like this would work for your use-case.}

Despite very similar names C,C++ and C# are not the same languages.

C & C++ are compiled languages and the compiler generatrates the machine level code.

C# is generally compiled and interpreted (or better said JIT compiled) language at the same time. C# code is compiled to the special IL format which JIT compiled to the machine code. As it is JIT compiled you may dynamically runtime create assemblies - so the code may modify itself runtime. (Reflection emit)

So I believe that you have asked about the C#.

You can tell the index to sort its records already using geom as 2D by means of using the function ST_Force2D in the index creation, so that the database doesn't need to do it in query time: