local-history | local-history for vscode

by zabel-xyz TypeScript Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | local-history Summary

local-history is a TypeScript library typically used in Utilities, Electron, Visual Studio Code applications. local-history has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

A visual source code plugin for maintaining local history of files. Every time you modify a file, a copy of the old contents is kept in the local history. At any time, you can compare a file with any older version from the history. It can help you out when you change or delete a file by accident. The history can also help you out when your workspace has a catastrophic problem. Each file revision is stored in a separate file inside the .history folder of your workspace directory (you can also configure another location, see local-history.path). e.g., .history/foo/bar/myFile_20151212205930.ts. You can easily navigate between history files with the local-history tree in the explorer pane. When you click on a file, a comparaison with the current version is displayed. You can also access other commands via a context menu.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

local-history has a low active ecosystem.

It has 205 star(s) with 32 fork(s). There are 6 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 57 open issues and 75 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 210 days. There are 6 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of local-history is current.

Quality

local-history has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

local-history has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

local-history code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

local-history is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

local-history releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of local-history

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

local-history Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for local-history.

local-history Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for local-history.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on local-history

Should I migrate local history when switching to Git LFS after hundreds of commits?

QUESTION

Should I migrate local history when switching to Git LFS after hundreds of commits?

Asked 2022-Mar-27 at 09:55

I have a git repository (a Godot game project using GDScript) that I've been working on for quite a while and has about a thousand commits, pushed to GitHub.

I'm to start adding binary assets like image or sound files with Git LFS.

Looking at the git-lfs-migrate docs I should probably migrate the local history to have some already existing png files converted too. Now, this looks like a significant change and I don't insist on shooting myself in the foot, so I'd like to know what is the best practice for this type of repository migration.

I'm the only one working on this repository so even sacrileges like force pushing is acceptable to me, as long as I don't lose my code and can convert my large files.

Clarification: Primarily I'm unsure about the possible consequences of migrating the local history or going without rewriting local history. Not sure what's the pros and cons are for these choices.

The reason why I'm considering Git LFS is that so far I've only been editing text files, but now I'm about to add a number of large binaries (images, sounds, data files), which will change during development, so not using LFS would be a waste. Ideally I'd only like to download the latest binaries when I'm cloning the repository to my various test environments.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Mar-27 at 09:55

Finally I did not migrate anything, just installed git-lfs, then pushed the changes to the remote repository on GitHub. When I cloned the repository on my 2 other computers (a Linux and a Mac), not forgetting to install git-lfs there too, on both cases I received a weird error, complaining about "smudge filter lfs failed".

This SO answer was the solution: https://stackoverflow.com/a/48882513/63377

Essentially LFS didn't have a URL set and it was too timid to tell me. I had to run git config lfs.url $(git config remote.WHATEVER-MY-LFS-REMOTE-NAME-IS.url), then do another git pull, and it all seems to be working.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71622977

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install local-history

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: