ecl | result files from the Eclipse reservoir simulator | Code Editor library

It looks like the command response sent by your device contains the wrong address. As pointed out in the AMQP Adapter User Guide, the response's address property must be set to the value of the reply-to property of the command. That value is usually NOT the same as the reply-to value that your application sets in the command message because the protocol adapter needs to encode some additional information into the reply to address in order to be able to determine the correct device ID when forwarding the command response downstream.

In your code you therefore need to inspect the command message at the device side and use its reply-to value as the command response's address value.

In addition to that, the AMQP adapter expects the status property in the command response to be of AMQP 1.0 type int (a 32 bit signed integer). However, with your code the property value is encoded as an AMQP 1.0 long (64 bit signed integer) by default. In order to encode it correctly, you need to import the int32 class from proton._data and then set the property value as int32(200). Then the adapter accepts the command response and forwards it downstream.

Open your pagination file then add class to nav tag

When the Ball hits the Paddle, the direction of the Ball changes. Add a method paddle_left_collision to the Ball class:

It is not valid to use setf to create new variables. The HyperSpec is pretty clear that setf is only intended to update existing variables:

setf changes the value of place to be newvalue.

(setf place newvalue) expands into an update form that stores the result of evaluating newvalue into the location referred to by place.

setf is intended for updating a place. There is no behavior specified for attempting to use setf to update the value of a place that does not already exist.

In the section which discusses assignment, CLTL2 says a bit more:

Such alteration is different from establishing a new binding. Constructs for establishing new bindings of variables are described in section 7.5.

While this may seem to work, you can't rely on it. It often works in REPLs, and it is fine if you want to use setf this way when playing around in a REPL, but you should not do this in any program.

Did you tried changing the points representation? Using ','/2 to represent tuples with more than two elements per tuple is a bad idea. Note that:

The name of a term must be an atom. Thus, a term such as _(X,Y) is not accepted (because _ is a variable) and causes a syntax error. Thus, you need to modify the definition of predicate analogy/4as following:

Your data is in a good form to get into a dataframe with the right indices.

It's not exactly clear. The spec says:

Executes forms in a dynamic environment where the indicated handler bindings are in effect.

and then says

If an appropriate type is found, the associated handler is run in a dynamic environment where none of these handler bindings are visible (to avoid recursive errors).

If you interpret "run" meaning to call the function, that suggests that the handler expressions are evaluted once, when the bindings are made. This is the CCL/ABCL/ECL/LispWorks implementation, so state is maintained in the closure.

But SBCL appears to have intepreted "run" as meaning "evaluated and called". So a new closure is created each time the handler is run, and state is lost.

I suspect the intent was the first interpretation, since CL has no other "lazy" bindings.

If you change the code in the question to this:

Try logging the SQL query, instead of the values. This should help you see what you're actually telling the DBMS to do. You may find that you're sending it the wrong values.

Also, instead of a couple of numerical for loops, try this: