sysroot | Work in Progress may eat your cat | Machine Learning library

 by   UBERTC C++ Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | sysroot Summary

kandi X-RAY | sysroot Summary

sysroot is a C++ library typically used in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning applications. sysroot has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Work in Progress may eat your cat.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              sysroot has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 1 star(s) with 6 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              sysroot has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of sysroot is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              sysroot has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              sysroot has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              sysroot code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              sysroot does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              sysroot releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of sysroot
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            sysroot Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for sysroot.

            sysroot Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for sysroot.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            A consistent example for using the C++ API of Pyarrow
            Asked 2022-Mar-28 at 19:33

            I am trying to use the C++ API of Pyarrow. There is currently no example for it on the official documentation, and this is the best I am able to come up with for a simple thing:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-28 at 19:33

            First, the call to Py_Initialize() is superfluous. You are calling your code from within python and so, presumably, python has already been initialized. That would be needed if you were writing your own main and not a plugin-type library. Correspondingly, the call to Py_Finalize() is probably a bad idea.

            Second, and more significant for the error at hand, is that you are using ctypes.CDLL (and not, for example, ctypes.PyDLL) which states (emphasis mine):

            The returned function prototype creates functions that use the standard C calling convention. The function will release the GIL during the call. If use_errno is set to true, the ctypes private copy of the system errno variable is exchanged with the real errno value before and after the call; use_last_error does the same for the Windows error code.

            And, finally, the Arrow initialization routines assume you are holding the GIL (this should probably be added to the documentation). So the easiest way to fix your program is probably to change CDLL to PyDLL:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71642392

            QUESTION

            Converting Makefile to CMake cannot find linked shared object
            Asked 2022-Mar-23 at 15:37

            I am attempting to convert a working Makefile into a CMake and need a little assistance. I am trying to cross compile a small program for a yocto device from a Ubuntu20 machine that is trying to link to the devices shared object file with cmake. I have a working Makefile that builds a working program. However, when I try and do this with a CMakeList file it fails at the make stage linking to the shared objects linker flag.

            The file structure of the code is as follows;

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-29 at 23:37

            Thanks to Tsyvarev comment the solution was to remove the -lOBD2 from the target_link_options. As per Tsyvarev suggestion now all the linker options are linked through target_link_libraries.

            The solution to the CMakeLists.txt

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69357512

            QUESTION

            Problem with manually allocating memory address for a pointer
            Asked 2022-Feb-16 at 16:50

            I am trying to work with flash memory on MPC5748G - a microcontroller from NXP running FreeRTOS 10.0.1, and I get some behaviour that I can't understand.

            I am allocating memory manually, and the assignment seems not to work. However, I can reach the value at the address when using 'printf' - but only from the same function. (I'm using the copy of a pointer, to make sure that some sore of compiler optimisation doesn't take place)

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-16 at 16:50

            The problem was writing to FLASH memory - it hasn't been correctly initialized.

            The proper way to write to flash on MPC5748g using the SDK 3.0.3 is following:

            • save flash controller cache
            • initialise flash
            • check and protect UT block
            • unblock an address space
            • erase a block in this space
            • check if the space block is blank
            • program the block
            • verify if the block is programmed correctly
            • check sum of the programmed data
            • restore flash controller cache

            The strange behaviour of printf and pointer was due to compiler optimization. After changing the compiler flags to -O0 (no optimization), the error was consistent.

            The same consistent error can be achieved when marking the pointers as 'volatile'.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71069626

            QUESTION

            FFMPEG metadata not work with segment format
            Asked 2022-Feb-11 at 10:03

            I'm trying to add rotation metadata to the video recorded from RTSP stream. All works fine until I try to run recording with segment format. My command looks like this:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-11 at 10:03

            I found out it has been resolved in

            https://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commitdiff;h=a74428921f8bfb33cbe0340bfd810b6945e432d2#patch1

            and it works fine in ffmpeg 5.0. You can also apply this patch to 4.4.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71020015

            QUESTION

            QT on Raspberry Pi 4
            Asked 2022-Feb-10 at 09:59

            I have a Raspberry Pi 4 Model B Rev 1.4 and I am using Ubuntu 20.04 running in VirtualBox on a Windows 10 machine.

            I have been following the steps presented in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmtN3Rmx9Rk&list=PLXAxzIhirYJGp1dMN0SxMRNCumubmpzWj&index=2&t=1686s. The goal is to run QT C++ applications on the Raspberry Pi

            @24.20, the presenter issues the command:

            rsync -avz --rsync-path="sudo rsync" pi@192.168.1.237:/lib sysroot

            His host machine receives a number of files. On the video I can see the contents of lib/firmware, lib/modules.bak, lib/modules, lib/udev

            However, when I issue the same command, I only receive a symbolic link

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-10 at 09:59

            Had the same problem. the /lib you want to copy is a link, not a folder. It's linked to /usr/lib. So try it with

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70689073

            QUESTION

            SPheno-4.0.5 make command not running (MacOS)
            Asked 2022-Jan-19 at 13:49

            In my work I am using a Fortran based program called SPheno. Having SPheno-4.0.4 installed, I tried to install the new version SPheno-4.0.5, however, when selecting F90 = gfortran in the Makefile, just as I did on my working SPheno-4.0.4 version, it returns me the following error:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-09 at 14:43

            The output means that make invoked this command:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69505997

            QUESTION

            How to make conda use its own gcc version?
            Asked 2021-Dec-12 at 16:12

            I am trying to run the training of stylegan2-pytorch on a remote system. The remote system has gcc (9.3.0) installed on it. I'm using conda env that has the following installed (cudatoolkit=10.2, torch=1.5.0+, and ninja=1.8.2, gcc_linux-64=7.5.0). I encounter the following error:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-12 at 16:12

            Just to share, not sure it will help you. However it shows that in standard conditions it is possible to use the conda gcc as described in the documentation instead of the system gcc.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70316504

            QUESTION

            version `GLIBC_2.32' not found error when running petalinux-build
            Asked 2021-Dec-04 at 21:55

            I'm trying to build PetaLinux image as described here: tutorial. To build it I'm using Fedora 33, which is not officially supported but usually there are workarounds. I'm having problems with the command petalinux-build (step 3), after some computation it prints a quite long log on the terminal, stating in particular that:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-04 at 21:55

            /home/MY_USER/.../sysroots-uninative/x86_64-linux/lib/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.32' not found (required by /lib64/libgomp.so.1)

            You are mixing system libgomp.so.1 with sysroot libc.so.6 -- this will never end well. You probably need to build libgomp.so.1 in the sysroot as well.

            And if I run /lib/libc.so.6, I get:

            That is irrelevant -- you link isn't failing with that library, but with the sysroot one.

            If you run /home/MY_USER/path/Project/xilinx-zc702-2018.2/build/tmp/sysroots-uninative/x86_64-linux/lib/libc.so.6, you'll see that it is in fact too old (older than 2.32).

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70226526

            QUESTION

            Wrong runtime linker/interpreter set for 32-bit armhf when cross-compiling
            Asked 2021-Dec-03 at 13:53

            I am utilizing yocto (dunfell) to cross-compile a project for multiple different architectures. Specifically, the targets I have are a 64-bit RaspberryPi4 (aarch64) and a 32-bit Orange Pi (armhf). My project that I am cross-compiling compiles and runs without issue when building for the raspi target; the runtime linker is properly set and things run without issue. However, whenever I build for the Orange Pi target, the program appears to compile without issue, but when I try to execute it on the platform, I get a "File not found" error.

            This appears to be because the interpreter (runtime linker) is set to /usr/lib/ld.so which is not actually on the system. See below:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-03 at 13:53

            After a few days of debugging, I figured out there problem. If anyone with more knowledge than I on linking would like to chime in to add things, please do. Ultimately, this was resolved by using gcc as the linker as opposed to using ld (the ones provided by yocto's cross compiler; i.e. aarch64-poky-linux-gcc).

            In order to do this, I modified my recipe to pass in LD=${CC} LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS} to my Makefile. Now, it builds and executes properly for both the RPi and OrangePi targets.

            I believe this is mainly the case because the LDFLAGS provided by yocto actually can't be parsed by ld. From my research, it looks like ld is typically invoked by gcc. However, the flags still need to get to the complier. So, originally, LDFLAGS that needed to be passed into linking, weren't being passed in at all because I just assumed there was an error with doing it that way. So, be sure you're passing your LDFLAGS that yocto gives you into gcc.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70114678

            QUESTION

            "Multiple definition of" "first defined here" on GCC 10.2.1 but not GCC 8.3.0
            Asked 2021-Nov-10 at 21:14

            I've had a bit of a look around Stackoverflow and the wider Internet and identified that the most common causes for this error are conflation of declaration (int var = 1;) and definition (int var;), and including .c files from .h files.

            My small project I just split from one file into several is not doing any of these things. I'm very confused.

            I made a copy of the project and deleted all the code in the copy (which was fun) until I reached here:

            main.c ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-10 at 21:14

            Yes there was a change in behaviour.

            In C you are supposed to only define a global variable in one translation unit, other translation unit that want to access the variable should declare it as "extern".

            In your code, a.h is included in both a.c and main.c so the variable is defined twice. To fix this you should change the "int test" in a.h to "extern int test", then add "int test" to a.c to define the variable exactly once.

            In C a definition of a global variable that does not initialise the variable is considered "tentative". You can have multiple tentative definitions of a variable in the same compilation unit. Multiple tentative defintions in different compilation units are not allowed in standard C, but were historically allowed by C compilers on unix systems.

            Older versions of gcc would allow multiple tenative definitions (but not multiple non-tentative definitions) of a global variable in different compilation units by default. gcc-10 does not. You can restore the old behavior with the command line option "-fcommon" but this is discouraged.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69908418

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install sysroot

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/UBERTC/sysroot.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone UBERTC/sysroot

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:UBERTC/sysroot.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link