charlie | TypeScript based Forth-like VM w | Interpreter library

I found the answer too this.

In order to do this I ended up using the wtforms_json from json methodas below:

At the end of the intro of the documentation, it is mentioned that the implementation relies on a C++ implementation of SwissTables. This page contains illustrations about two variants: « flat » and « node » based.

The main difference between these two variants is pointer stability. In the « node » based version, the key-value pairs, once inserted, keep their address in memory even if the hash is reorganised. In the « flat » version, some insertions/removals can make the previous key-value pairs be moved in memory.

When it comes to the Rust implementation, I am not experienced enough to be certain of any specific detail, but I tried this simple example based on yours.

Utilizing the package documentation The best I could do was force all columns to the right. It may also depend on your YAML settings. What output are you rendering to? I may have had different results since I am using html_document

BEFORE:

AFTER:

with the package you specify your table body style, and then map it inside your ggtexttable() function.

tbody.style = tbody_style(hjust=1, x=0.9)

This is my reproducible solution

You appear to be using Db2-v11 for Z/OS "DSN11015" in V11 compatibility mode.

This version lacks the scalar function HASH_SHA256 (and others) which is present in Db2-v12 for z/OS. That is the reason you get sqlcode -440 (no such function HASH...) with your Db2-for-z/os version.

At Version-11 , IBM documents a function ENCRYPT_TDES which may help you.

Background information on using this function.

You can write your own functions if you have the skills.

You can use the .join string method instead of replace.

Instead of: stringcodetwo=str(stringcode).replace(" ", "")

Do: stringcodetwo="".join(stringcode)

You allocated a SortedList object in main() which allocated memory and never freed it.

The other blocks belong to the std::string objects inside the list. They are only lost because the list holding them lost track of them.

When doing your analysis, don't worry about the 6 indirectly lost blocks, focus on the one directly lost one.

Almost certainly this is a violation of the "Rule of Five". Your SortedList does an allocation in its constructor and doesn't properly manage that allocation in its move-assignment operator.

Looking at your code in the copy assignment operator, this line is causing the leak

getContents returns not a String as you apparently expect, but IO String, which is a "program", which, when executed, will produce a String. So when you're trying to parse this program with decode, of course that doesn't work: decode parses a String, it cannot parse a program.

So how do you execute this program to obtain the String? There are two ways: either you make it part of another program or you call it main and it becomes your entry point.

In your case, the sensible thing to do would be to make getContent part of your main program. To do that, use the left arrow <-, like this:

Assuming the column Index is actually the index of the frame use apply pd.Series :

Use when-otherwise to populate values conditionally-