fooling | Code base for Deep Neural Networks | Machine Learning library

I eventually figured out how to do it after a good night of sleep, here is a working version that uses the B1-Motion and ButtonRelease events instead of updating everytime one slider is moved because it would execute the command twice by just moving one slider. This led to the value being used for the calculation not being the current one because of how things are processed.

I went back to the page I took the screenshot from. On the first ("Amazon Fire Tablets and Phones") and the last ("Non-Amazon Devices") tab all the little question marks show a "Targeted by another APK in the current version." hint. I'll need to research that more because it sounds nonsensical. The "Amazon Fire TV" tab's hints show some minSdkVersion (for very old devices) and also "android.hardware.touchscreen" capability hint. My game needs touch screen, so that's not surprising and the old APK wasn't supporting those either.

Reading more about the Targeted by another APK in the current version. hint I came across https://developer.amazon.com/docs/app-submission/publish-app-upload-apk-files.html#add_multiple_apks "With the second APK, you can select support for devices not already selected by the first APK.". I'm not sure why the store is not able to serve automatically the more recent APK and why I have to manually toggle things, but well, that's what I'll do.

1. Starting edit:
2. Turning off devices for the old APK
3. Turing off on the other tab for the old APK:
4. Editing and turning on devices for the newer APK. Maybe this is why there's this weird thing going on, I have to decrease minSdk back from 23 to 22 to have a better coverage:

So the GET_ACCOUTNS or USE_CREDENTIALS is not a problem supposedly (so far). If the above doesn't help to you then also check out https://developer.amazon.com/docs/app-submission/troubleshooting-android-manifest-and-device-targeting.html

Cases 1, 2, 3 are all the same "corrupting the stack" - undefined behavior, as the Standard would put it. The problem is that you can never know what is the content of some address, which means that when your program starts executing you do not know what's the value in some variable. Since a pointer holds an address (that's technically incorrect if you're pedantic about the standard, but let's make things simple here), it does point somewhere and anything can happen when you dereference it. So don't do it.

Case 4 is when you get more memory from the heap (read links posted). malloc will return a memory address to your pointer, typically an address in the heap (which will grow with calls to sbrk(2) system call).

DISCLAIMER: nothing below is a derivation of the standard, nor tries to be. On the contrary. Everything here is the product of tinkering and reading about computer architecture and internals (both books and source codes). But mostly tinkering - there's no better way to learn the gritty details then tinkering.

Now, of course there's undefined behavior. But computers are crazy things, programming is even crazier, so surely there's something down the rabbit hole - as you've guessed. There's the Standard and there's undefined behavior. And there's the real world, where variables live in memory, there are these things called stack-frames, instruction pointers, curiosity and tinkering.

• Explain the concept of a stack frame in a nutshell
• The Stack Frame
• Instruction Pointer (IP) or Program Counter (PC)
• What and where are the stack and heap?

There's also a lot of dependency on implementation of hardware, operating system, compiler, assemblers, linkers, loaders and a lot of other things. With all that said, let's go back in time to the 60's or 70's, where computer architecture was simple to understand and there were no people that liked standards.

In simple terms, when a program starts an instruction at a specific location is executed. Then, some code put there by compiler/assembler/linker will set up the running "environment" and call your main function. But before it does, it saves the contents of it's registers in memory, in the stack (this is the program's context, so to speak) - the saving is done by pushing the contents of registers in the stack. Very important to this is the instruction pointer, which contains the address of the next instruction to be executed when the main function returns.

When all of mains instructions are executed and you call that return, the computer pops the contents of the memory in reverse order, into the registers.

So, imagine this:

Handler is not an issue here its the Runnable. you are using and posting same Runnable each time thats why its getting piled up . You can not remove the previous call because you do not have a Tag or token to this delayed call . take a look at some of Handler's method like sendMessageDelayed these might help .

After giving it some thought i think you can move the Auto scroll part to SnapHelper. Not a full prove solution but i think it will work. You might have to put few checks in SnapHelper . Give it a try and let me know . i haven't tested it.

At a total guess, this?

subqueries are not required. This query will get you min and max by article and dealer

try:

Since Map instance is an iterator, you can cycle through it and keep track of how many items you want to print:

You're looking for Reflect.isFunction().