libf | C as a Pure Functional Programming Language | Functional Programming library

 by   GJDuck C++ Version: v0.2a License: Non-SPDX

kandi X-RAY | libf Summary

kandi X-RAY | libf Summary

libf is a C++ library typically used in Programming Style, Functional Programming applications. libf has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However libf has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

LibF is a library that supports pure functional programming in C++.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              libf has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 169 star(s) with 16 fork(s). There are 11 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 2 open issues and 3 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 14 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of libf is v0.2a

            kandi-Quality Quality

              libf has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              libf has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              libf code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              libf has a Non-SPDX License.
              Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              libf releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              It has 395 lines of code, 0 functions and 1 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of libf
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            libf Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for libf.

            libf Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for libf.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Android Gradle plugin 7.0.0 and NDK: UnsatisfiedLinkError
            Asked 2022-Jan-15 at 09:35

            I recently updated Android Gradle Plugin to version 7.0.0 (Gradle version 7.0.2). Since I did this update, my native library continues to be compiled regularly, but no .so files are generated in my final apk.

            In fact, running the app the exception is thrown:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-14 at 13:11

            Had the same issue, gradle plugin version 7.0.2 fixed this

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68622756

            QUESTION

            external-downloader option not working as expected in youtube-dl
            Asked 2021-Mar-31 at 04:17

            I was trying to download specific timestamps from youtube using youtube-dl as mentioned as mentioned here in the comments

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Mar-31 at 04:17

            Your ffmpeg version is too old. You need at least v4.0.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66876561

            QUESTION

            How to link against libGL on OSX using cmake?
            Asked 2020-Sep-15 at 22:11

            I'm trying to compile camera_calibration on OSX 10.11 and after a few hurdles with a few X11 related dependencies I find myself still stuck with a few linking errors:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Sep-15 at 22:11

            On macOS do not(!) develop against X11 / GLX. They are not natively supported! The X11 server for macOS supports only indirect GLX with limited functionality. You will get only sub par performance. And CUDA (used by libvis) is not supported.

            On macOS all OpenGL development should use the native OpenGL framework: https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/GraphicsImaging/Conceptual/OpenGL-MacProgGuide/opengl_contexts/opengl_contexts.html

            However take note that OpenGL has been declared deprecated by Apple.

            In short: You'll at least have to modify your program to use the macOS OpenGL framework, or even bite the bullet and accept that macOS is not a well supported platform for your application.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63731301

            QUESTION

            Running apt-get install within Docker container: "Unable to connect to deb.debian.org" part-way through installing dependencies
            Asked 2020-Jun-20 at 13:58

            I'm trying to build a docker container on a Raspberry Pi 3B. I need to install gpac for MP4Box.

            Dockerfile

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jun-20 at 13:58

            It ended up being wifi issues. Switching to a wired connection fixed the issues I was having.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62480272

            QUESTION

            simple_read_from_buffer/simple_write_to_buffer vs. copy_to_user/copy_from_user
            Asked 2020-Jun-20 at 12:13

            I recently wrote a module implementing these functions.

            What is the difference between the two? From my understanding, the copy_..._user functions are more secure. Please correct me if I'm mistaken.

            Furthermore, is it a bad idea to mix the two functions in one program? For example, I used simple_read_from_buffer in my misc dev read function, and copy_from_user in my write function.

            Edit: I believe I've found the answer to my question from reading fs/libfs.c (I wasn't aware that this was where the source code was located for these functions); from my understanding the simple_...() functions are essentially a wrapper around the copy_...() functions. I think it was appropriate in my case to use copy_from_user for the misc device write function as I needed to validate that the input matched a specific string before returning it to the user buffer.

            I will still leave this question open though in case someone has a better explanation or wants to correct me!

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jun-20 at 12:13

            simple_read_from_buffer and simple_write_to_buffer are just convenience wrappers around copy_{to,from}_user for when all you need to do is service a read from userspace from a kernel buffer, or service a write from userspace to a kernel buffer.

            From my understanding, the copy_..._user functions are more secure.

            Neither version is "more secure" than the other. Whether or not one might be more secure than the other depends on the specific use case.

            I would say that simple_{read,write}_... can in general be more secure since they do all the appropriate checks for you before copying. If all you need to do is service a read/write to/from a kernel buffer, then using simple_{read,write}_... is surely faster and less error-prone than manually checking and calling copy_{from,to}_user.

            A good example where simple_read_from_buffer is useful would be:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62461312

            QUESTION

            Error while linking a custom dynamic library Rust
            Asked 2020-Jun-02 at 05:00

            In a directory I have a C file and its header

            /home/test/c_pro

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jun-01 at 16:33

            Compile your shared object with

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62127345

            QUESTION

            Difference between array of c_char inside and outside a structure in python for fortran library
            Asked 2020-Feb-10 at 14:34

            I'm interfacing a fortran library with python using c_types. I initialize structures in python, pass them to fortran who populates them, et read them back in python. Everything works fine with array of numbers but now I'm stuck with interfacing string arrays.

            I've tried example like this one and this was ok, but in this case the c_char array is not in a structure. So I've tried to modify the previous example putting the c_char array inside a structure. Here is the code I've used, with and without the structure:

            Python code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Feb-10 at 14:34

            Listing [Python 3.Docs]: ctypes - A foreign function library for Python.

            The cause it's a CTypes subtle behavior. c_char (and also c_wchar) arrays are silently converted to bytes (or str) when they are present as fields in a structure. This is being done via c_char_p (or c_wchar_p) which are NUL terminated, meaning that the "array" will be truncated if a NUL (0x00) char will be encountered, which is exactly your case. You can check that by looking at the field type.
            Don't know why this is (maybe to ease the usage), but there are cases when it does more harm than good. It can be reproduced with Python code only.

            code00.py

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60093054

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install libf

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            [LibF full documentation](https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~gregory/libf/doc/)[List functions](https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~gregory/libf/doc/list.html)[Map functions](https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~gregory/libf/doc/map.html)[Set functions](https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~gregory/libf/doc/set.html)[Vector functions](https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~gregory/libf/doc/vector.html)[String functions](https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~gregory/libf/doc/string.html)[Tuple functions](https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~gregory/libf/doc/tuple.html)[Maybe functions](https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~gregory/libf/doc/maybe.html)
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/GJDuck/libf.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone GJDuck/libf

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:GJDuck/libf.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Consider Popular Functional Programming Libraries

            ramda

            by ramda

            mostly-adequate-guide

            by MostlyAdequate

            scala

            by scala

            guides

            by thoughtbot

            fantasy-land

            by fantasyland

            Try Top Libraries by GJDuck

            e9patch

            by GJDuckC++

            e9afl

            by GJDuckC++

            LowFat

            by GJDuckC++

            GC

            by GJDuckC

            EffectiveSan

            by GJDuckC++