protocol

Yes I can see what you mean, I have done this integration before you only forget the priority statement otherwise should run well, please add this to your code;

after

apply { ipv4_lpm.apply();

ADD:

How about using TaggedOutput.

While editing my initial question to add more context as Jay proposed I think it found the issue.

What probably happens? The view where the crash is, contains a table view. Each cell will be configured before being presented. I use a flag which holds the information, if the amount of weight for this cell (it is a strength workout app) has been initially set or is a change. When prepareForReuse is being called, this flag has not been reset. And that now means scrolling through the table view triggers a DB write for each reused cell, that leads to unnecessary writes to the db. Unnecessary, because the exact same number is already saved in the db.

My speculation: Scrolling fast could maybe lead to a race condition (I have read something about that issue with realm) and that maybe causes this weird crash, because there are multiple single writes initiated in a short time.

Solution: I now reset the flag on prepareForReuse to its initial value to prevent this misbehaviour.

The crash only happens when the cell is set up and the described behaviour happens. Therefor I'm quite confident I fixed the issue finally. Let's see. -- I was not able to reproduce the issue, but it also only happens pretty rare.

Your repository is private and requires login to pull image.

You need to create a registry credentials secret for kubernetes, as it do not uses docker credentials.

See https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/pull-image-private-registry/

1. Create a secret named regcred:

it looks like the variable that has value is amp;code; not code. Do you have 2 ampersands somewhere by any chance? Yes you do -

I believe what you want is the following:

The documentation for the azurerm_web_application_firewall_policy resource is out of date but http_listener_ids and path_based_rule_ids are read only now (as of v2.55.0) so you can't set them and can only read them as an attribute of the resource.

I'm struggling to understand how that code fits together, but this part strikes me as definitely wrong:

Here I'm wondering about the line [in s_client]
New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384

You're apparently using OpenSSL 1.0.2, where that's a basically useless relic. Back in the days when OpenSSL supported SSLv2 (mostly until 2010, although almost no one used it much after 2000), the ciphersuite values used for SSLv3 and up (including all TLS, but before 2014 OpenSSL didn't implement higher than TLS1.0) were structured differently than those used for SSLv2, so it was important to qualify the ciphersuite by the 'universe' it existed in. It has almost nothing to do with the protocol version actually used, which appears later in the session-param decode: