unbuild | 📦 An unified javascript build system | Build Tool library
kandi X-RAY | unbuild Summary
kandi X-RAY | unbuild Summary
A unified javascript build system. Robust rollup based bundler that supports typescript and generates commonjs and module formats + type declarations. Integration with mkdist for generating bundleless dists with file-to-file transpilation. Stub dist once using jiti and you can try and link your project without needing to watch and rebuild during development. Automatically check for potential missing and unused dependencies. Also you can check output size and exports quickly in CLI output.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of unbuild
unbuild Key Features
unbuild Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on unbuild
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-06 at 15:15There is multiple issues on your recipe:
- Your
do_compile
command does not indicate where to find your .c file - You should use
${CC}
instead of$(CC)
lpthread
does not end with ands
QUESTION
cabal-version: 3.4
name: SudokuSolver
version: 0.1.0.0
build-type: Simple
library sud
build-depends:
base
, text
hs-source-dirs: lib
exposed-modules: Sud.Rdg
default-language: Haskell2010
executable suSol
default-language: Haskell2010
hs-source-dirs: app
main-is: Main.hs
build-depends:
base
, optparse-applicative
, filepath
, text
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-22 at 11:09When you add a name to a library that means it is an private or internal library of your package. It seems that cabal currently has a bug which causes that confusing error message asking you to add SudokuSolver
to your build-depends of your executable, you could instead add SudokuSolver:sud
.
However, it is much more common too keep the library unnamed (or give it the same name as the package), which makes it the main public library. Then the name of the library is the same as the name of the package so you should really add SudokuSolver
to the build-depends of your executable. This was the only possible option for a long time, internal libraries are relatively new. That is probably also why there are still a few issues like this.
I also notice that you can add sud
as Willem van Onsem says, but only if you use cabal-version: 3.0
or earlier. With cabal-version: 3.4
you have to use the SudokuSolver:sud
(package-name:internal-library-name) notation.
Edit: I have opened an issue on the cabal GitHub repo.
QUESTION
From meta-raspberrypi I am using the rpi-hwup-image.bb recipe to build the image in which I have appended raspi-gpio_git recipe, but i am reciving the following error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-21 at 21:38_git is the version, just use raspi-gpio.
QUESTION
I'm building a yocto project which uses cppzmq
(http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/123508/)
The strange thing is that when I build it directly
bitbake cppzmq
it builds successfully.
But when I include it in my image
IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " cppzmq"
there is an error:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-09 at 08:43It is important to distinguish between the recipe name cppzmq
and the provided packages of the recipe. A single recipe can provide several packages (,
-dev
, -staticdev
etc.).
With IMAGE_INSTALL
you define which packages are included in the image.
Looking at the cppzmq recipe you can see that it only provides PACKAGES = "${PN}-dev"
.
Hence you should use IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " cppzmq-dev"
QUESTION
Is there a way to block creating/approving merge requests from "feature/*" branches into master? I need to allow only merge requests from "release/*" and "hotfix/*" branches.
When creating MergeRequest via GUI the default target branch is master. So human error while doing this may break a workflow and merge untested\unbuild feature into master.
Our current workflow is coding new features in "feature/*" branches. Merging several features into new "release/*" branch and CI makes a build and tests of this release. After testing this release goes on the prod server and into master.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-13 at 15:05Since GitLab permissions are role-based, there's no way to set permissions per branch (other than setting a branch as protected in Settings / Repository / Protected Branches
, which which controls who can merge not which branch can merge ). However, you could do the following:
- In your GitLab CICD (if you don't have it set up already I highly recommend, its a handy tool) set up a check that runs always to determine which branch is trying to be merged ($CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME is what you want, see all GitLab default environment variables here) and if the branch name matches 'feature/*', then have the pipeline fail
- Under
Settings / General / Merge Requests
, underMerge Checks
, check the optionPipelines must succeed
.
Now, if someone attempts to create a Merge Request from a feature branch, the pipeline will fail and no one will be allowed to approve the Merge Request.
QUESTION
My unbuild node.js project is on a file server and I want to execute the npm script "build" which should build the application. But I can't find a way to call this command through code. Does anyone know if this should be possible? When I try to search for a result I keep finding tutorials on how npm script work, which is not what I want to know. Is it possble to run an npm script (command?) from code?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-07 at 13:42you can use concurrently npm package, it allow managing your npm scripts and provides API to call npm-scripts from inside your Node app project, check programmatic-usage section.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install unbuild
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page