transpiler | ABAP to JS transpiler & runtime | Transpiler library

Consider this code:

Excuse any mistakes in my code, I'm still learning C++ syntax. My question is not about whether the code is correct but whether a literal expression will be optimized away.

Let's say I have a function generated from a non-type template like this:

I'm writing a (my own language) to C++ transpiler. I'd like to be able to offer a kind of virtual sub function that is transpiled into being part of the C++ code in the same scope in which it is called.

Here is an example of the type of C++ code I'd want to generate:

I want to use the BasisTranslator in Qiskit to process my circuit to base gates.

One of the constructor parameters for BasisTranslator is EquivalenceLibrary. I attempted creating a parameter-less EquivalenceLibrary() and pass it to a BasisTranslator, but the code fails, saying it cannot translate gates like MCT or CCX into the default basis.

I've got a bit of a code that works fine as an arrow function, but using wkhtmltopdf converting a webpage to an image, it's unable to read arrow functions. That said, I've tried numerous times to make this function without the arrow, but no success yet.

The 'related' answers do not answer my question. I simply can't get this function to return the same data when I remove the arrow for this async function.

Babel transpiler seems unable to do this, as well.

I am looking to make use of the native import/export that comes with ES6.

I am using Serverless Containers within AWS Lambda.

I have my Dockerfile which looks like this:

Use-case: This allows to differ whether the user have used promise-based style or callback style thus I can avoid double computations. I monkey-patch both function and that on-completed setter with ES6 Proxy and now I'm doing expensive computations in both. I want to avoid that. There's no way knowing whether website have used the Promise-based version or callback-version because by the time website call promise based version, the on-completed setter is empty.

The native function in question didn't had promise based version in the past.

I can't use Static Analysis because I'm monkey patching native functions websites use (whose code not under my control)

I have a small, browser-based game that I'm trying to get Jest up and running with.

My goal is to be able to write tests, and to have them run with Jest, and not to have any extra DOM- or browser API-related error messages.

As the game makes use of DOM and canvas, I need a solution where I can either mock those manually, or have Jest take care of it for me. At a minimum, I'd like to verify that the 'data model' and my logic is sane.

I'm also making use of ES6 modules.

Here's what I've tried so far:

1. Tried running jest:

I have a project in which I want to use classes generated by ANTLR4 in a piece of Kotlin code.

In pom.xml, ANTLR4 is configured as follows.