airflags | Airtable as a JavaScript feature flags | Access Management library
kandi X-RAY | airflags Summary
kandi X-RAY | airflags Summary
Airtable as a JavaScript feature flags
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of airflags
airflags Key Features
airflags Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Access Management
QUESTION
I have a setup like this:
Back-end REST API application - Single Instance running in Cloud Server - Let's call it as A
Public Users` Mobile app & browser clients - Let's call them together as X
We already are using Keycloak for Identity and Access Management. As per the current setup,
- X to A uses Password grant flow, that is – a client is created in Keycloak with Client-Type as Public for user management and auth of X to A.
Now, we have to introduce new layer of back-end app, that is,
- Back-end REST API application - Multiple Instances running in On-prem Servers across different physical locations - Let's call them together as B.
Now, both B and X both are clients of A, [i.e. A serve both B and X].
Please clarify:
Should I create another type of client in the same realm for B, like below?
- B to A: Client credentials grant flow i.e. I have to create another Client-Type as Confidential for B to A, to configure a service-account for each of the instances of B.
- If yes, please guide me on how to configure both Auth flows in A i.e. A has to auth both B and X.
- B to A: Client credentials grant flow i.e. I have to create another Client-Type as Confidential for B to A, to configure a service-account for each of the instances of B.
I feel like this one as a bad idea - Using the existing setup as it is, which is explained below.
As per the new business logic,
X logs-in the app (mobile/web app) using username and password and calls an API of A to generate a QR Code, which will contain the hash of the user's (X's) access token and some other info.
A stores both hash and access token of X in the database
B gets the hash of the access token used by X to access A, from the QR Code scanned by the user. B uses the hash to validate the authenticity of the QRCode, by calling an API of A
As mentioned in the above business logic, if needed, A can expose an API, where the above said user access token can be retrieved through a get request, by sending the hash as a request header param or query. This token can be further used by B for further API calls to A.
I think that the above idea is bad, because, we are not supposed to send the user access token over the internet, even if there is a SSL/TLS connection between B and A.
- Can the Client-Type, Bearer-Only be used in this scenario between B and A? If yes, Please guide me on this.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-08 at 11:25As you are having both Public and On prem services as clients, I would suggest the following:
- As you said, X as public client shall use Password grant
- B should use Client Credentials mechanism to get itself authenticated with Keycloak. Keycloak will provide it the access token through ${kc.realm-url}/protocol/openid-connect/token endpoint. This access token can be sent to A.
- "A" should also be a registered client with its own credentials.
- When "A" receives request from X or B, it should use a mechanism called Token verification through Introspection endpoint where it will get the token verified by calling Keycloak. Introspection endpoint expects access token, client id and client secret.
This way, A can be sure that the token received by it is indeed issued by Keycloak.
QUESTION
On GCP, I'm trying to enable "Identity and Access Management (IAM) API" with this Terraform code below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 03:39QUESTION
I'm making this custom dashboard using google analytics reporting api and MERN stack which allow users to create an account or login and choose whatever analytics they want to see depending on the filters they pick. But I'm having a problem where users have to add my API email manually to their account access management list so I can fetch Data from their google analytics accounts.
My Question is how can I use the reporting API without users having to give me permission?
I've seen a tutorial where users login with their google accounts but I want to implement my own User authentication.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-25 at 13:46The first thing you need to understand is the diffrence bettween public and private user data.
Public data is data that is well public. Anyone can access it. Public videos upload to youtube for example is public data.
Private data on the other hand is data that is owned by user. In order to access private user data you need the consent of the owner of that data or someone that has access to it.
My Question is how can I use the reporting API without users having to give me permission?
The answer is that you cant. You can not access a users private google analytics data without the consent of that user. The user will need to authorize your application and consent to your application accessing their data.
I've seen a tutorial where users login with their google accounts but I want to implement my own User authentication.
You can do that you can have your own login server and authorize users. But you are still going to have to request their consent to access their private Google analytics data on top of that.
QUESTION
Note: I realize that this is close to being off-topic for being opinion-based, but I am hoping that there is some accepted best practice to handle this that I just don't know about.
My problem is the following: I need to design a Rest API for a program where users can create their own projects, and each project contains files that can only be seen by users that have access. I am stuck with how to design the "List all files of a project" query.
Standard Rest API practice would suggest two endpoints, like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-10 at 12:27After looking further, I came across this document from Microsoft. Some quotes:
Also consider the relationships between different types of resources and how you might expose these associations. For example, the /customers/5/orders might represent all of the orders for customer 5. You could also go in the other direction, and represent the association from an order back to a customer with a URI such as /orders/99/customer. However, extending this model too far can become cumbersome to implement. A better solution is to provide navigable links to associated resources in the body of the HTTP response message. This mechanism is described in more detail in the section Use HATEOAS to enable navigation to related resources.
In more complex systems, it can be tempting to provide URIs that enable a client to navigate through several levels of relationships, such as /customers/1/orders/99/products. However, this level of complexity can be difficult to maintain and is inflexible if the relationships between resources change in the future. Instead, try to keep URIs relatively simple. Once an application has a reference to a resource, it should be possible to use this reference to find items related to that resource. The preceding query can be replaced with the URI /customers/1/orders to find all the orders for customer 1, and then /orders/99/products to find the products in this order.
This makes me think that using solution 2 is probably the best case for me, since each file will be associated with only a single project, and should be deleted when a project is deleted. Files cannot exist on their own, outside of projects.
QUESTION
Specs:
- The serverless Amazon MSK that's in preview.
- t2.xlarge EC2 instance with Amazon Linux 2
- Installed Kafka from https://dlcdn.apache.org/kafka/3.0.0/kafka_2.13-3.0.0.tgz
- openjdk version "11.0.13" 2021-10-19 LTS
- OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.13+8-LTS)
- OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.13+8-LTS, mixed mode, sharing)
- Gradle 7.3.3
- https://github.com/aws/aws-msk-iam-auth, successfully built.
I also tried adding IAM authentication information, as recommended by the Amazon MSK Library for AWS Identity and Access Management. It says to add the following in config/client.properties:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-17 at 05:00The created properties file is not automatically used; your command needs to include --command-config client.properties, where this properties file is documented at the MSK docs on the linked IAM page.
Extract...
QUESTION
-Objective- I need to set, in a Inline Formset, the current user as automatic content of a field of the form. (Currently not working)
Version Python 3.9.2 - Django 3.2
Context: I've created a List, where I have some objects(Headers). From the list I can create new headers and access to the detail-page(Detailview)for each of these by using a foreign-key(called by PK-primarykey).
In this page I can see more informations about 1 specific header. Each header can have multiple lines of informations that need to be linked to it. The lines are created or updated with (max 4 different) specific Inline Formsets.
-Issue and Error- I created the forms that are correctly rendered, but I need to set for each line, a field that automatically gets "current user" as its content. I can't save and receive instead"User cannot be null".
I'm unable to find a solutions and tried many things but stuck with this error.
Would kindly appreciate any help on how to solve this problem. Thanks in advance,
Below some code:
URLS.PY
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-24 at 08:04For audit fields like creator and modifier model fields I will usually set blank=True, null=True in the model field definition. Just by doing that your code will work, because you are already handling setting of dea_creator and dea_modifier in your views.
If you want to enforce this in the database like you are doing now, you will have to pass the request.user to your formset and set it as the initial value for the dea_creator field when initializing the forms.
Edit:
The alternative way I mentioned above, in your HeadfttlogDeafttlogFormset, instead of setting fields and widgets, create an actual form to use, for example DeafttlogForm, and set the fields and widgets there. Then in your formset, you set form=DeafttlogForm.
In the newly created DeafttlogForm, initialize the dea_creator field:
QUESTION
I'm working in an environment where IdentityIQ 8.2 is deployed for access management.
I am attempting to return a list of users, based on if they have any one of the entitlements in the provided "whitelist". (i.e. "Show me any user who has entitlement1 or entitlement2 or entitlement3")
I tried to use the Advanced Analytics search function. This does allow you to search for identities based on entitlement, but it function in an "Exclusive AND" logic style where only users who have every single entitlement on your "whitelist" will be returned. I haven't found a way to change this. The Advanced Search type doesn't support searching by entitlement, from what I can tell.
Is there an out of the box way to accomplish this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-22 at 16:24You can create the entitlement search with AND and save the result as a Population. You can then change operation="AND" to operation="OR" using the Debug pages.
Example how to search for users who have either of these two AD group memberships (this is a Population saved from Advanced Analytics):
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-11 at 16:04but this is bad
QUESTION
this is the error i received
Error: Invalid hook call. Hooks can only be called inside of the body of a function component. This could happen for one of the following reasons:
- You might have mismatching versions of React and the renderer (such as React DOM)
- You might be breaking the Rules of Hooks
- You might have more than one copy of React in the same app See https://reactjs.org/link/invalid-hook-call for tips about how to debug and fix this problem.
This is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-21 at 11:54You cannot use useState in non functional component. You're using it in a method called HandleAdd. HandleAdd is not a component! You're using classify component. You need to move the HandleAdd into your component and use the class component's own state and setState :
QUESTION
In my company, we have an internal Security Token Service consumed by all web apps to validate the STS token issued by the company central access management server (e.g BigIP/APM). Therefore the same endpoint for token validation REST API has to be repeatedly set as an environment variable in Deployment Configuration for each individual web app (Openshift project). So is an ES256 public key used by each web app for validating JWT token.
I'm wondering if there exists a way to set up a global Environment variable or ConfigMap or anything else in Openshift for these kind of common, shared settings per cluster such that they can be by default accessible for all web apps running in all PODs in the cluster? of coz, each individual Deployment Config should override these default values from the global settings at will.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-20 at 10:02Nothing built in. You could built that yourself with some webhooks and custom code. Otherwise you need to add the envFrom pointing at a Secret and/or ConfigMap to each pod template and copy that Secret/ConfigMap to all namespaces that needed it (kubed can help with that part at least).
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install airflags
Name as a first field with text type (representing flag name)
Environment fields as a Checkbox type (representing flag status in each environment)
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
