learnvimscriptthehardway
kandi X-RAY | learnvimscriptthehardway Summary
kandi X-RAY | learnvimscriptthehardway Summary
learnvimscriptthehardway
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of learnvimscriptthehardway
learnvimscriptthehardway Key Features
learnvimscriptthehardway Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on learnvimscriptthehardway
QUESTION
I am trying to reproduce the example in chapter 15 of Steve Losh's "Learn Vimscript the Hard Way" (http://learnvimscriptthehardway.stevelosh.com/chapters/15.html), in the section called "Changing the Start."
First, I start vim with the following command:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-18 at 11:21TL;DR: use vim -u DEFAULTS foo
instead.
That should keep Vim in 'nocompatible'
mode, which is needed for codes to be recognized in mappings.
The symptoms you describe are consistent to having <
included in 'cpoptions'
, which is documented to:
Disable the recognition of special key codes in
<>
form in mappings, abbreviations, and the "to" part of menu commands. For example, the command:map X
results inX
being mapped to "" (5 characters) when
<
is included; but "^I
" (^I
is a real) when
<
is excluded.
That is consistent with you getting the literal result of your mapping in your command-line, without proper expansion of the and
key codes.
The defaults for 'cpoptions'
are:
Vim default: "aABceFs",
Vi default: all flags
So this means <
(along with all other flags) will be included by default in Vi mode, which is triggered when 'compatible'
is set (or, perhaps more accurately, when 'nocompatible'
is not set.)
It turns out that when you use -u NONE
in your command-line starting Vim, it will start in 'compatible'
mode.
You can use instead -u DEFAULTS
, which is quite similar to -u NONE
, but it will still load the defaults.vim
script shipped with Vim runtime, which will among other things set 'nocompatible'
.
From the docs:
When
-u DEFAULTS
(all uppercase) is passed, this has the same effect as-u NONE
, but thedefaults.vim
script is loaded, which will also set'nocompatible'
.Using the
-u
argument with another argument thanDEFAULTS
has the side effect that the'compatible'
option will be on by default. This can have unexpected effects.
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Apr-01 at 02:59When using Vimscript, I'd avoid :normal
-mode operations in favour of builtin functions that do the same things:
QUESTION
Consider the following file, stolen shamelessly from Learn Vimscript the Hard Way.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-29 at 09:55The backslashes inside the double quotes just need to be escaped once, so that "\\("
gives '\"
. The |
however needs to be escaped twice, once for the double quotes, and once again because otherwise it would conclude the :map
command. For that reason, I strongly recommend to use instead of
\|
inside of mappings. This is documented under :help map-bar
.
QUESTION
The YAML sections are started with ^---
, and don't have any ending delimiter. Example file:
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jan-18 at 09:31Using a function as Kent suggested is cleaner and more maintainable, but I was able to modify the original mapping and will post it here for completeness.
igemnace gave me some pointers on the #vim IRC chat. The crucial piece is that I can search for a line-ending in the file (not a literal newline) by including \n
in the search. Next, I need to change the motion characters since the match starts one line earlier. We need to go down a line from the upper match (j), and we don't need to go up (k) from the lower match. Finally, the search match region needs to be modified with \zs
so if the cursor is on the line before the header, vim doesn't think the cursor is overlapping the match. That would cause the editor to delete the wrong section in that case. The logic is:
- search backwards for
.*\zs\n--- \|\%$
- go down a line
- visual select until the next LOWER match
After all the escaping, that becomes:
QUESTION
I apologize in advanced for what appears to be such a simple question.
I have a sample command defined as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-14 at 04:59Using instead of
does what you are asking.
This command definition expands any supplied arguments when invoked
QUESTION
I have been working on developing a vim plugin for a little while, but have been stuck on a roadblock for a few weeks. My is written in vimscript, and it is a simple auto-pairing program for the ()
, {}
, []
, ""
, ''
pairs. I have been trying to get it to skip over over the right of the closing characters ( )
, }
, ]
) when it already exits. My focus right now is getting it to work just for the )
, ]
, }
characters.
My issue is that I having trouble getting the function to execute when the closing character input is entered.
Here's what I have tried so far: First Attempt:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Feb-08 at 22:30I am considering the first attempt in this working little improvement:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install learnvimscriptthehardway
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page