libf | C as a Pure Functional Programming Language | Functional Programming library
kandi X-RAY | libf Summary
kandi X-RAY | libf Summary
LibF is a library that supports pure functional programming in C++.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of libf
libf Key Features
libf Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on libf
QUESTION
I recently updated Android Gradle Plugin to version 7.0.0 (Gradle version 7.0.2). Since I did this update, my native library continues to be compiled regularly, but no .so files are generated in my final apk.
In fact, running the app the exception is thrown:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-14 at 13:11Had the same issue, gradle plugin version 7.0.2 fixed this
QUESTION
I was trying to download specific timestamps from youtube using youtube-dl
as mentioned as mentioned here in the comments
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-31 at 04:17Your ffmpeg version is too old. You need at least v4.0.
QUESTION
I'm trying to compile camera_calibration on OSX 10.11 and after a few hurdles with a few X11 related dependencies I find myself still stuck with a few linking errors:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-15 at 22:11On macOS do not(!) develop against X11 / GLX. They are not natively supported! The X11 server for macOS supports only indirect GLX with limited functionality. You will get only sub par performance. And CUDA (used by libvis) is not supported.
On macOS all OpenGL development should use the native OpenGL
framework: https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/GraphicsImaging/Conceptual/OpenGL-MacProgGuide/opengl_contexts/opengl_contexts.html
However take note that OpenGL has been declared deprecated by Apple.
In short: You'll at least have to modify your program to use the macOS OpenGL framework, or even bite the bullet and accept that macOS is not a well supported platform for your application.
QUESTION
I'm trying to build a docker container on a Raspberry Pi 3B. I need to install gpac
for MP4Box
.
Dockerfile
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-20 at 13:58It ended up being wifi issues. Switching to a wired connection fixed the issues I was having.
QUESTION
I recently wrote a module implementing these functions.
What is the difference between the two? From my understanding, the copy_..._user
functions are more secure. Please correct me if I'm mistaken.
Furthermore, is it a bad idea to mix the two functions in one program? For example, I used simple_read_from_buffer
in my misc dev read
function, and copy_from_user
in my write function.
Edit: I believe I've found the answer to my question from reading fs/libfs.c
(I wasn't aware that this was where the source code was located for these functions); from my understanding the simple_...()
functions are essentially a wrapper around the copy_...()
functions. I think it was appropriate in my case to use copy_from_user
for the misc device write function as I needed to validate that the input matched a specific string before returning it to the user buffer.
I will still leave this question open though in case someone has a better explanation or wants to correct me!
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-20 at 12:13simple_read_from_buffer
and simple_write_to_buffer
are just convenience wrappers around copy_{to,from}_user
for when all you need to do is service a read
from userspace from a kernel buffer, or service a write
from userspace to a kernel buffer.
From my understanding, the
copy_..._user
functions are more secure.
Neither version is "more secure" than the other. Whether or not one might be more secure than the other depends on the specific use case.
I would say that simple_{read,write}_...
can in general be more secure since they do all the appropriate checks for you before copying. If all you need to do is service a read/write to/from a kernel buffer, then using simple_{read,write}_...
is surely faster and less error-prone than manually checking and calling copy_{from,to}_user
.
A good example where simple_read_from_buffer
is useful would be:
QUESTION
In a directory I have a C file and its header
/home/test/c_pro
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-01 at 16:33Compile your shared object with
QUESTION
I'm interfacing a fortran library with python using c_types. I initialize structures in python, pass them to fortran who populates them, et read them back in python. Everything works fine with array of numbers but now I'm stuck with interfacing string arrays.
I've tried example like this one and this was ok, but in this case the c_char array is not in a structure. So I've tried to modify the previous example putting the c_char array inside a structure. Here is the code I've used, with and without the structure:
Python code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-10 at 14:34Listing [Python 3.Docs]: ctypes - A foreign function library for Python.
The cause it's a CTypes subtle behavior. c_char (and also c_wchar) arrays are silently converted to bytes (or str) when they are present as fields in a structure. This is being done via c_char_p (or c_wchar_p) which are NUL terminated, meaning that the "array" will be truncated if a NUL (0x00) char will be encountered, which is exactly your case. You can check that by looking at the field type.
Don't know why this is (maybe to ease the usage), but there are cases when it does more harm than good. It can be reproduced with Python code only.
code00.py
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install libf
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page