adapters | next-auth adapters that are maintained by the community | Authentication library

You should include your package.json in your final Docker image.

Edit: Also I'm not sure you should use .svelte-kit/build since this is an intermediate result used by sveltekit internally. You should have a build folder after running build task but I'm not sure cause I never used auto adapter, I usually use node adapter.

Mine basically looks like this:

Can I suggest not using Selenium, there is a backend api that serves the data for each page. The only tricky thing is that requests to the api need to have a certain uuid hash which is in the HTML of the landing page. So you can get that when you go to the landing page, then use it to sign your subsequent api calls, here is an example which will loop through the pages and images for each post:

Try to change the MainViewPagerAdapter class declaration like this

This is a issue people have been facing up for a while , and people suggested to read the documentation provided by Microsoft on the following issue . "Btw , I don't know whether they are the same issues or not but the error thrown back the code are same, that's why I have attached a link for the same!!"

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/537493/binding-winsock-shortly-after-boot-results-in-erro.html

This sounds like you're on an old version of @sveltejs/adapter-netlify that is incompatible with the latest version of SvelteKit. Try running the following to update to the latest versions of everything:

you can run command: pip install pygame

First, there is actually a list of use cases for the motivation of the initial introduction of Result, if you find it interesting. Also in the same document:

The Result class is designed to capture generic failures of Kotlin functions for their latter processing and should be used in general-purpose API like futures, etc, that deal with invocation of Kotlin code blocks and must be able to represent both a successful and a failed result of execution. The Result class is not designed to represent domain-specific error conditions.

Most of what follows is my personal opinion. It's built from facts, but is still just an opinion, so take it with a grain of salt.

Note that runCatching catches all sorts of Throwable, including JVM errors like OutOfMemoryError, NoClassDefFoundError or StackOverflowError. IMO it is bad practice to use catch-all mechanisms like this unless you're implementing some kind of framework that needs to report errors in a different way (for instance Kotlinx Coroutines).

Apart from JVM errors, I believe exceptions due to programming errors shouldn't really be handled in a way that bloats the business code either (by this, I mean that result types are not very appropriate in this case). Using error(), check(), require() in the right places will make use of exceptions that often don't make sense to catch in business code (IllegalStateException, IllegalArgumentException). Again, maybe it could be relevant to catch them in framework code.

If you really need to express "I want to catch any exception for this piece of code in case there is a bug so I can still do that other thing", then it would make sense to use a try-catch(e: Exception) for this, but it shouldn't catch Throwable, so still no runCatching here.

That leaves business errors for result-like types. By business errors, I mean things like missing entities, unknown values from external systems, bad user input, etc. However, I usually find better ways to model them than using kotlin.Result (it's not meant for this, as the design document stipulates). Modelling the absence of value is usually easy enough with a nullable type fun find(username: String): User?. Modelling a set of outcomes can be done with a custom sealed class that cover different cases, like a result type but with specific error subtypes (and more interesting business data about the error than just Throwable).

So in short, in the end, I never use kotlin.Result myself in business code (I could consider it for generic framework code that needs to report all errors).

My adapters and services return a Result. Failures and stacktraces are logged but do nothing else

A side note on that. As you can see, you're logging errors in the service itself, but it's unclear from the service consumer's perspective. The consumer receives a Result, so who's reponsible with dealing with the error here? If it's a recoverable error then it may or may not be appropriate to log it as an error, and maybe it's better as a warning or not at all. Maybe the consumer knows better the severity of the problem than the service. Also, the service makes no difference between JVM errors, programming errors (IAE, ISE, etc.), and business errors in the way it logs them.

You can use https://github.com/calogica/dbt-expectations#expect_column_values_to_be_of_type

Or look at their implementation at https://github.com/calogica/dbt-expectations/blob/main/macros/schema_tests/column_values_basic/expect_column_values_to_be_in_type_list.sql for ideas of your custom implementation.

client.voice.adapters maps guild ids to voice adapters. It returns a Map and Maps have a size property that returns the number of elements in that Map.

Would this work?