sysroot | Work in Progress may eat your cat | Machine Learning library
kandi X-RAY | sysroot Summary
kandi X-RAY | sysroot Summary
Work in Progress may eat your cat.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of sysroot
sysroot Key Features
sysroot Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on sysroot
QUESTION
I am trying to use the C++ API of Pyarrow. There is currently no example for it on the official documentation, and this is the best I am able to come up with for a simple thing:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-28 at 19:33First, the call to Py_Initialize()
is superfluous. You are calling your code from within python and so, presumably, python has already been initialized. That would be needed if you were writing your own main and not a plugin-type library. Correspondingly, the call to Py_Finalize()
is probably a bad idea.
Second, and more significant for the error at hand, is that you are using ctypes.CDLL
(and not, for example, ctypes.PyDLL
) which states (emphasis mine):
The returned function prototype creates functions that use the standard C calling convention. The function will release the GIL during the call. If use_errno is set to true, the ctypes private copy of the system errno variable is exchanged with the real errno value before and after the call; use_last_error does the same for the Windows error code.
And, finally, the Arrow initialization routines assume you are holding the GIL (this should probably be added to the documentation). So the easiest way to fix your program is probably to change CDLL
to PyDLL
:
QUESTION
I am attempting to convert a working Makefile into a CMake and need a little assistance. I am trying to cross compile a small program for a yocto device from a Ubuntu20 machine that is trying to link to the devices shared object file with cmake. I have a working Makefile that builds a working program. However, when I try and do this with a CMakeList file it fails at the make stage linking to the shared objects linker flag.
The file structure of the code is as follows;
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-29 at 23:37QUESTION
I am trying to work with flash memory on MPC5748G - a microcontroller from NXP running FreeRTOS 10.0.1, and I get some behaviour that I can't understand.
I am allocating memory manually, and the assignment seems not to work. However, I can reach the value at the address when using 'printf' - but only from the same function. (I'm using the copy of a pointer, to make sure that some sore of compiler optimisation doesn't take place)
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-16 at 16:50The problem was writing to FLASH memory - it hasn't been correctly initialized.
The proper way to write to flash on MPC5748g using the SDK 3.0.3 is following:
- save flash controller cache
- initialise flash
- check and protect UT block
- unblock an address space
- erase a block in this space
- check if the space block is blank
- program the block
- verify if the block is programmed correctly
- check sum of the programmed data
- restore flash controller cache
The strange behaviour of printf and pointer was due to compiler optimization. After changing the compiler flags to -O0 (no optimization), the error was consistent.
The same consistent error can be achieved when marking the pointers as 'volatile'.
QUESTION
I'm trying to add rotation metadata to the video recorded from RTSP stream. All works fine until I try to run recording with segment format. My command looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-11 at 10:03I found out it has been resolved in
and it works fine in ffmpeg 5.0. You can also apply this patch to 4.4.
QUESTION
I have a Raspberry Pi 4 Model B Rev 1.4 and I am using Ubuntu 20.04 running in VirtualBox on a Windows 10 machine.
I have been following the steps presented in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmtN3Rmx9Rk&list=PLXAxzIhirYJGp1dMN0SxMRNCumubmpzWj&index=2&t=1686s. The goal is to run QT C++ applications on the Raspberry Pi
@24.20, the presenter issues the command:
rsync -avz --rsync-path="sudo rsync" pi@192.168.1.237:/lib sysroot
His host machine receives a number of files. On the video I can see the contents of lib/firmware
, lib/modules.bak
, lib/modules
, lib/udev
However, when I issue the same command, I only receive a symbolic link
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-10 at 09:59Had the same problem. the /lib you want to copy is a link, not a folder. It's linked to /usr/lib. So try it with
QUESTION
In my work I am using a Fortran based program called SPheno. Having SPheno-4.0.4 installed, I tried to install the new version SPheno-4.0.5, however, when selecting F90 = gfortran
in the Makefile, just as I did on my working SPheno-4.0.4 version, it returns me the following error:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-09 at 14:43The output means that make invoked this command:
QUESTION
I am trying to run the training of stylegan2-pytorch on a remote system. The remote system has gcc (9.3.0) installed on it. I'm using conda env that has the following installed (cudatoolkit=10.2, torch=1.5.0+, and ninja=1.8.2, gcc_linux-64=7.5.0). I encounter the following error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-12 at 16:12Just to share, not sure it will help you. However it shows that in standard conditions it is possible to use the conda
gcc
as described in the documentation instead of the system gcc
.
QUESTION
I'm trying to build PetaLinux image as described here: tutorial.
To build it I'm using Fedora 33, which is not officially supported but usually there are workarounds.
I'm having problems with the command petalinux-build
(step 3), after some computation it prints a quite long log on the terminal, stating in particular that:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-04 at 21:55
/home/MY_USER/.../sysroots-uninative/x86_64-linux/lib/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.32' not found (required by /lib64/libgomp.so.1)
You are mixing system libgomp.so.1
with sysroot libc.so.6
-- this will never end well. You probably need to build libgomp.so.1
in the sysroot as well.
And if I run
/lib/libc.so.6
, I get:
That is irrelevant -- you link isn't failing with that library, but with the sysroot one.
If you run /home/MY_USER/path/Project/xilinx-zc702-2018.2/build/tmp/sysroots-uninative/x86_64-linux/lib/libc.so.6
, you'll see that it is in fact too old (older than 2.32
).
QUESTION
I am utilizing yocto (dunfell) to cross-compile a project for multiple different architectures. Specifically, the targets I have are a 64-bit RaspberryPi4 (aarch64) and a 32-bit Orange Pi (armhf). My project that I am cross-compiling compiles and runs without issue when building for the raspi target; the runtime linker is properly set and things run without issue. However, whenever I build for the Orange Pi target, the program appears to compile without issue, but when I try to execute it on the platform, I get a "File not found" error.
This appears to be because the interpreter (runtime linker) is set to /usr/lib/ld.so
which is not actually on the system. See below:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-03 at 13:53After a few days of debugging, I figured out there problem. If anyone with more knowledge than I on linking would like to chime in to add things, please do. Ultimately, this was resolved by using gcc
as the linker as opposed to using ld
(the ones provided by yocto's cross compiler; i.e. aarch64-poky-linux-gcc
).
In order to do this, I modified my recipe to pass in LD=${CC} LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS}
to my Makefile. Now, it builds and executes properly for both the RPi and OrangePi targets.
I believe this is mainly the case because the LDFLAGS
provided by yocto actually can't be parsed by ld
. From my research, it looks like ld
is typically invoked by gcc
. However, the flags still need to get to the complier. So, originally, LDFLAGS
that needed to be passed into linking, weren't being passed in at all because I just assumed there was an error with doing it that way. So, be sure you're passing your LDFLAGS
that yocto gives you into gcc
.
QUESTION
I've had a bit of a look around Stackoverflow and the wider Internet and identified that the most common causes for this error are conflation of declaration (int var = 1;
) and definition (int var;
), and including .c
files from .h
files.
My small project I just split from one file into several is not doing any of these things. I'm very confused.
I made a copy of the project and deleted all the code in the copy (which was fun) until I reached here:
main.c ...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-10 at 21:14Yes there was a change in behaviour.
In C you are supposed to only define a global variable in one translation unit, other translation unit that want to access the variable should declare it as "extern".
In your code, a.h is included in both a.c and main.c so the variable is defined twice. To fix this you should change the "int test" in a.h to "extern int test", then add "int test" to a.c to define the variable exactly once.
In C a definition of a global variable that does not initialise the variable is considered "tentative". You can have multiple tentative definitions of a variable in the same compilation unit. Multiple tentative defintions in different compilation units are not allowed in standard C, but were historically allowed by C compilers on unix systems.
Older versions of gcc would allow multiple tenative definitions (but not multiple non-tentative definitions) of a global variable in different compilation units by default. gcc-10 does not. You can restore the old behavior with the command line option "-fcommon" but this is discouraged.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install sysroot
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page