galera | Synchronous multi-master replication library | Build Tool library
kandi X-RAY | galera Summary
kandi X-RAY | galera Summary
Codership Oy info@codership.com. This is Galera replication - Codership's implementation of the write set replication (wsrep) interface (The software and other files in this directory unless otherwise noted are distributed under GPLv2, see COPYING for details. To build with CMake, do: $ cmake . $ make Run unit tests with CMake: $ make test. Note that Scons has been obsoleted since Galera 3.32, but it is still possible to compile by running: $ scons (default optimized build) or $ ./scripts/build.sh --scons (see ./scripts/build.sh --help for information on options).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of galera
galera Key Features
galera Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on galera
QUESTION
I'm new to MariaDB galera cluster load balancing and I'm trying to use HAProxy to do the load balancing. I have set up the MariaDB Galera cluster and it works perfectly.
In Haproxy, I have created a VIP for the DB cluster and if I look at the HAProxy statistics page it shows the VIP and all three nodes are green. This is how I have it configured:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-24 at 06:09cli ip a check your vip is work on haproxy hosts\
QUESTION
I'm using a maxscale (6.2) readwritesplit router with 3 galera servers (mariadb 10.4). 2 of them are in DC1, and a 3rd one is on a distant DC2.
Using ranks is the only option I see here, as priority
will be used by galeramon to select the master.
My goal is to tell maxscale to use DC1 as much as possible, so server1 as master (priority=1, rank=primary), server2 as slave (priority=2, rank=primary), and use DC2 server3 only if server1 or server2 are not reachable (priority=3, rank=secondary).
Is this the correct behavior?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 12:57Yes, the readwritesplit module only uses connections that have the same rank
. This means that if both server1
and server2
fail, the readwritesplit service will use server3
as long as it is up.
When either of the two other servers comes back up, the galeramon monitor will shift the Master
label from server3
to one of the other nodes. At that point readwritesplit will discard the connection to server3
and reconnect to the nodes with the higher rank, if possible.
QUESTION
I'm new to this whole thing, so please be nice...
I'm using HAProxy as a proxy for multiple things, but the issue that keeps coming back is that I want to use a proxy to connect to a Mariadb Galera cluster. I'm using keepalived to assign a virtual IP, on which the proxy should then listen and balance the connections to the databases. Current status is:
3 machines, each running a set of (slightly modified, only the necesary stuff) keepalived, HAProxy and MariaDB (with Galera enabled).
Their IPs are 10.0.0.1, 10.0.0.2 and 10.0.0.3, virtual IP assigned by keepalived is 10.0.0.9.
HAProxy listens on 3310, then balances to 3306 to the other machines (since the machines running HAProxy also run the database, that's why I use non-default port).
ISSUE: I'm using a no-password test user "lol" with no privileges, connecting from 10.0.0.1 (which also has 10.0.0.9 assigned atm). I'll post the rest below.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-21 at 08:45I have the answer. The issue was, that I needed to add mode tcp
to both the frontend and backend of the database. Now it's working as expected, if there will be any additional issues, I will comment on this answer. There are more things that depend on this.
QUESTION
We have a Galera DB cluster running 3 nodes and a load balancer acting as a intermediary between the nodes. Our application running multiple instances and has a lot of read/writes to the database so we ran into problems with deadlocks when using the loadbalancer for writes. We workaround the problem by selecting one of the 3 nodes specific for writing and still using the loadbalancer for reading.
Now I'm looking for a solution to setup a fallback connection host when there is a problem connecting to the write node so we have no downtime.
I did a lot of research and i found out about this method in Illuminate\Database\Connectors\ConnectionFactory
:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-05 at 15:44So looking at the Illuminate\Database\Connectors\ConnectionFactory
class, your question includes the createPdoResolverWithHosts()
method; you can see this is called by createPdoResolver()
when a hosts
key exists in the config. But if that array key is missing, createPdoResolverWithoutHosts()
is called instead, which directly calls the createConnector()
method. That method returns an instance of the appropriate database connector class. Before it does that, however, it checks for any bound connectors:
QUESTION
I am a newbie in software architecture and I have some question:
I don't understand which requests is sent to the HAProxy on this image.
I mean: if one "Application" Server (backend) want to save data in the Galera Cluster
what is the request that will be sent to the HAProxy?
Is it an sql query "request"?
If it is an sql query should the HAProxy server needs a mysql-server to "handle" the connection?
Should Application Server needs to be configured to make an sql connection to the HAProxy?
from: https://fromdual.com/making-haproxy-high-available-for-mysql-galera-cluster
Thanks!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-08 at 16:08The application only needs to know the IP address of the VIP in this architecture. The app connects to that VIP using a MySQL connector, as if it is a MySQL Server.
The "requests" are then stateful TCP/IP connections using the MySQL protocol, just as if the app were connected directly to a MySQL node.
This is not a series of stateless http requests. You might be assuming that HAProxy is only for load-balancing http requests. In fact, HAProxy can be used for other protocols than http.
QUESTION
I'm setting up a 3 nodes (MariaDB 10.4) Galera cluster with 2 frontal servers.
Inside each of these frontal servers there is also a Maxscale 6 daemon.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-16 at 12:15If you want to access from the local host (i.e. 127.0.0.1
), you either need two separate users ('user'@'127.0.0.1'
and 'user'@'10.1.0.%'
) or a grant that covers them both ('user'@'%'
). A more detailed description of this can be found in the MaxScale tutorial.
You can make authentication handling with MaxScale significantly simpler by using the proxy_protocol
feature in MaxScale. This would allow you to define users only once with the exact IP address they come from and let the proxy-protocol-networks
variable in MariaDB control which MaxScale instances are allowed to act as proxies.
The error 'user'@'127.0.0.1'
means that the client was attempting to connect from the local host, i.e. by connecting to the loopback address. This isn't covered by the 10.1.0.%
host which explains why it failed.
Having converted the user to 'user'@'127.0.0.1'
, the local login between the client and MaxScale worked but then the backend server rejected the authentication as the MaxScale host no longer matches the grant's network (127.0.0.1
).
Using the %
host causes all addresses to match which explains why it solved the problem.
QUESTION
When deploying multiple MaxScale in a Master-Slave typology (failover from master to slave with Keepalived or similar) in front of a Galera Cluster in read-write-split
mode , everything goes fine. But what about a Master-Master like typology in a round-robin fashion, is this possible?
Ex.: Having one MaxScale at 10.0.0.1, a 2nd at 10.0.0.2 and Haproxy in front of it with a roundrobin
or leastconn
distribution algorithm (or even without Haproxy/load-balancer, where applications just connect randomly to one or another) is this possible/well supported by MaxScale?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-18 at 05:05Usually you can connect to any number of MaxScale instances as long as certain features are enabled to guarantee that all MaxScale instances pick the same server where they send writes to.
Galera ClustersIf you are using a Galera cluster, this can be done in a safe and conflict-free manner by enabling the root_node_as_master
parameter. It uses the Galera cluster itself to select which node it uses for writes. This allows your applications to connect to either of the MaxScale instances.
Even without this parameter it would not cause any problems with the database itself but due to the way Galera works, you increase the likelihood of running into a conflict when you COMMIT your transaction if you write to multiple nodes.
Asynchronous Replication ClustersIf you use MaxScale with a cluster that uses asynchronous replication, you still can do this as long as you configure your mariadbmon
monitor to use cooperative_monitoring_locks
. This causes the MaxScale instances to communicate via the database about which servers they see and which of them they chose for writes.
An added benefit of cooperative_monitoring_locks
is that you can enable the automated cluster management parameters auto_failover
and auto_rejoin
without having to worry about two MaxScales attempting to change the replication configuration at the same time: cooperative_monitoring_locks
makes sure only one MaxScale does it.
QUESTION
I'm trying to configure a MySQL server on a virtual machine using Alpine.
I installed the packages mysql
and mysql-client
.
I know that to install them properly, one has to either set things up via command line or edit the configs.
I also know that MariaDB is a forked version of MySQL. I know that MySQL's option file is called my.cnf
and Maria's is mariadb-server.cnf
.
The question is: which one I have to configure, and why in one of the implementation I'm looking at, both files are configured? I'm having some difficulties with understanding how MySQL and MariaDB are connected and why I have to edit both configs. my.cnf
happens to contain only
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-24 at 14:01By default, mysqld will read an option file in a few default locations (e.g. /etc/my.cnf). These are documented: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/configuring-mariadb-with-option-files/#default-option-file-locations
In addition, the my.cnf file may contain a directive to load others:
QUESTION
and I appreciate in advance for your help on this. I have a VPS with the following specs:
OS: Centos 7.x CPU Model: Common KVM processor CPU Details: 6 Core(2200 MHz) Distro Name: CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core) Kernel Version: 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7.x86_64 Database: Server type: MariaDB Server version: 10.2.38-MariaDB - MariaDB Server
And here is mu sqltuner output from letting it run after 48 hours and uptime.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 18:37Rules for memory allocation.
- Do not allocate so much RAM that swapping will occur. Swapping is terrible for MySQL/MariaDB performance.
- Do adjust
innodb_buffer_pool_size
such that most of RAM is in use during normal time and even for spikes in activity. (I often say "set it to 70% of available RAM", but you are asking for more details.) - Do not bother changing other settings; they add to the complexity of "getting it right".
There are 3 situations (based on innodb_buffer_pool_size and dataset size):
- Tiny dataset -- buffer_pool is bigger than necessary --> wasting some of RAM, but so what; it is not useful for anything else. And it give you some room for growth.
- Medium-sized dataset -- Most activity is done in RAM; the system will run nicely.
- Big dataset -- The system may be I/O-bound. Adding RAM is a costly and brute force solution. However, some software techniques (eg, better indexes) may help, such as this for WordPress and WooCommerce.
QUESTION
I've setup a Docker-Compose file that creates a mariadb database and aspnet backend (both from docker files I've written). If I expose ports and run the containers outside of a compose (using localhost) or set network_mode: "host" in the docker-compose file then the app interacts as expected. However, using the default bridge network that the compose generates any command between containers seems to timeout.
I've attempted to run a networking container (nicolaka/netshoot) attached to the same network and ping the relevant containers via the DNS name. The name resolves to the IP address and then the ping hangs, I've also run and attached a mysql container and attempted connecting to the mariadb container which results in a timeout.
This all looks to be some networking issue in my setup. Config listed below, any help would be much appreciated!
MariaDb DockerFile
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-15 at 12:22So I seem to have fixed the issue. Turns out to be an issue with the OS (Arch Linux) not docker, I found this out by running the same files on a Windows system.
For any arch users I've listed my steps out at https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1973008#p1973008
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install galera
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page