deducer | effective solution for deducing/transforming/reshaping data | Dataset library
kandi X-RAY | deducer Summary
kandi X-RAY | deducer Summary
This project is aimed at providing a simple but effective solution for deducing/transforming/reshaping data. A deduction is described as the following signature { source: Path, desstination?: Path, reducers?: Function[]], The deduce function will take an input object and an array of deductions, each deduction will be responsible for cosuming parts of the input in order to produce a new value in the output.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of deducer
deducer Key Features
deducer Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on deducer
QUESTION
I know that templatized types such as the below cost nothing on the compiled binary size:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-06 at 14:10This depends entirely on:
- How much the compiler feels like optimizing the variable away.
- How you use the variable.
Consider the code you posted. You created a constexpr
array. As this is an array, it is 100% legal to index it with a runtime value. This would require the compiler to emit code that accesses the array at that index, which would require that array to actually exist in memory. So if you use it in such a way, it must have storage.
However, since your code only indexes this array with a constant expression index, a compiler that wants to think a bit more than -O0
would allow would realize that it knows the value of all of the elements in that array. So it knows exactly what cArr[0]
is. And that means the compiler can just convert that expression into the proper value and just ignore that cArr
exists.
Such a compiler could do the same with arr
, BTW; it doesn't have to be a constant expression for the compiler to detect a no-op.
Also, note that since both arrays are non-static, neither will take up storage "in the compiled binary". If runtime storage for them is needed, it will be stack space, not executable space.
Broadly speaking, a constexpr
variable will take up storage at any reasonable optimization level if you do something that requires it to take up storage. This could be something as innocuous as passing it to a (un-inlined) function that takes the parameter by const&
.
QUESTION
I would like to use a dataframe of census data of several countries and make a contingency table with row/column/total percentages out of it. The thing I am struggling with is that the data is already aggregated in the form of a contingency table. How do I convert the raw counts into a contingency table?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-31 at 20:56An option would be to split
the dataset by 'country', create a summary table with xtabs
and apply the prop.table
QUESTION
Minimized example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-07 at 11:30As per this:
Type deduction does not consider implicit conversions (other than type adjustments listed above): that's the job for overload resolution, which happens later.
You can try having something like this:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install deducer
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page