cxxopts | Lightweight C++ command line option parser | Parser library
kandi X-RAY | cxxopts Summary
kandi X-RAY | cxxopts Summary
Lightweight C++ command line option parser
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of cxxopts
cxxopts Key Features
cxxopts Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on cxxopts
QUESTION
I'm using CMake to facilitate cross-platform builds of a C++ project. Using the same CMakeLists.txt files, I'm successfully completing builds on Linux (generating Unix Makefiles to compile with g++), OSX (generating Unix Makefiles to compile with clang++), and Windows (generating for Visual Studio 16 2019).
Most recently, I've been testing the build process using the MinGW Makefiles generator on Windows. CMake generates the Makefile without any problems. When I call mingw32-make
in the directory where the Makefile is generated, however, I start to run into problems. I'm able to compile several source files into an object library, but when I try to link the print_graphs executable to this object library, I get a flood of multiple definition
errors for methods in the first source file of the object library, as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-06 at 22:46Okay, I found the issue, and, as expected, it was bad form in CMake on my part. In the section of my code with
QUESTION
I've been coding in C/C++ for a while and I'm using the https://github.com/jarro2783/cxxopts library. The library uses the add_options() function to grab it's configuration, like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-13 at 20:01options.add_options()
returns an object.
That object has the function call operator overload that takes two strings, which most likely looks like
QUESTION
I've set up a project to use Coverity Scan.
Under Analysis Settings→Project Components I have
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-16 at 18:06It looks like a regex pattern, in which case the "++" likely needs some form of escaping. I'm not sure which form, because I don't know how the strings are being interpreted or what kind of regex syntax is being used, but some variant of the following should work:
QUESTION
I am tasked with migrating an ancient C++ based code, from Unix environment to Linux. The project is made up of multiple Makefiles, for different "modules" of the library. I have resolved some problems, however now having trouble with the include directive.
Apparently, the way the Makefiles are constructed, is to have a separate include directives, for different files, and it worked for years in the Unix server.
For example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jan-12 at 13:15My idea of letting gnumake do all processing proved to be wrong. The relevant differences between HP-UX 11i Version 1 and the latest Linux build are as follows:
TAB before
include
was silently ignored; now it is interpreted as recipe prefix, and gnu make tries to find include executable on your machine.include
in gnu make silently adds an empty line to the merged output resets the recipe on the boundary of each included file (as MadScientist correctly pointed out), thus included file cannot consist of recipe statements only.
If the included files don't use the same trick recursively (and in your example they seem to be plain actions, with no additional include statements), you can use awk to prepare the merged Makefile on the fly like this:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install cxxopts
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page