lemmatizer | English word lemmatizer | Natural Language Processing library
kandi X-RAY | lemmatizer Summary
kandi X-RAY | lemmatizer Summary
English word lemmatizer
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of lemmatizer
lemmatizer Key Features
lemmatizer Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on lemmatizer
QUESTION
I got a lemmatize output from the below code with a output words consisting of " : , ? , !, ( )" symbols
output_H3 = [lemmatizer.lemmatize(w.lower(), pos=wordnet.VERB) for w in processed_H3_tag]
output :-
- ['hide()', 'show()', 'methods:', 'jquery', 'slide', 'elements:', 'launchedw3schools', 'today!']
Expected output :-
- ['hide', 'show', 'methods', 'jquery', 'slide', 'elements', 'launchedw3schools', 'today']
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-21 at 04:59Regular Expressions can help:
QUESTION
i'm using spacy in conjunction with flask and anaconda to create a simple webservice. Everything worked fine, until today when i tried to run my code. I got this error and i don't understand what the problem really is. I think this problem has more to do with spacy than flask.
Here's the code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-21 at 12:16What you are getting is an internal error from spaCy
. You use the en_core_web_trf
model provided by spaCy
. It's not even a third-party model. It seems to be completely internal to spaCy
.
You could try upgrading spaCy
to the latest version.
The registry name scorers
appears to be valid (at least as of spaCy
v3.0). See this table: https://spacy.io/api/top-level#section-registry
The page describing the model you use: https://spacy.io/models/en#en_core_web_trf
The spacy.load()
function documentation: https://spacy.io/api/top-level#spacy.load
QUESTION
I need to add the function within the print function to a variable to be calledd to be printed only from the variable name.
My code -
for w in processed_H2_tag: print(lemmatizer.lemmatize(w.lower(), pos=wordnet.VERB))
Expected - Print(output)
"Output" is to be defined
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-20 at 18:10You mean how to instead of printing get all the values into a list which you can then print?
You can do that with a list comprehension:
QUESTION
I have two CSV, one is the Master-Data and the other is the Component-Data, Master-Data has Two Rows and two columns, where as Component-Data has 5 rows and two Columns.
I'm trying to find the cosine-similarity between each of them after Tokenization, Stemming and Lemmatization and then append the similarity index to the new columns, I'm unable to append the corresponding values to the column in the data-frame which is further needs to be converted to CSV.
My Approach:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-20 at 11:20Here's what I came up with:
Sample set upQUESTION
I am trying to apply preprocessing steps to my data. I have 6 functions to preprocess data and I call these functions in preprocess function. It works when I try these functions one by one with the example sentence.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-17 at 14:18First problem that can be identified is that your convert_lower_case
returns something different than it accepts - which could be perfectly fine, if treated properly. But you keep treating your data
as a string, which it no longer is after data = convert_lower_case(data)
"But it looks like a string when I print it" - yeah, but it isn't a string. You can see that if you do this:
QUESTION
I just started to explore spaCy and need it only for GPE (Global political entities) of the name entity recognition (NER) component.
So, to save time on loading I keep only 'ner':
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-01 at 04:03It isn't possible to do this. The NER model is classifying each token/span between all the labels it knows about, and the knowledge is not separable.
Additionally, the NER component requires a tok2vec. Depending on the pipeline architecture you may be able to disable the top-level tok2vec. (EDIT: I incorrectly stated the top-level tok2vec was required for the small English model; it is not. See here for details.)
It may be possible to train a smaller model that only recognizes GPEs with similar accuracy, but I wouldn't be too optimistic about it. It also wouldn't be faster.
QUESTION
I am currently working with python NLTK to preprocess text data for Kaggle SMS Spam Classification Dataset. I have completed the following steps during preprocessing:
- Removed any extra spaces
- Removed punctuation and special characters
- Converted the text to lower case
- Replaced abbreviations such as lol,brb etc with their meaning or full form.
- Removed stop words
- Tokenized the data
Now I plan to perform lemmatization and stemming separately on the tokenized data followed by TF-IDF done separately on lemmatized data and stemmed data.
Questions are as follows:
- Is there a practical use case to perform lemmatization on the tokenized data and then stem that lemmatized data or vice versa
- Does the idea of stemming the lemmatized data or vice versa make any sense theoretically, or is it completely incorrect.
Context: I am relatively new to NLP and hence I am trying to understand as much as I can about these concepts. The main idea behind this question is to understand whether lemmatization or stemming together make any sense theoretically/practically or whether these should be done separately.
Questions Referenced:
- Should I perform both lemmatization and stemming?: The answer to this question was inconclusive and not accepted, it never discussed why you should or should not do it in the first place.
- What is the difference between lemmatization vs stemming?: Provides the ideas behind stemming and lemmatization but I was unable to conclude the answers to my questions based on this
- Stemmers vs Lemmatizers: Explains the pros and cons, as well as the context in which stemming and lemmatization, might help
- NLP Stemming and Lemmatization using Regular expression tokenization: The question discusses the different preprocessing steps and does stemming and lemmatization separately
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-25 at 10:39Is there a practical use case to perform lemmatization on the tokenized data and then stem that lemmatized data or vice versa
Does the idea of stemming the lemmatized data or vice versa make any sense theoretically, or is it completely incorrect.
Regarding (1): Lemmatisation and stemming do essentially the same thing: they convert an inflected word form to a canonical form, on the assumption that features expressed through morphology (such as word endings) are not important for the use case. If you are not interested in tense, number, voice, etc, then lemmatising/stemming will reduce the number of distinct word forms you have to deal with (as different variations get folded into one canonical form). So without knowing what you want to do exactly, and whether morphological information is relevant to that task, it's hard to answer.
Lemmatisation is a linguistically motivated procedure. Its output is a valid word in the target language, but with endings etc removed. It is not without information loss, but there are not that many problematic cases. Is does a third person singular auxiliary verb, or the plural of a female deer? Is building a noun, referring to a structure, or a continuous form of the verb to build? What about housing? A casing for an object (such as an engine) or the process of finding shelter for someone?
Stemming is a less resource intense procedure, but as a trade-off it works with approximations only. You will have less precise results, which might not matter too much in an application such as information retrieval, but if you are at all interested in meaning, then it is probably too coarse a tool. Its output also will not be a word, but a 'stem', basically a character string roughly related to those you get when stemming similar words.
Re (2): no, it doesn't make any sense. Both procedures attempt the same task (normalising inflected words) in different ways, and once you have lemmatised, stemming is pointless. And if you stem first, you generally do not end up with valid words, so lemmatisation would not work anyway.
QUESTION
I am new to using LSI with Python and Gensim + Scikit-learn tools. I was able to achieve topic modeling on a corpus using LSI from both the Scikit-learn and Gensim libraries, however, when using the Gensim approach I was not able to display a list of documents to topic mapping.
Here is my work using Scikit-learn LSI where I successfully displayed document to topic mapping:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 19:27In order to get the representation of a document (represented as a bag-of-words) from a trained LsiModel
as a vector of topics, you use Python dict-style bracket-accessing (model[bow]
).
For example, to get the topics for the 1st item in your training data, you can use:
QUESTION
If i had the following dataframe:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-11 at 17:18For a best output, you can use spacy
QUESTION
First step is tokenizing the text from dataframe using NLTK. Then, I create a spelling correction using TextBlob. For this, I convert the output from tuple to string. After that, I need to lemmatize/stem (using NLTK). The problem is my output return in a strip-format. Thus, it cannot be lemmatized/stemmed.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-02 at 14:10I got where the problem is, the dataframes are storing these arrays as a string. So, the lemmatization is not working. Also note that, it is from the spell_eng part.
I have written a solution, which is a slight modification for your code.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install lemmatizer
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page