protogen | Compile proto3 to generate C code for JSON serialization | JSON Processing library
kandi X-RAY | protogen Summary
kandi X-RAY | protogen Summary
Protogen enables you to serialize data as JSON in C++ programs. To use the library you only need a C++11 capable compiler (e.g. Visual Studio or GCC). No extenal dependencies are required.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of protogen
protogen Key Features
protogen Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on protogen
QUESTION
After several years, I've upgraded my version of protogen.exe
to 3.0.101.
The earlier version generated, for each optional member, a boolean property "Specified".
For example, my message had an optional boolean field TurnScreenOnAndOff
.
The C# class would have two properties:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-18 at 06:21Currently, no. However, it is probably no more than a few minutes to enable it; the relevant code is in WriteField()
, noting that ctx.GetCustomOption(key)
accesses additional key/value pairs passed to the generator. This is possibly more of a GitHub discussion, though.
QUESTION
I have a proto file with proto2 syntax. I am trying to auto-generate C# file using the protogen. Although I can generate the file without any errors, I get an error while building the project (the C# file is part of a .Net 5 project in Visual Studio). The error looks like :
error CS0400: The type or namespace name 'Google' could not be found in the global namespace (are you missing an assembly reference?)
I have added the 'descriptor.proto' in the correct path but it does not seem to make any difference in how protogen auto-generates the C# file.
myproto.proto
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-17 at 09:16No Google reference is needed here; you have extended FieldOptions
, which is the descriptor metadata type that relates to fields. protobuf-net has an implementation of that in the protobuf-net.Reflection package, in exactly where this could be expected: Google.Protobuf.Reflection.FieldOptions
.
However! I doubt that this is going to do what you expect. In this scenario, you have defined a "custom option". Custom options aren't related to runtime instance data - they are part of the .proto DSL, and are usually used to influence code generation; in your case, it would be something like:
QUESTION
I have seen example *.proto files where a google.protobuf.Any
data type is used. E.g. from the Eclipse Tahu Sparkplug Version B specification where there is something like:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-15 at 00:12Excellent question. I've been meaning to address this area for ages. The answer is a simple "no, I haven't even looked at it". I'd be happy to do so, but reality is that I have limited time and need to prioritise effort on features people are asking for. "Any" is something I've heard basically no noise about, until today. If you have a genuine use case for it, we can probably look. GitHub or email may be a better place to explore it, unless you're happy to handle it simply via byte[]
and your own code.
QUESTION
I have some protobuf decoder string that I decoeder from https://protogen.marcgravell.com/decode like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-09 at 08:58The size of a varint is determined by the value: there is nothing to configure or determine.
As for the sub-objects: instead of using string
, use a concrete (non-abstract) class, and you should be fine - just use that type instead of string
. The library shows both possibilities because without the schema, it can't be sure which it is, since strings and sub-objects use the same protocol layout. But field 5 could be:
QUESTION
I am trying to use Protogen to create the C# classes this is my syntax
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-27 at 21:32The csharp_out parameter is a folder, not a file, and that isn't how you use proto_path (again, a folder); and it is =
, not :
- in your case you probably want:
QUESTION
Build Failed Logs:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-18 at 17:00This seems to be a cocoapods issue caused by a recommended build setting. A fix is at CocoaPods/CocoaPods#9905 and targeted for CocoaPods 1.10. As a (temporary) workaround you can set "Quoted include in framework headers" in pods project build settings to NO.
QUESTION
I am trying to set up my Windows 10 dev environment same as my Linux, as I want to work with pyCharm.
I did a pip install for some local packages for Linux and Windows - while I can import just fine in Linux, I am having trouble doing that in Windows. For example:
Linux - all good
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-08 at 13:02I had similar issues when I switched to pycharm as well. To me is seems like the environment (Project Interpreter) that we selected affects what we install and how. Have to tried to conda install them and see if that works?
There is also a possibility that AquisATP is available only on Linux and not on Windows.
QUESTION
I am working on deserializing a log file that has been serialized in C using protocol buffers (and NanoPB).
The log file has a short header composed of: entity, version, and identifier. After the header, the stream of data should be continuous and it should log the fields from the sensors but not the header values (this should only occur once and at the beginning).The same .proto file was used to serialize the file. I do not have separate .proto files for the header and for the streamed data.
After my implementation, I assume it should look like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-21 at 21:59It looks like you've serialized a header, then serialized some other data immediately afterwards, meaning: instead of serializing a SessionLogs that has some SessionLogsDetail records, you've serialized a SessionLogs, and then you've serialized (separately) a SessionLogsDetail - does that sound about right? if so: yes, that will not work correctly; there are ways to do what you're after, but it isn't quite as simple as just serializing one after the other, because the root protobuf object is never terminated; so what actually happens is that it overwrites the root object with later fields by number.
There's two ways of addressing this, depending on the data volume. If the size (including all of the detail rows) is small, you can just change the code so that it is a true parent / child relationship, i.e. so that the rows are all inside the parent. When writing the data, this does not mean that you need to have all the rows before you start writing - there are ways of making appending child rows so that you are sending data as it becomes available; however, when deserializing, it will want to load everything in one go, so this approach is only useful if you're OK with that, i.e. you don't have obscene open-ended numbers of rows.
If you have large numbers of rows, you'll need to add your own framing, essentially. This is often done by adding a length-prefix between each payload, so that you can essentially read a single message at a time. Some of the libraries include helper methods for this; for example, in the java API this is parseDelimitedFrom
and writeDelimitedTo
. However, my understand is that the python API does not currently support this utility, so you'd need to do the framing yourself :(
To summarize, you currently have:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install protogen
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page