sdk-js | Tanker client-side encryption SDK for JavaScript | Cryptography library
kandi X-RAY | sdk-js Summary
kandi X-RAY | sdk-js Summary
Tanker is an open-source solution to protect sensitive data in any application, with a simple end-user experience and good performance. No cryptographic skills are required to implement it.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of sdk-js
sdk-js Key Features
sdk-js Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on sdk-js
QUESTION
As our logging mechanism is not able to create big gz-files, I'm trying to do it with a lambda. It works when I load all of them from S3 into the memory and afterwards create the gzip file. But this needs too much memory. This is why I try the following: Start a gzip stream into memory and when I receive the content of a file from S3, I write it to the gzip stream. Without luck. Besides other ideas, I tried the code below.
I read from here https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js/issues/2961 that the aws-sdk needs to know the length of a stream. That's why I use the streamToBuffer function which was also described on the given link.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-11 at 17:23I finally got it working! I don't have to set the encoding for gzip but during the write. This is my code which is creating correct gzip-files:
QUESTION
I am new to java and android. And on running the emulator I am facing this merge conflict issue.
Complete Error message:
Execution failed for task ':processDefaultsDebugMainManifest'.
Manifest merger failed with multiple errors, see logs
Error: android:exported needs to be explicitly specified for element . Apps targeting Android 12 and higher are required to specify an explicit value for
android:exported
when the corresponding component has an intent filter defined. See https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element#exported for details. main manifest (this file), line 35
Here AndroidManifest.xml
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-30 at 08:08Your libraries are defining probably an "intent_filter" on an activity
QUESTION
For a while now I've been using dropbopx-sdk-js in a Meteor application without any trouble.
My Meteor app simply uses Dropbox to fetch images to be used in product cards. These files are synced now and then and that's it. By synced what I mean is they are scanned, shared links created or obtained, and some info is then saved in Mongo (name, extension, path, public link)
End users do not remove nor add files, nor are the files related to an end user specific account.
To achieve this, I created (in the far past) an App in the Dropbox App Console, generated a permanent token, and used that token in my Meteor app to handle all the syncing.
Now I've tried to replicate that very same thing in a new similar project, but found that the permanent tokens have been recently deprecated and are no longer an option.
Now, checking Dropbox's Authentication Types it seems to me like "App Authentication"
"This type only uses the app's own app key and secret, and doesn't identify a specific user or team".
is what I'm after. I can safely provide app key and secret in the server exclusively, as the client will never need those. The question is how do I achieve such kind of authentication? Or for that matter, how do I achieve an equivalent of the long-lived token for my app, ultimately meaning that end users don't actually need to know Dropbox is behind the scenes in any way (and they surely don't need dropbox accounts to use this app nor should be prompted with any Dropbox authentication page)
In the js-sdk examples repo, I only found this example using app key and secret. Yet afterwards it goes through the oauth process in the browser anyways. If I don't do the oauth part, I get an error
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-10 at 22:23The short answer is:
You need to obtain a refresh-token. You can then use this token for as long as you want. But in order to get it is necessary to go through at least one oauth flow in the browser. Then capturing the generated refresh-token in the backend. Then store it and use it to initialize the API. So it's kind of "hacky" (IMO).
For example, you can use the mentioned example code, and log/store the obtained refresh token in this line (as per Greg's accepted answer in the forum). Then use that value as a constant to immediately call the setRefreshToken
method (as done in that very same line) upon initialization.
The long answer is:
- ClientId + Client secret are not enough to programmatically generate a refresh token.
- Going through the oauth flow at least once is mandatory to obtain a refresh token
- If you want to hide such flow from your clients, you'll need to do what the short answer says.
- The intended flow of usage according to Dropbox is: each user access his own files. Having several users accessing a single folder is not officially supported.
The longer answer is:
Check out the conversation we had in the dropbox forum
I suggested to replace the "Generate Access Token" button in the console for a "Generate Refresh Token" button instead. At least it made sense to me according to what we discussed. Maybe if it gets some likes... ;).
QUESTION
EDITTED AFTER Deeksha's answer
Following the blog post to create a custom OData client using Cloud SDK's Generator for JavaScript & Deeksha's suggestion, I run the following command to create my OData client:
sdk_test % generate-odata-client --inputDir resources/ --outputDir out/ --forceOverwrite
I have used the edmx of the candidate api as suggested in the post (e.g., edmx file downloaded from here). Version of the generator:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-06 at 11:26The CLI you are using is going to be deprecated soon and is therefore not maintained. That's a potential failure reason.
Please use the new SAP Cloud SDK's Odata generator to generate your custom clients. You can install the client by running:
QUESTION
Since I have fallen into the AWS trap and not ignoring the info message on the Elastic Transcoder Page saying that, we should start using Elemental MediaConverter instead, pretty much nothing is working as expected.
I have set up the Elemental MediaConvert following these steps. I have to admit that setting up everything in the console was pretty easy and I was soon able to transcode my videos which are stored on my S3 bucket.
Unfortunately, the time had to come when I was forced to do the transcoding from my web application, using the @aws-sdk/client-mediaconvert. Apart from not finding any docs on how to use the SDK, I cannot even successfully connect to the service, since apparently MediaConvert does not support CORS.
So my question is, did anyone use MediaConvert with the SDK successfully? And if yes, could you please tell me what to do?
Here is my configuration so far:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-25 at 17:02So, after almost two entire days of trial and error plus digging into the source code, I finally found a solution! To make it short: unauthenticated access and MediaConvert will not work!
The entire problem is Cognito
which does not allow access to MediaConvert
operations on unauthenticated access. Here is the access list.
Since I am using Auth0 for my user authentication I was simply following this guide and basically all my problems were gone! To attach the token I was using
QUESTION
I was doing some hands on with the new SvelteKit FE using AWS Amplify to use Cognito service to authenticated my app and everything run fine in dev mode. But then, I tried to build it for deployment and this is where the fun begin...
First, I was not able to simply build the app. There was an error with Vite not able to correctly "interpret" the "browser" field!? :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-01 at 03:54I'm not entirely sure this gets you on the right track, but one thing that has helped me out with package import weirdness, especially when it's between dev and build, is vite's optimizedDeps
config directive. Perhaps something within the AWS package(s) is not liking the pre-bundling that vite is doing and you need to exclude it? This might help explain why things run fine while in dev.
QUESTION
I'm wanting to port a JavaScript
code to Kotlin
or Java
while using the Android Parse library, but the Java
Parse library doesn't have the function "ParseObject.extend()" because what "extend" does in JavaScript
cannot be done in the Java
world as far as I could understand. The question is now what would the alternative be, how can I port following code to Java
or Kotlin
?:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-24 at 09:42What I did was following:
QUESTION
I was able to connect without issue using the legacy version of the JavaScript SDK, but v2 yields the following error when running the pub_sub sample:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-02 at 22:20It looks like the resources defined in the iot:Connect
statement of the policy were to blame: the only resource needed is the actual client itself. The following policy has resolved the issue for me:
QUESTION
I have created the S3 Bucket with Serverless Framework like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-18 at 22:58I am confused with your explanation of your existing system (sorry!), but the general approach would be one of the following:
Using Cognito
Your back-end can use Cognito to authenticate the user and then use AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity
to return a set of credentials. The user's client can then use those credentials to directly access AWS services based on the the assigned permissions.
For example, they might be permitted to access their own subdirectory in an Amazon S3 bucket, or read from a specific DynamoDB table. This can be done by sending requests directly to AWS rather than going via the back-end.
Using pre-signed URLs
If your goal is purely to grant access to private objects in Amazon S3, then instead of using Cognito, your back-end can generate Amazon S3 pre-signed URLs that provide time-limited access to private objects.
Whenever the back-end is generating a page that contains a reference to a private object (eg via tags), it can do the following:
- The app verifies that the user is entitled to access the private object by checking information in the app's database
- If the user is entitled to access the private object, the back-end generates a pre-signed URL
- The pre-signed URL is returned in the HTML page (or even as a direct link)
- When S3 receives the pre-signed URL, it verifies the signature and, if it is correct, returns the private object
The benefit of this approach is that the app can determine fine-grained access to individual objects rather than simply using buckets and prefixes to define access. This can be very useful in situations where data is shared between users (eg a photo-sharing app where users can share photos with other users) on a per-object basis.
Don't mix
In looking through your code samples, it appears that your Cognito roles are granting access to specific parts of an S3 bucket:
QUESTION
Been trying to test out the aws-iot-device-sdk-v2
library for a bit. I am currently trying to test out the sample app provided by the AWS dev team. I am trying to test out the system incrementally. This is the code I have tested so far:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-15 at 18:52Wasn't able to identify why I couldn't use AwsCredentialsProvider
as expected but found a work-around. Instead, I was able to initialize the builder with const config_builder = iot.AwsIotMqttConnectionConfigBuilder.new_with_websockets();
. Anyway, didn't figure out why I couldn't utilize AwsCredentialsProvider
as expected. Might be something to look into if the dev team has time. 👍
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install sdk-js
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page