orchestration | Orchestrate webitel containers | Job Orchestrator library
kandi X-RAY | orchestration Summary
kandi X-RAY | orchestration Summary
Orchestrate webitel containers
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of orchestration
orchestration Key Features
orchestration Examples and Code Snippets
$ cd /opt
$ git clone https://github.com/webitel/orchestration.git
$ cd /opt/orchestration
$ git tag -l
$ git checkout v3.11.7
$ sudo cat /opt/orchestration/etc/sysctl.conf >> /etc/sysctl.conf
$ sudo sysctl -p
$ sudo apparmor_parser -R /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.tcpdump
sudo -s
docker exec -it freeswitch openssl req -new -newkey rsa:2048 -x509 -sha256 -days 900 -nodes -keyout /certs/key.pem -out /certs/cert.pem
cat /opt/webitel/ssl/key.pem /opt/webitel/ssl/cert.pem > /opt/webitel/ssl/dtls-srtp.pem
def levenshtein_distance(first_word: str, second_word: str) -> int:
"""Implementation of the levenshtein distance in Python.
:param first_word: the first word to measure the difference.
:param second_word: the second word to measure th
public ServiceDiscoveryService discover(OrchestrationChapter orchestrationChapterService) {
services.put(orchestrationChapterService.getName(), orchestrationChapterService);
return this;
}
public Optional find(String service) {
return Optional.ofNullable(services.getOrDefault(service, null));
}
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on orchestration
QUESTION
I'm trying to figure out what the best option to solving this problem. I have an frontend application that will cater for both normal user and different company users. I want the normal user to only see the email and password fields while the company user see their respective IDP without seeing other company's IDPs.
At first, I was thinking of using a custom policy to achieve this. Basically I'll have a custom claim in the outputclaims that will specify the domain and inside my orchestration I'll have a precondition if it doesn't exist then use email and password step and skip everything but if it exist, then skip the email and password and match it to an idp selection step (if domain == companyX) use CompanyX's IDP (GSuite) or (if domain == companyY) use CompanyY's Idp (AAD). So when the company users gets to the selection page they can only see their IDP and not the others. I'm not sure how scalable that would be though.
The second option I thought was to have one ROPC policy for the normal users and use another policy for IDP selection but this time passing a domain_hint when user attempts to login in. The reason why I would go with ROPC on this option is to give user consistent user experience, normal user sees fields on the page while company user sees a single IDP button that directly sign through the domain_hint directly (Sign-Direct). Essentially having all the UI controlled by me instead of azure.
Example:
- domain_hint=CompanyX - I would have a TechnicalProfile with the domain CompanyX (GSuite)
- domain_hint=CompanyY - I would have a TechnicalProfile with the domain CompanyX (AAD)
Now this approach seem to be more intuitive but now my concern is that since ROPC uses Authorization Flow which contains refresh token while the Idp selection flow uses OpenIdConnect which doesn't contain refresh token (or at least managed by AzureB2C) it would screw up how I manage my tokens.
Is there a better way to implement this situation?
I feel like I'm missing something or I'm misinterpreting something.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 14:23This sample shows how to implement your first option. The technique is called "home realm discovery". https://github.com/azure-ad-b2c/samples/tree/master/policies/home-realm-discovery-modern
QUESTION
I'm trying to get JSON data from an API in my project. However, I came to an error and I'm completely stuck. I'm fairly new when it comes to deserializing JSON objects so appreciate your help on this.
This is my JSON file
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 12:09The problem is you are passing respons.body["data"]["data"] to your Datum.fromJson() constructor but there is no such key in the json. on the other hand you are passing response.body["data"] to Car.fromJson() constructor which is a list of data that does not have "status" key in it.
Try changing your code as follows.
QUESTION
I'm beginner in Project Reactor
and think it's pretty easy, but I can't find the solution.
I have N
expensive tasks to do, and I want to implement something like Bounded Semaphore
in Java (do not request next element until current count of running task less than K
).
Shortly: complete all tasks, but no more K
tasks at the same time
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 14:18What about this solution? I removed parallel from Flux, in order to bufferize 10 elements. Each elements can be then handled in parallel
QUESTION
So, I'm very new to Docker and I'm trying to use it to containerize an ASP.NET (Framework 4.7.2) application. My platform is Windows 10 and the application is to run under a Windows container. Here's what I've done:
- Click on "Add -> Docker Support..." when right-clicking the project in Visual Studio.
- Waiting for it to generate a Dockerfile.
- Clicking "Run".
A generic 500 IIS error pops up when Chrome launches, and it opens at IP 172.26.102.145 rather than localhost:port, like it normally does when running without Docker. I looked at the event logs and this is what I see:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 23:00This problem turned out to be a red herring, with the real issue found by looking at IIS application logs within the docker container. I suggest anyone facing this to open up powershell in the container by running:
docker container exec -it powershell
Then browse the application logs with:
Get-EventLog -LogName Application -Newest 15
You may see an issue there. Also, you can try running this in the container to see if an error is spit out:
Invoke-WebRequest http://localhost
QUESTION
I'm trying to write a generic function to do some Webflux operations and I'm getting a class cast exception that I can't figure out
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-05 at 18:24This works so you're probably not getting a ViewModel
back from your webClient body but rather the map
of parameters (or something) from the ViewModel
.
QUESTION
I am getting below error if I am including dot(.) in orchestration project name in visual studio though required dll is added in references. Its allowing me to keep project name as ENTITYSRCDESTOrchestrations but not allowing ENTITY.SRC.DEST.Orchestrations.
...Error: Severity: Error
Code: CS0234
Description: The type or namespace name 'Common_Orchestrations' does not exist in the namespace 'Entity.SRC.PS' (are you missing an assembly reference?)
Project: ENTITY.SRC.DEST.Orchestrations
File: I:\ENTITY.SRC.DEST\ENTITY.SRC.DEST.Orchestrations\obj\Release\BizTalk\XLang\File1.cs
Line: 9
Suppression State: Active
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 15:50Please check if you are missing the reference of your project. This error is clearly stating "missing an assembly reference" Please refer to Microsoft Doc to get the resolution, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/biztalk/core/build-errors-in-the-task-list#compiler-asks-if-you-are-missing-an-assembly-reference
QUESTION
In attempting to set up Prefect 0.14.15 for Flow execution across multiple Agents using the Docker Compose file produced by prefect server config
, I was surprised to discover that that Prefect's Server requires a Tenant in order for an Agent to connect. I investigated to find that Prefect's docs provide info on the usage syntax of their create-tenant and list-tenants CLI operations. However, I've looked extensively through the linked pages — along with the rest of Prefect's documentation and accompanying tutorials — for any mention of Tenants, and only found the following brief mention:
Once authenticated, user-based API keys can be used to generate short-lived JWT auth tokens for any tenant the user belongs to. These API keys inherit any permissions the user has in that tenant, allowing full API access.
What, exactly, is a Tenant in Prefect? It doesn't appear to be specific to Prefect's Hybrid Execution model. How, then, does it fit into the interactions between the Server, Agents, and Client before and during the execution of a Prefect Flow? What does it mean to say that a user "belongs to" or is "in" a tenant? And what is accomplished by requiring it to register an Agent with the Server?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 14:49A tenant has far less meaning in Prefect Server than Prefect Cloud but since Cloud is built on the open source Server code, the idea persists there.
A tenant is the top-level object which all other objects exist in. A user in a tenant cannot access anything in another tenant. In Cloud, this permissioning is strictly enforced to limit the scope of a user's access. In Server, you just need a tenant to begin using the system because most objects will be linked back to a tenant. Typically, a default tenant is created for you during startup if you use the Prefect CLI prefect server start
or you can toggle automatic creation in the Prefect Server Helm chart.
When an agent is registered with the server, we store details about that agent in the 'agents' table of the database. In Server, your agent is associated with the default tenant. In Cloud, your agent is associated with the tenant that the API Key used to start the agent belongs to.
When you run a flow, the Client must talk to the server to report the status of the flow. As with the agent, this flow run is associated with a tenant. In Cloud, this inherits the API Key of the agent. In Server, we will continue to use the default tenant.
tldr; Tenants are the basis for Prefect Cloud Teams that a user belongs to and are used for permissioning. In Prefect Server, you just need to have one; create it and forget about it (or use our standard tooling which creates it for you).
QUESTION
I have a setup as follows:
- Docker host: CentOS
- Docker node: CentOS
- Orchestration: Swarmpit
When I try to start up my Sonarqube container, I get the error
ERROR: [1] bootstrap checks failed. You must address the points described in the following [1] lines before starting Elasticsearch.
bootstrap check failure [1] of [1]: max virtual memory areas vm.max_map_count [65530] is too low, increase to at least [262144]
What I have tried:
On the host:
- sysctl -w vm.max_map_count=262144
- sysctl -p
- sysctl --system
- docker restart (swarmpit app container id)
I see the task retry and the same error comes up. On a whim, I checked the node OS where the docker service was deployed to and that still has the 65530 value. Does anyone know if this value needs to be changed on all the nodes? I assume so, but there's no mention anywhere I have found on the interwebs.
Appreciate any help on this!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-27 at 19:33So it looks like changing the value on the swarm nodes is the way to go. Same instructions as fixing the issue on a single container host, but on each node. #GrayHairMinimized
QUESTION
I am considering porting a legacy pipeline that builds and tests Docker/OCI images into GitLab CI/CD. I already have a GitLab Runner in a Kubernetes cluster and it's registered to a GitLab instance. Testing a particular image requires running certain commands inside (for running unit tests, etc.). Presumably this could be modeled by a job my_test
like so:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-27 at 18:09Your first look should be at Services.
With services you can start a container running MySQL
or Postgres
and run tests which will connect to it.
QUESTION
I have an existing function app that I have been experimenting with using VS Code and .NET 5. I have the latest Azure Functions extension installed. When I do Azure Functions: create function
, I do not get see the Durable Orchestration Function. However, if I create another function app using .NET 3.1 and do create function
, I see the Durable template. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 06:15azure durable functions for '.net 5' is not supported now.
Check this announcement:
The announcement stated that there is no plan to provide support in this area for the time being, and it may only begin to be gradually realized in 2022. So if you want to use durable function, you still need to be based on something like .Net Core 3.1.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install orchestration
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page