graphql-modules | Enterprise Grade Tooling For Your GraphQL Server | GraphQL library

 by   Urigo TypeScript Version: release-1679488576008 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | graphql-modules Summary

kandi X-RAY | graphql-modules Summary

graphql-modules is a TypeScript library typically used in Web Services, GraphQL, Webpack, Nodejs, Apollo applications. graphql-modules has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

GraphQL Modules is a toolset of libraries and guidelines dedicated to create reusable, maintainable, testable and extendable modules out of your GraphQL server.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              graphql-modules has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 1250 star(s) with 107 fork(s). There are 25 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 28 open issues and 271 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 68 days. There are 25 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of graphql-modules is release-1679488576008

            kandi-Quality Quality

              graphql-modules has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              graphql-modules has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              graphql-modules is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              graphql-modules releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of graphql-modules
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            graphql-modules Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for graphql-modules.

            graphql-modules Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for graphql-modules.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            How to use custom directives graphql-modules with apollo
            Asked 2021-Apr-24 at 11:07

            I need help with custom directives when using graphql-modules library. Have no idea where to place my custom directives so it is combined with overall schema

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-24 at 11:07

            I would like to post answer from Discord community, from user Maapteh.

            here it the quote from him

            in our app with old version we had everything in common module. We kept that approach partly when using the latest version of modules. See some parts of our codebase:

            import { ApolloServer, SchemaDirectiveVisitor } from 'apollo-server-express';

            const schema = AppModule.createSchemaForApollo();

            SchemaDirectiveVisitor.visitSchemaDirectives(schema, { isMember: IsMemberDirective, deprecated: isDeprecated, ...SNIP... });

            as you can see we create the schema we pass eventually to the apollo server (example using apollo). We add our generic directives like so. The schema for them is in our common module. Read further...

            For common scalars we added a common module. With their schema (so in schema directory we also have the directives schemas) and their resolver.

            const typeDefsArray = loadFilesSync(${__dirname}/schema/*.graphql, { useRequire: true, }); const typeDefs = mergeTypeDefs(typeDefsArray, { useSchemaDefinition: false });

            const resolverFunctions = { ImageUrl: ImageUrlType, PageSize: PageSizeType, Date: DateResolver, ...SNIP... };

            export const CommonModule = createModule({ id: 'common', typeDefs: typeDefs, resolvers: resolverFunctions, });

            hope it helps you

            https://discord.com/channels/625400653321076807/631489837416841253/832595211166548049

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66741736

            QUESTION

            graphql-modules not calling __resolveType
            Asked 2020-Apr-14 at 07:23

            I'm not entirely sure about the purpose / action of __resolveType function on an interface / union, but I suppose it's adding a __typename field with the resolved type. However, I cannot seem to get this working with graphql-modules. Here as subset, but sufficient subset of my schema.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Apr-14 at 07:23

            I'm having the same issue, can confirm that it appears __resolveType is never called when using graphql-modules. I'm going to raise an issue in the repo and reference this SO. Will post back any answer I get.

            It has already been reported in the repo issues and the fix was to pass the toplevel module schema to apollo-server, not as modules

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56879050

            QUESTION

            Apollo federation for small projects
            Asked 2020-Apr-09 at 00:59

            I am new to graphQL, Apollo etc. Soon I will be working on a low-cost app with 3 (rest-api) datasources and only 1 consumer to create (mainly) a User Type. It's planned to use serverless functions as hosting. I've been reading on schema stitching, federation and modules, but can't find a good answer on why I should use Apollo federation in this small project. As I understand it, you need multiple apollo-servers and will have a higher deploy/serverless cost because of it compared to a monolithic Apollo-server.

            A simplified example:

            Server 1:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Apr-09 at 00:59

            If you just have a single User schema, its not a good idea to use apollo federation. Single Apollo server would suffice. You can have a single server talking to multiple data sources. Apollo federation is basically a new version of stitching. (Stitching is deprecated) Both schema stitching and Apollo federation are for micro services.

            For an example, if you were building an e-commerce backend. You could have a server working on User type related queries and mutations(login, signup, user info etc.). You would have other services for order, products, stocks etc.

            In general, one domain(schema) per service.

            About extending types, the example you have shown is not ideal. lastname and email should probably be declared in the user service.

            You would extend User type in one of the following scenarios:

            1. If you are referencing User type in another schema, for example

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61049877

            QUESTION

            What are the benefits of Apollo Federation over a local modularization library like GraphQL Modules?
            Asked 2019-Dec-16 at 22:06

            When implementing a GraphQL solution it is often advantageous to modularize aspects of the graph to simplify the understanding, implementation, and testing of the complete graph. Apollo, a popular GraphQL solution vender, provides Apollo Federation as a solution to this problem, deprecating "stitching" solutions. Other solutions, such as GraphQL Modules, implement this sort of behavior on a local server level. GraphQL Modules even integrates with Apollo Federation, and they are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

            It would be really helpful to have some guidelines that indicate why you would need to federate your GraphQL implementation over multiple servers. It adds a lot of complexity. At what point does Apollo Federation make sense over a local module solution like GraphQL Modules. Why would you consider utilizing both?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Dec-16 at 21:19

            Both of them also allow to divide a GraphQL schema into different smaller schemas and then combine them after that. But one of the main differences is that GraphQL Module only works in the single server while Apollo Federation can work across different servers.

            So , suppose you divide a schema into 3 modules (User,Product and Review) as follows :

            GraphQL Module only allows all modules are implemented at the same server . It provides a opinionated ways to guide you separate each modules configuration such as its schema and resolver into their own code packages only.

            On the other hand , Apollo Federation allows these 3 modules to be implemented on separates servers/microservices and allow you to combine them as a single GraphQL server declaratively.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59362353

            QUESTION

            Mongoose Nested Array $push
            Asked 2018-May-21 at 10:49

            I am trying to $push an Object into a nested array, however it doesn't seem to be working. I am not sure what I am doing wrong.

            My database is like this:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-May-21 at 10:49

            What you missed in your attempts is that arrayFilters entries do not "autocast" like other properties in mongoose operations based on what value the "schema" has. This is because there is nothing there which actually ties the condition to a specific detail in the defined schema, or at least as far as the current mongoose release processes it.

            Therefore if you match to an _id within arrayFilters, you need to actually "cast" the ObjectId value yourself where the source comes from a "string":

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50441009

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install graphql-modules

            To install graphql-modules, use the following:. We are also publishing a pre-release version to NPM on each change. Just take a look at the build status on Github Actions and find "Publish Canary" job to get the published version.

            Support

            Documentation is available at graphql-modules.com.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries

            Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Consider Popular GraphQL Libraries

            parse-server

            by parse-community

            graphql-js

            by graphql

            apollo-client

            by apollographql

            relay

            by facebook

            graphql-spec

            by graphql

            Try Top Libraries by Urigo

            graphql-mesh

            by UrigoTypeScript

            graphql-cli

            by UrigoTypeScript

            graphql-scalars

            by UrigoTypeScript

            SOFA

            by UrigoTypeScript

            WhatsApp-Clone-Client-React

            by UrigoTypeScript