mad | mad is a markdown manual page viewer | Command Line Interface library

Sadly, decorators cannot change the type of what they decorate (as of TypeScript 4.3.2).

See TypeScript#4881 for a lot more discussion and context.

One option is to a create type for your added fields:

You can improve your query like this

You can't do this from command level. But I guess you could write container_commands script to rename your docker-compose file from docker-compose.dev.yml to docker-compose.yml:

You can use the container_commands key to execute commands that affect your application source code. Container commands run after the application and web server have been set up and the application version archive has been extracted, but before the application version is deployed.

UPDATE 12 Jun 2021

I tried to replicate the issue using simplified setup with just docker-compose.prod.yml and Docker running on 64bit Amazon Linux 2 3.4.1 EB platform.

docker-compose.prod.yml

When I try to compile this code, the rust compiler gets extremely mad. […] I know that rust can evaluate some expressions at compile time, is this just a case where that isn't allowed, or am I missing something?

You say that the compiler gets mad at you, but have you considered listening at what it was telling you?

Plugging your code into the playground, the first error is a trivial showstopper of

Firstly, your blanks state should be initialized as an empty object like this:

The code in the OP resembles a well-known variation of the Visitor design pattern known as an Internal Visitor (see e.g. Extensibility for the Masses. Practical Extensibility with Object Algebras by Bruno C. d. S. Oliveira and William R. Cook). That variation, however, uses generics and return values (instead of void) to solve some of the problems that the Visitor pattern addresses.

Which problem is that, and why is the OP variation probably insufficient?

The main problem addressed by the Visitor pattern is when you have heterogenous objects that you need to treat the same. As the Gang of Four, (the authors of Design Patterns) states, you use the pattern when

"an object structure contains many classes of objects with differing interfaces, and you want to perform operations on these objects that depend on their concrete classes."

What's missing from this sentence is that while you'd like to "perform operations on these objects that depend on their concrete classes", you want to treat those concrete classes as though they have a single polymorphic type.

Using the animal domain is rarely illustrative (I'll get back to that later), so here's another more realistic example. Examples are in C# - I hope they're still useful to you.

Imagine that you're developing an online restaurant reservation system. As part of that system, you need to be able to show a calendar to users. This calendar could display how many remaining seats are available on a given day, or list all reservations on the day.

Sometimes, you want to display a single day, but at other times, you want to display an entire month as a single calendar object. Throw in an entire year for good measure. This means that you have three periods: year, month, and day. Each has differing interfaces:

Try to decode the token to utf-8 when you encode it so

return jwt.encode(payload, settings.SECRET_KEY, algorithm='HS256').decode("utf-8")

And check if it works

More info here https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/issues/319

You can reduce your code to half if you use for loop and list.

Here is an example, you can modify the below code according to your need:

It's not flattening it per se. But the scale of the second line/plot is much bigger than the first that it shows like it's flattened.

You will need to use multiple scales (multiple y axis).

Check out this example from the matplotlib documentation.

Basically, you will need to do something like this: