async-sema | Semaphore using `async` and `await` | Reactive Programming library
kandi X-RAY | async-sema Summary
kandi X-RAY | async-sema Summary
Semaphore using `async` and `await`
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of async-sema
async-sema Key Features
async-sema Examples and Code Snippets
[-e][-f][-c][-g][-shiny].png
const axios = require('axios')
const { Sema } = require('async-sema')
const sema = new Sema(1)
const availablePokemon = {}
function resolvePokemonIcon(availablePokemon, pokemonId, form = 0, evolution = 0, gender = 0, c
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on async-sema
QUESTION
One of the less-talked-about features of C#7 is "generalized async return types", which is described by Microsoft as:
Returning a Task object from async methods can introduce performance bottlenecks in certain paths. Task is a reference type, so using it means allocating an object. In cases where a method declared with the async modifier returns a cached result, or completes synchronously, the extra allocations can become a significant time cost in performance critical sections of code. It can become very costly if those allocations occur in tight loops.
The new language feature means that async methods may return other types in addition to Task
, Task
and void
. The returned type must still satisfy the async pattern, meaning a GetAwaiter method must be accessible. As one concrete example, the ValueTask type has been added to the .NET framework to make use of this new language feature:
That sounds great, but I cannot for the life of my find any example that doesn't just use the stock ValueTask
type. I want to make my own Task-like type. Specifically I want a type that behaves like a Task
, but with a more functional style of error handling.
Here is the type I am using for functional error handling in my project:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Aug-29 at 18:29I couldn't find any good tutorial yet. But you can look at the compiler unittests which create such task-like types (look for "[AsyncMethodBuilder").
The starting point is to create a type and mark it as task-like with an attribute like [AsyncMethodBuilder(typeof(MyTaskBuilder))]
.
Then you need to define your own MyTaskBuilder
type. It must implement a certain pattern (see below). That is the same pattern implemented by the regular AsyncMethodBuilder
type which supports regular Task
.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install async-sema
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page